Lilypond slowness on Leopard (not snow)
Dear friends,
I am having a big slowness on Lilypond under Leopard (not the snow one,
latest update).
I compiled git version just now (2.13.6) and it is taking too much time
compiling a simple one page document (check attach for it). Compilation
transcription bellow.
THanks for any hint
Alberto
[a...@rachmaninoff 0064]$ time lilypond piano+voz.ly
GNU LilyPond 2.13.6
Processing `piano+voz.ly'
Parsing...
Interpreting music... [8]
Preprocessing graphical objects...
Interpreting music...
MIDI output to `piano+voz.midi'...
Solving 1 page-breaking chunks...[1: 1 pages]
Drawing systems...
Layout output to `piano+voz.ps'...
Converting to `./piano+voz.pdf'...
real0m54.085s
user0m52.691s
sys 0m0.461s
--
Alberto Simões
\version 2.12.2
\header {
title = Louvado seja o meu Senhor
composer = J. Santos
tagline = Transcrita por Alberto Simões
ocasioes = accaodegracas
seccao = accaodegracas
meter = Andante Religioso
}
Revista 30
global = {
\key f \major
\time 2/4
}
melodyA = \relative c' {
\autoBeamOff
\voiceOne
\partial 8*3
c8\mf f g
a a bes a
\time 3/4
g4. g8 a g
f4 f8 c^\markup{\italic{cresc.}} a' bes
\break
\time 2/4
c8 c d c
\time 3/4
bes4. bes8 c bes
a4 a2 \fermata
\bar |.
\set Score.measureLength = #(ly:make-moment 15 8)
g8\p a f1 e8 d2
\set Score.measureLength = #(ly:make-moment 15 8)
c8 d f1 g8 a2
\bar ||
}
melodyB = \relative c' {
\autoBeamOff
\partial 8*3 s4. s2
\time 3/4
s2. s2 f8 g
\time 2/4
a8 a bes a
\time 3/4
g4. g8 a g
f4 f2
}
melody = {
\global \clef treble
\new Voice = mel \melodyA \\ \melodyB
}
text = \lyricmode {
Lou- va- do se- ja_o meu Se- nhor, Lou- va- do se- ja.
Lou- va- do se- ja_o meu Se- nhor, Lou- va- do se- ja.
Pe- los
\once \override LyricText #'self-alignment-X = #LEFT
povos de to- da_a terra,
Pe- los
\once \override LyricText #'self-alignment-X = #LEFT
Anjos do Céu.
}
upperA = \relative c' {
\partial 8*3
c8\([ f g]
a4 bes8[ a]
\time 3/4
g4.\) g8\([ a g]
f4~ f8\) c\([ f a g bes]
\time 2/4
a c4 bes d8[ a c]
\time 3/4
g bes4.\) g bes8\([ a c g bes]
f a2.\) \fermata
\set Score.measureLength = #(ly:make-moment 15 8)
g8\([ a] f1 e8 d2\)
\set Score.measureLength = #(ly:make-moment 15 8)
c8\([ d] f1 g8 a2\)
}
upperB = \relative c' {
\partial 8*3
r8\mf r4
r8 f,8\([ c' d]
\time 3/4
e4\) ees\( d
c8[ bes] a\) r r4
\time 2/4
r8 a8\([ d e]
\time 3/4
f4\) e\( d
c8[ bes]\ c2\)\!
\set Score.measureLength = #(ly:make-moment 15 8)
r4_\p bes1\( s8 bes8[\) c]( a4)
\set Score.measureLength = #(ly:make-moment 15 8)
r4 c1\( s8 c8[\) d]( e4)
}
upper = {
\global
\clef treble
\upperA \\ \upperB
}
lower = \relative c, {
\global
\clef bass
\stemDown
\partial 8*3 r8 r4
r2
\time 3/4
r4 r8 f8\([ bes c]
d4~d8\) r8 r4
\time 2/4
r2
\time 3/4
r4 r8 a8\([ d e]
f2.\)_\fermata
\set Score.measureLength = #(ly:make-moment 15 8)
r4 d1\( s8 d2\)
\set Score.measureLength = #(ly:make-moment 15 8)
r4 a1\( s8 a2\)
}
\score {
\new Staff = melody \melody
\new PianoStaff
\new Staff = upper \upper
\new Staff = lower \lower
\new Lyrics \with { alignAboveContext = upper }
{ \lyricsto mel \text}
\layout {
\context {
\RemoveEmptyStaffContext
% \override VerticalAxisGroup #'remove-first = ##t
}
}
\midi {
\context {
\Score
tempoWholesPerMinute = #(ly:make-moment 75 4)
}
}
}
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Lilypond slowness when invoking with *.ly
Hi all, when processing a number of files, it takes on my machine much more time calling Lily with: lilypond *.ly than lilypond a.ly lilypond b.ly Is this a general issue with Lily's memory managment? Regards, Michael ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: lilypond slowness?
True! but only in Windows. In Linux it is almost instantaneous. Maybe true, but this doesn't help any Windows user. /Helge ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: lilypond slowness?
2007/11/30, Simon Dahlbacka [EMAIL PROTECTED]: didn't find anything 2.7 at (http://download.linuxaudio.org/lilypond/binaries/mingw/) 2.8.0-1 exhibits the same behavior ( i.e. is buggy) I know that there have been instances of this behavior in the past. Can anyone confirm for me that the current version doesn't do the double font caching in XP with these versions? ps. what funky business is the uninstaller up to, given that it seems to be a magnitude slower to uninstall the files than install them ? I don't know. Maybe it's a windows thing. -- Han-Wen Nienhuys - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://www.xs4all.nl/~hanwen ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: lilypond slowness?
Quoting Han-Wen Nienhuys [EMAIL PROTECTED]: 2007/11/30, Simon Dahlbacka [EMAIL PROTECTED]: didn't find anything 2.7 at (http://download.linuxaudio.org/lilypond/binaries/mingw/) 2.8.0-1 exhibits the same behavior ( i.e. is buggy) I know that there have been instances of this behavior in the past. Can anyone confirm for me that the current version doesn't do the double font caching in XP with these versions? Version 2.11.35-2 doesn't seem to rerun the font caching on my XP machine (haven't tried to remove any old cache files, though). /Mats ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: lilypond slowness?
2007/12/1, Mats Bengtsson [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Quoting Han-Wen Nienhuys [EMAIL PROTECTED]: 2007/11/30, Simon Dahlbacka [EMAIL PROTECTED]: didn't find anything 2.7 at (http://download.linuxaudio.org/lilypond/binaries/mingw/) 2.8.0-1 exhibits the same behavior ( i.e. is buggy) I know that there have been instances of this behavior in the past. Can anyone confirm for me that the current version doesn't do the double font caching in XP with these versions? Version 2.11.35-2 doesn't seem to rerun the font caching on my XP machine (haven't tried to remove any old cache files, though). Where do the cache files end up on XP? (I think they should be in $HOME/.lilypond-fontsomething - forgot where that is on windows). -- Han-Wen Nienhuys - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://www.xs4all.nl/~hanwen ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
RE: lilypond slowness?
It seems to be in C:\WINDOWS\System32\FNTCACHE.DAT on my XP system. Trevor D -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:lilypond-user-bounces+t.daniels=treda.co.u [EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Han-Wen Nienhuys Sent: 01 December 2007 15:48 To: Mats Bengtsson Cc: lilypond-user Subject: Re: lilypond slowness? 2007/12/1, Mats Bengtsson [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Quoting Han-Wen Nienhuys [EMAIL PROTECTED]: 2007/11/30, Simon Dahlbacka [EMAIL PROTECTED]: didn't find anything 2.7 at (http://download.linuxaudio.org/lilypond/binaries/mingw/) 2.8.0-1 exhibits the same behavior ( i.e. is buggy) I know that there have been instances of this behavior in the past. Can anyone confirm for me that the current version doesn't do the double font caching in XP with these versions? Version 2.11.35-2 doesn't seem to rerun the font caching on my XP machine (haven't tried to remove any old cache files, though). Where do the cache files end up on XP? (I think they should be in $HOME/.lilypond-fontsomething - forgot where that is on windows). -- Han-Wen Nienhuys - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://www.xs4all.nl/~hanwen ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
RE: lilypond slowness?
It seems to be in C:\WINDOWS\System32\FNTCACHE.DAT on my XP system. Sorry, that's the standard XP font cache. The LP font cache is hidden:- C:\Documents and Settings\[username]\ contains .lilypond-2.8.6-font.cache-1 12/8/2006 .lilypond-2.8.3-font.cache-1 21/5/2006 .fonts.cache-1 14/3/2006 but I can't see any cache relating to LP 2.10 or 2.11.34 - my latest installed version. Trevor D Trevor D -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:lilypond-user-bounces+t.daniels=treda.co.u [EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Han-Wen Nienhuys Sent: 01 December 2007 15:48 To: Mats Bengtsson Cc: lilypond-user Subject: Re: lilypond slowness? 2007/12/1, Mats Bengtsson [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Quoting Han-Wen Nienhuys [EMAIL PROTECTED]: 2007/11/30, Simon Dahlbacka [EMAIL PROTECTED]: didn't find anything 2.7 at (http://download.linuxaudio.org/lilypond/binaries/mingw/) 2.8.0-1 exhibits the same behavior ( i.e. is buggy) I know that there have been instances of this behavior in the past. Can anyone confirm for me that the current version doesn't do the double font caching in XP with these versions? Version 2.11.35-2 doesn't seem to rerun the font caching on my XP machine (haven't tried to remove any old cache files, though). Where do the cache files end up on XP? (I think they should be in $HOME/.lilypond-fontsomething - forgot where that is on windows). -- Han-Wen Nienhuys - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://www.xs4all.nl/~hanwen ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: lilypond slowness?
2007/11/30, Simon Dahlbacka [EMAIL PROTECTED]: ps. what funky business is the uninstaller up to, given that it seems to be a magnitude slower to uninstall the files than install them ? True! but only in Windows. In Linux it is almost instantaneous. -- Francisco Vila. Badajoz (Spain) http://www.paconet.org ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: lilypond slowness?
Ok, I did some further testing ... Test setup: install versions one at a time to C:\lilypond and issue c:\lilypond\usr\bin\lilypond.exe -V file.ly twice and see if it halts at Building font database both times 2.6.5 seemed to work properly didn't find anything 2.7 at ( http://download.linuxaudio.org/lilypond/binaries/mingw/) 2.8.0-1 exhibits the same behavior (i.e. is buggy) This thread http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/msg10945.htmlseems to talk about the same behavior.. I can also provide a FC_DEBUG=255 log if need be, but as the log file is 17.5MB ! I would need to know what to look for in order for me to find something useful from it.. anything more you would need to solve this issue? regards, Simon ps. what funky business is the uninstaller up to, given that it seems to be a magnitude slower to uninstall the files than install them ? On Nov 30, 2007 4:13 AM, Han-Wen Nienhuys [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: 2007/11/29, Simon Dahlbacka [EMAIL PROTECTED]: I have had a break working with lilypond, but I just downloaded 2.11.35 (running on Vista x86), and find it *very* slow compared to my recollection. We're talking close to thee digit numbers for a simple monophonic score with less than 20 bars.. This cannot be right? What am I missing here? running with -V seems to indicate that it's Building font database every time, how can I avoid this? ..and yes, I have installed it to a directory that does not require admin privileges. Unfortunately, I don't have a vista machine handy to test this. Can you check if older versions (2.7, 2.8, 2.9, 2.10, etc.) exhibit the same behavior? If no, can you use bisection to figure out which version introduced the slowness? -- Han-Wen Nienhuys - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://www.xs4all.nl/~hanwen http://www.xs4all.nl/%7Ehanwen ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
lilypond slowness?
I have had a break working with lilypond, but I just downloaded 2.11.35(running on Vista x86), and find it *very* slow compared to my recollection. We're talking close to thee digit numbers for a simple monophonic score with less than 20 bars.. This cannot be right? What am I missing here? running with -V seems to indicate that it's Building font database every time, how can I avoid this? ..and yes, I have installed it to a directory that does not require admin privileges. regards, Simon ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: lilypond slowness?
2007/11/29, Simon Dahlbacka [EMAIL PROTECTED]: I have had a break working with lilypond, but I just downloaded 2.11.35 (running on Vista x86), and find it *very* slow compared to my recollection. We're talking close to thee digit numbers for a simple monophonic score with less than 20 bars.. This cannot be right? What am I missing here? running with -V seems to indicate that it's Building font database every time, how can I avoid this? ..and yes, I have installed it to a directory that does not require admin privileges. Unfortunately, I don't have a vista machine handy to test this. Can you check if older versions (2.7, 2.8, 2.9, 2.10, etc.) exhibit the same behavior? If no, can you use bisection to figure out which version introduced the slowness? -- Han-Wen Nienhuys - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://www.xs4all.nl/~hanwen ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
