optional Dynamics with tag#?
Dear Lilypondians ;)
another day another question - I try to make optional dynamics for a critical
edition,
is it possible, that just dynmaics signs can't be toggled with tags?
8<
\version "2.19.58"
music = \relative {
g'8. c32 d \tag #'dyn {\p } c32 d
}
\score {
\keepWithTag #'dyn \music
}
--->8
Do I really have to use
\tag #'dyn {a4\p} \tag#'nodyn {a4}
and than either \keepWithTag #'dyn \music or \keepWithTag #'nodyn \music?
Cheers Joei
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: optional Dynamics with tag#?
Johannes Roeßler writes:
> Dear Lilypondians ;)
>
> another day another question - I try to make optional dynamics for a
> critical edition,
> is it possible, that just dynmaics signs can't be toggled with tags?
>
> 8<
>
> \version "2.19.58"
>
> music = \relative {
> g'8. c32 d \tag #'dyn {\p } c32 d
> }
> \score {
> \keepWithTag #'dyn \music
> }
Instead of \tag #'dyn {\p } you need to write -\tag #'dyn \p namely use
a - in front to mark the tag call as post-event and omit { } which can
only be used around sequential music, not post events.
> --->8
>
> Do I really have to use
>
> \tag #'dyn {a4\p} \tag#'nodyn {a4}
>
> and than either \keepWithTag #'dyn \music or \keepWithTag #'nodyn \music?
Says who?
--
David Kastrup
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: optional Dynamics with tag#?
> Johannes Roeßler hat am 10. Januar 2018 um 16:50 geschrieben:
>
>
> Dear Lilypondians ;)
>
> another day another question - I try to make optional dynamics for a critical
> edition,
> is it possible, that just dynmaics signs can't be toggled with tags?
Hi Johannes,
> 8<
>
> \version "2.19.58"
>
> music = \relative {
>g'8. c32 d \tag #'dyn {\p } c32 d
> }
> \score {
>\keepWithTag #'dyn \music
> }
>
> --->8
>
> Do I really have to use
>
> \tag #'dyn {a4\p} \tag#'nodyn {a4}
>
> and than either \keepWithTag #'dyn \music or \keepWithTag #'nodyn \music?
You could try
8<
\version "2.19.58"
music = \relative {
g'8. c32 \tag #'dyn {<>\p } d c32 d
}
\score {
\keepWithTag #'dyn \music
}
--->8
Kind regards,
Michael
--
Michael Gerdau email: m...@qata.de
GPG-keys available on request or at public keyserver
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: optional Dynamics with tag#?
thx Michael, works as desired :) ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: optional Dynamics with tag#?
thx David... it can be so simple *facepalm* - and regarding "says who": me :) Joei ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: optional Dynamics with tag#?
Hi Johannes, While the tagging mechanism works in this use-case — and others in the thread have shown you how to accomplish what you need — I strongly encourage you to look at the edition engraver. Especially given your statement > I try to make optional dynamics for a critical edition [!!] you may find helpful the flexibility, scalability, and maintainability it offers. Best regards, Kieren. Kieren MacMillan, composer ‣ website: www.kierenmacmillan.info ‣ email: i...@kierenmacmillan.info ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: optional Dynamics with tag#?
thx Kieren - I will check it out! Sound promising... ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: optional Dynamics with tag#?
On 11 Jan 2018 3:00 a.m., "David Kastrup" wrote:
omit { } which can only be used around sequential music, not post events.
So the “If in doubt, put curly brackets around it” rule doesn't always work
;-)
Vaughan
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: optional Dynamics with tag#?
Vaughan McAlley writes:
> On 11 Jan 2018 3:00 a.m., "David Kastrup" wrote:
>
> omit { } which can only be used around sequential music, not post events.
>
>
> So the “If in doubt, put curly brackets around it” rule doesn't always
> work
I wasn't aware of any such rule in LilyPond. Even in C, macros tend to
prefer putting
do { ... } while (0)
around stuff so that
#define BLA(x) do { ++x; ++x; } while (0)
if (1)
BLA (x);
else
BLA (y);
works without "unexpected else" errors.
--
David Kastrup
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
