Re: pitchedTrill with a chord?
2008/1/19, Jamie Bullock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Out of interest, where would one file such a request? Here: http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=561 Actually, requests are first gathered and approved by the bugmeister -- namely myself :) You can also send requests to the lilypond-devel mailinglist, or write privately to one of the LilyPond developers, assuming he has enough time to consider it... However, I'm trying to honestly keep up with requests such as the 'to-barline discussion, and I happily add every consistent ideas everytime and everywhere I find one. Cheers, Valentin ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: pitchedTrill with a chord?
On Fri, 2008-01-18 at 01:45 +0100, Valentin Villenave wrote: > 2008/1/18, Trevor Bača <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > FWIW, I would vote for missing feature. Some sort of chord trill certainly > > necessary, but all the examples of pitched trill notation have always shown > > only a single note, I believe. So I would doubt that the feature was ever > > implemented in the first place (though I haven't checked for a fact). > > Indeed, which is why you can see that LilyPond has not been written by > pianists :-) > > If nobody has any workaround, I'll fill a request. Out of interest, where would one file such a request? Jamie -- www.postlude.co.uk ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: pitchedTrill with a chord?
2008/1/18, Trevor Bača <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > FWIW, I would vote for missing feature. Some sort of chord trill certainly > necessary, but all the examples of pitched trill notation have always shown > only a single note, I believe. So I would doubt that the feature was ever > implemented in the first place (though I haven't checked for a fact). Indeed, which is why you can see that LilyPond has not been written by pianists :-) If nobody has any workaround, I'll fill a request. Cheers, Valentin ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: pitchedTrill with a chord?
On Jan 16, 2008 10:49 AM, Valentin Villenave <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 2008/1/11, Valentin Villenave <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> Hi everybody,
>
> I have seen a few recent discussions about trillspanners or whatever,
> but unfortunately none answered the following (maybe silly) question:
>
>
> > In the following snippet, the trill can be interpreted as a
> > chord-trill; however, the pitchedTrill indication prints only one
> > note:
> >
> > \relative c'' {
> > \grace 8
> > \pitchedTrill 2. \startTrillSpan
> > 4 \stopTrillSpan
> > }
> >
> > Bug or missing feature? Any workaround (other than polyphonic)?
>
Hi Valentin,
FWIW, I would vote for missing feature. Some sort of chord trill certainly
necessary, but all the examples of pitched trill notation have always shown
only a single note, I believe. So I would doubt that the feature was ever
implemented in the first place (though I haven't checked for a fact).
Trevor.
--
Trevor Bača
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: pitchedTrill with a chord?
2008/1/11, Valentin Villenave <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Hi everybody,
I have seen a few recent discussions about trillspanners or whatever,
but unfortunately none answered the following (maybe silly) question:
> In the following snippet, the trill can be interpreted as a
> chord-trill; however, the pitchedTrill indication prints only one
> note:
>
> \relative c'' {
> \grace 8
> \pitchedTrill 2. \startTrillSpan
> 4 \stopTrillSpan
> }
>
> Bug or missing feature? Any workaround (other than polyphonic)?
>
> Cheers,
> Valentin
>
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
pitchedTrill with a chord?
Hello everybody,
just a small question that occured to me (as the new bugmeister, I
don't want to fill a feature request without discussing it first :)
In the following snippet, the trill can be interpreted as a
chord-trill; however, the pitchedTrill indication prints only one
note:
\relative c'' {
\grace 8
\pitchedTrill 2. \startTrillSpan
4 \stopTrillSpan
}
Bug or missing feature? Any workaround (other than polyphonic)?
Cheers,
Valentin
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
