rest + fermata
Hi,
This is strange:
%%% start of tiny example
\version "2.19.83"
{
r1\fermata
R1\fermata
}
%%% end of tiny example
r1\fermata works fine, R1\fermata doesn't. No fermata sign is printed.
Is this a bug?
--
MT
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: rest + fermata
Hi Martin,
R1^\fermataMarkup
It's special. Refer to the NR.
Andrew
On Sun, 14 Apr 2019 at 21:38, Martin Tarenskeen
wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> This is strange:
>
> %%% start of tiny example
>
> \version "2.19.83"
> {
>r1\fermata
>R1\fermata
> }
>
> %%% end of tiny example
>
> r1\fermata works fine, R1\fermata doesn't. No fermata sign is printed.
> Is this a bug?
>
> --
>
> MT
>
> ___
> bug-lilypond mailing list
> bug-lilyp...@gnu.org
> https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
>
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: rest + fermata
Am So., 14. Apr. 2019 um 13:38 Uhr schrieb Martin Tarenskeen
:
>
>
> Hi,
>
> This is strange:
>
> %%% start of tiny example
>
> \version "2.19.83"
> {
>r1\fermata
>R1\fermata
> }
>
> %%% end of tiny example
>
> r1\fermata works fine, R1\fermata doesn't. No fermata sign is printed.
> Is this a bug?
Hi,
see
http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.19/Documentation/notation/writing-rests#index-_005cfermataMarkup-1
leading to:
{
r1\fermata
R1\fermataMarkup
}
No bug ;)
Cheers,
Harm
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: rest + fermata
- Original Message -
From: "Martin Tarenskeen"
To: "lilypond-user mailinglist" ; "bug-lilypond
mailinglist"
Sent: Sunday, April 14, 2019 12:38 PM
Subject: rest + fermata
Hi,
This is strange:
%%% start of tiny example
\version "2.19.83"
{
r1\fermata
R1\fermata
}
%%% end of tiny example
r1\fermata works fine, R1\fermata doesn't. No fermata sign is printed.
Is this a bug?
--
MT
See
http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.19/Documentation/notation/expressive-marks-attached-to-notes
\fermataMarkup
--
Phil Holmes
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: rest + fermata
Hi Martin, Three identical answers - that's fascinating, It must be due to global distribution delays on the list. cheerio! Andrew ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: rest + fermata
Am 14.04.19 um 13:38 schrieb Martin Tarenskeen:
Hi,
This is strange:
%%% start of tiny example
\version "2.19.83"
{
r1\fermata
R1\fermata
}
%%% end of tiny example
r1\fermata works fine, R1\fermata doesn't. No fermata sign is printed.
Is this a bug?
That’s the third time in a few weeks that someone asks why that doesn’t
work at a list/forum/… that I read.
Looks like I should continue my work on issue 5486
(https://sourceforge.net/p/testlilyissues/issues/5486/) and maybe find a
way that \fermataMarkup isn’t needed anymore and R1\fermata works instead …
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: rest + fermata
On Sun, 14 Apr 2019, Malte Meyn wrote: r1\fermata works fine, R1\fermata doesn't. No fermata sign is printed. Is this a bug? That’s the third time in a few weeks that someone asks why that doesn’t work at a list/forum/… that I read. Looks like I should continue my work on issue 5486 (https://sourceforge.net/p/testlilyissues/issues/5486/) and maybe find a way that \fermataMarkup isn’t needed anymore and R1\fermata works instead … Everyone thanks for the easy solution. Easy but ugly. Would be nice if R1\fermata would simply work. No big deal though, no need to hurry to make this possible, MT ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
