Re: tempo commands not in learning manual

2010-07-31 Thread Phil Holmes

Submitted as http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1197

--
Phil Holmes


- Original Message - 
From: James james.l...@datacore.com

To: Trevor Daniels t.dani...@treda.co.uk
Cc: Lily-Devel List lilypond-de...@gnu.org; lilypond-user@gnu.org; 
dwilck...@lavabit.com

Sent: Friday, July 30, 2010 7:00 PM
Subject: Re: tempo commands not in learning manual



Hello,

On 29/07/2010 23:31, Trevor Daniels wrote:


Dan Wilckens wrote Thursday, July 29, 2010 2:47 PM



My suggestion is to include the \tempo Allegro 4=160 type command in
the Rhythms section of the Learning Manual, since tempo is fundamental
to rhythm, and I didn't find it anywhere else in the learning manual;
I'd even put it as early as 1.2.1, along with Clef, Time Signature,


I agree. A simple example could be included in the same brief
style as the others between Time Signature and Clef in 1.2.1.
This would be easy to do.


I'll make a patch for this today and submit to Trevor.




etc., or at least in section 2.1. And, I'd also suggest it be put
somewhere more logical in the Notation Reference as well, since its
current location Under Staff Notation-Writing Parts is among the last
places I'd think to look to find tempo commands; maybe in section
1.2.3, Displaying Rhythms, alongside Time Signature etc.


I agree with this too. The Metronome marks section would be
better placed in 1.2.3 immediately after Time signature, but
the move would require some juggling with a number of snippets.
There are higher priority doc items, though.


If I get permission (or if someone else would like to) I suggest we make a 
tracker item for this one until I (someone) gets round to it.


James

___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user




___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user


RE: tempo commands not in learning manual

2010-07-31 Thread James Lowe
Hello,

Commits fc1946c290e5f253769a306efff1b0224178aaa5 and 
9e1b534c81e101c449acfa176f923be57cbcaea5 have added a patch in to the Learning 
Manual.

The NR still needs to be done.

Tracker opened http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1197 (thanks 
Phil)

James


-Original Message-
From: Trevor Daniels [mailto:t.dani...@treda.co.uk]
Sent: Thu 29/07/2010 23:31
To: James Lowe; lilypond-user@gnu.org
Cc: Lily-Devel List
Subject: Re: tempo commands not in learning manual
 

Dan Wilckens wrote Thursday, July 29, 2010 2:47 PM


 Hi James,

 I mainly thought the tempo command was too hard to find in the 
 documentation--too illogically placed for me to track down easily 
 navigating the notation reference headings (just tried it in the 
 2.13 doc's, had similar problems before with 2.12 doc's) and I 
 actually couldn't find the command at all in the learning manual 
 in a couple minutes of clicking around the section headings. 
 (Admittedly, in the index it is easy to find.)

 My suggestion is to include the \tempo Allegro 4=160 type 
 command in the Rhythms section of the Learning Manual, since tempo 
 is fundamental to rhythm, and I didn't find it anywhere else in 
 the learning manual; I'd even put it as early as 1.2.1, along with 
 Clef, Time Signature,

I agree.  A simple example could be included in the same brief
style as the others between Time Signature and Clef in 1.2.1.
This would be easy to do.

 etc., or at least in section 2.1.  And, I'd also suggest it be put 
 somewhere more logical in the Notation Reference as well, since 
 its current location Under Staff Notation-Writing Parts is among 
 the last places I'd think to look to find tempo commands; maybe in 
 section 1.2.3, Displaying Rhythms, alongside Time Signature etc.

I agree with this too.  The Metronome marks section would be
better placed in 1.2.3 immediately after Time signature, but
the move would require some juggling with a number of snippets.
There are higher priority doc items, though.

Trevor




___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user


Re: tempo commands not in learning manual

2010-07-30 Thread James

Hello,

On 29/07/2010 23:31, Trevor Daniels wrote:


Dan Wilckens wrote Thursday, July 29, 2010 2:47 PM



My suggestion is to include the \tempo Allegro 4=160 type command in
the Rhythms section of the Learning Manual, since tempo is fundamental
to rhythm, and I didn't find it anywhere else in the learning manual;
I'd even put it as early as 1.2.1, along with Clef, Time Signature,


I agree. A simple example could be included in the same brief
style as the others between Time Signature and Clef in 1.2.1.
This would be easy to do.


I'll make a patch for this today and submit to Trevor.




etc., or at least in section 2.1. And, I'd also suggest it be put
somewhere more logical in the Notation Reference as well, since its
current location Under Staff Notation-Writing Parts is among the last
places I'd think to look to find tempo commands; maybe in section
1.2.3, Displaying Rhythms, alongside Time Signature etc.


I agree with this too. The Metronome marks section would be
better placed in 1.2.3 immediately after Time signature, but
the move would require some juggling with a number of snippets.
There are higher priority doc items, though.


If I get permission (or if someone else would like to) I suggest we make 
a tracker item for this one until I (someone) gets round to it.


James

___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user


Re: tempo commands not in learning manual

2010-07-29 Thread James

Hi James,
I mainly thought the tempo command was too hard to find in the 
documentation--too illogically placed for me to track down easily 
navigating the notation reference headings (just tried it in the 2.13 
doc's, had similar problems before with 2.12 doc's) and I actually 
couldn't find the command at all in the learning manual in a couple 
minutes of clicking around the section headings.  (Admittedly, in the 
index it is easy to find.)
My suggestion is to include the \tempo Allegro 4=160 type command in 
the Rhythms section of the Learning Manual, since tempo is fundamental 
to rhythm, and I didn't find it anywhere else in the learning manual; 
I'd even put it as early as 1.2.1, along with Clef, Time Signature, 
etc., or at least in section 2.1.  And, I'd also suggest it be put 
somewhere more logical in the Notation Reference as well, since its 
current location Under Staff Notation-Writing Parts is among the last 
places I'd think to look to find tempo commands; maybe in section 1.2.3, 
Displaying Rhythms, alongside Time Signature etc.

Hope this clarifies my earlier comments.
Take care,
Dan

On 26/07/2010 16:04, James wrote:

Dan,

On 25/07/2010 02:59, Dan Wilckens wrote:
  Something so fundamental as tempo should be clearly explained
somewhere easy to
  find in the documentation, and it seems to be difficult to find at
all in the
  learning manual (looking at 2.12 documentation and briefly at 2.13).
In my view
  this is something fundamental enough to be in most pieces and should
maybe be
  included in section 2 of the learning manual, either alongside Adding
Text
  (maybe change this section to Adding Text and Tempo Marks), or
perhapsAdvanced
  Rhythmic Commands (although it's not exactly advanced). I remember
having
  trouble finding this documentation in the past and it looks like the
situation
  hasn't been addressed yet. I think this could help new users if all the
  fundamentals are all right there, easy to find.
  Thanks for the great program, Dan W.

Are you saying it is hard to find or that you want more explanation -
suggestions welcome?


James

___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user


___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user


Re: tempo commands not in learning manual

2010-07-29 Thread Trevor Daniels


Dan Wilckens wrote Thursday, July 29, 2010 2:47 PM



Hi James,

I mainly thought the tempo command was too hard to find in the 
documentation--too illogically placed for me to track down easily 
navigating the notation reference headings (just tried it in the 
2.13 doc's, had similar problems before with 2.12 doc's) and I 
actually couldn't find the command at all in the learning manual 
in a couple minutes of clicking around the section headings. 
(Admittedly, in the index it is easy to find.)


My suggestion is to include the \tempo Allegro 4=160 type 
command in the Rhythms section of the Learning Manual, since tempo 
is fundamental to rhythm, and I didn't find it anywhere else in 
the learning manual; I'd even put it as early as 1.2.1, along with 
Clef, Time Signature,


I agree.  A simple example could be included in the same brief
style as the others between Time Signature and Clef in 1.2.1.
This would be easy to do.

etc., or at least in section 2.1.  And, I'd also suggest it be put 
somewhere more logical in the Notation Reference as well, since 
its current location Under Staff Notation-Writing Parts is among 
the last places I'd think to look to find tempo commands; maybe in 
section 1.2.3, Displaying Rhythms, alongside Time Signature etc.


I agree with this too.  The Metronome marks section would be
better placed in 1.2.3 immediately after Time signature, but
the move would require some juggling with a number of snippets.
There are higher priority doc items, though.

Trevor



___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user


Re: tempo commands not in learning manual

2010-07-26 Thread James

Dan,

On 25/07/2010 02:59, Dan Wilckens wrote:
 Something so fundamental as tempo should be clearly explained 
somewhere easy to
 find in the documentation, and it seems to be difficult to find at 
all in the
 learning manual (looking at 2.12 documentation and briefly at 2.13). 
 In my view
 this is something fundamental enough to be in most pieces and should 
maybe be
 included in section 2 of the learning manual, either alongside Adding 
Text
 (maybe change this section to Adding Text and Tempo Marks), or 
perhapsAdvanced
 Rhythmic Commands (although it's not exactly advanced).  I remember 
having
 trouble finding this documentation in the past and it looks like the 
situation

 hasn't been addressed yet.  I think this could help new users if all the
 fundamentals are all right there, easy to find.
 Thanks for the great program, Dan W.

Are you saying it is hard to find or that you want more explanation - 
suggestions welcome?



James

___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user


tempo commands not in learning manual

2010-07-24 Thread Dan Wilckens
Something so fundamental as tempo should be clearly explained somewhere easy to
find in the documentation, and it seems to be difficult to find at all in the
learning manual (looking at 2.12 documentation and briefly at 2.13).  In my view
this is something fundamental enough to be in most pieces and should maybe be
included in section 2 of the learning manual, either alongside Adding Text
(maybe change this section to Adding Text and Tempo Marks), or perhapsAdvanced
Rhythmic Commands (although it's not exactly advanced).  I remember having
trouble finding this documentation in the past and it looks like the situation
hasn't been addressed yet.  I think this could help new users if all the
fundamentals are all right there, easy to find.
Thanks for the great program, Dan W.


___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user