Re: two lv ties on merged notehead
Thanks all, Seems like there are many solutions. Also know I understand the problem so will be able to look for such things in the future. Best, Michael Jun 4, 2020, 04:20 by r...@dabble.ch: > Michael Winter wrote: > > It seems that when a notehead is merged in two voices no matter what you do > you, lilypond only adds on lv tie. > There are indeed two lv ties. But in your example they are using the same > (default) settings and so end up exactly superimposed. > > Try giving the one of them a difference: > > d,4-\tweak direction #UP \laissezVibrer > > > Cheers, > Robin >
Re: two lv ties on merged notehead
Michael Winter wrote: It seems that when a notehead is merged in two voices no matter what you do you, lilypond only adds on lv tie. There are indeed two lv ties. But in your example they are using the same (default) settings and so end up exactly superimposed. Try giving the one of them a difference: d,4-\tweak direction #UP \laissezVibrer Cheers, Robin
Re: two lv ties on merged notehead
Hi Michael, Looks like LilyPond prints both lv ties, but they end up at exactly the same spot. The ^ and _ prefixes let you specify direction for most anything, including \laissezVibrer, so you could do this to separate them: \new Staff { << { d,4 ^\laissezVibrer ^\markup{ 0.0 } } \new Voice { \voiceTwo d,4 \laissezVibrer } >> } Hope this helps, Owen On Wed, Jun 3, 2020 at 5:14 PM Michael Winter via LilyPond user discussion < lilypond-user@gnu.org> wrote: > It seems that when a notehead is merged in two voices no matter what you > do you, lilypond only adds on lv tie. Is there a way to force 2 lv ties? > > <<{ d,4\laissezVibrer ^ \markup{ 0.0 } } \new Voice { \voiceTwo > d,4\laissezVibrer }>> > > Thanks in advance. > > -Michael >
two lv ties on merged notehead
It seems that when a notehead is merged in two voices no matter what you do you, lilypond only adds on lv tie. Is there a way to force 2 lv ties? <<{ d,4\laissezVibrer ^ \markup{ 0.0 } } \new Voice { \voiceTwo d,4\laissezVibrer }>> Thanks in advance. -Michael