Re: [PATCH 1/2] ARM: ux500: rename ab8500 to abx500 for hwmon driver

2013-02-03 Thread Samuel Ortiz 
Hi Hongbo,

On Wed, Jan 30, 2013 at 06:21:27PM +0800, Hongbo Zhang wrote:
> We are using a generic abx500 hwmon layer, so rename specific ab8500 to 
> generic
> abx500 for hwmon device and driver matching.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Hongbo Zhang 
> ---
>  drivers/mfd/ab8500-core.c | 6 +++---
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
Patch applied, after fixing the subject. Thanks.

Cheers,
Samuel.

-- 
Intel Open Source Technology Centre
http://oss.intel.com/

___
linaro-dev mailing list
linaro-dev@lists.linaro.org
http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro-dev

Re: [PATCH 0/4] davinci: cpuidle - some cleanups

2013-02-03 Thread Daniel Lezcano 
On 02/03/2013 02:00 PM, Sekhar Nori wrote:
> On 2/3/2013 5:52 PM, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
>> On 02/03/2013 12:54 PM, Sekhar Nori wrote:
>>> On 2/2/2013 12:19 AM, Len Brown wrote:
 On 02/01/2013 08:48 AM, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
> This patchset does some cleanup. It could have been folded in a single
> patch but the review would have been less clean than splitting it into
> small and trivial patches.
>
> The main purpose of this patch is to remove the usage of the driver_data
> field from the state_usage structure. Len Brown is doing this cleanup in
> the intel_idle.c file. With this patchset, the processor_idle.c file will
> be the last user of this field.

 Daniel,
 Thanks for this cleanup.
 Hopefully we can hear from somebody with davinci HW who can test it?
>>>
>>> Can someone forward the patches to
>>> davinci-linux-open-sou...@linux.davincidsp.com? I can help verify.
>>
>> I cc'ed this mailing list but I have not subscribed to it. The mailing
>> list description says "moderated for non-subscribers" in the MAINTAINERS
>> file.
>>
>> I assumed the moderator will accept the patchset.
>>
>> Shall I subscribe and resend ?
> 
> No need. I see the patches on the list. I will test and get back.

Cool ! Thanks !

  -- Daniel

-- 
  Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs

Follow Linaro:   Facebook |
 Twitter |
 Blog


___
linaro-dev mailing list
linaro-dev@lists.linaro.org
http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro-dev

Re: [PATCH 0/4] davinci: cpuidle - some cleanups

2013-02-03 Thread Sekhar Nori 
On 2/3/2013 5:52 PM, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
> On 02/03/2013 12:54 PM, Sekhar Nori wrote:
>> On 2/2/2013 12:19 AM, Len Brown wrote:
>>> On 02/01/2013 08:48 AM, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
 This patchset does some cleanup. It could have been folded in a single
 patch but the review would have been less clean than splitting it into
 small and trivial patches.

 The main purpose of this patch is to remove the usage of the driver_data
 field from the state_usage structure. Len Brown is doing this cleanup in
 the intel_idle.c file. With this patchset, the processor_idle.c file will
 be the last user of this field.
>>>
>>> Daniel,
>>> Thanks for this cleanup.
>>> Hopefully we can hear from somebody with davinci HW who can test it?
>>
>> Can someone forward the patches to
>> davinci-linux-open-sou...@linux.davincidsp.com? I can help verify.
> 
> I cc'ed this mailing list but I have not subscribed to it. The mailing
> list description says "moderated for non-subscribers" in the MAINTAINERS
> file.
> 
> I assumed the moderator will accept the patchset.
> 
> Shall I subscribe and resend ?

No need. I see the patches on the list. I will test and get back.

Thanks,
Sekhar

___
linaro-dev mailing list
linaro-dev@lists.linaro.org
http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro-dev

Re: [PATCH 0/4] davinci: cpuidle - some cleanups

2013-02-03 Thread Daniel Lezcano 
On 02/03/2013 12:54 PM, Sekhar Nori wrote:
> On 2/2/2013 12:19 AM, Len Brown wrote:
>> On 02/01/2013 08:48 AM, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
>>> This patchset does some cleanup. It could have been folded in a single
>>> patch but the review would have been less clean than splitting it into
>>> small and trivial patches.
>>>
>>> The main purpose of this patch is to remove the usage of the driver_data
>>> field from the state_usage structure. Len Brown is doing this cleanup in
>>> the intel_idle.c file. With this patchset, the processor_idle.c file will
>>> be the last user of this field.
>>
>> Daniel,
>> Thanks for this cleanup.
>> Hopefully we can hear from somebody with davinci HW who can test it?
> 
> Can someone forward the patches to
> davinci-linux-open-sou...@linux.davincidsp.com? I can help verify.

I cc'ed this mailing list but I have not subscribed to it. The mailing
list description says "moderated for non-subscribers" in the MAINTAINERS
file.

I assumed the moderator will accept the patchset.

Shall I subscribe and resend ?

Thanks
  -- Daniel


-- 
  Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs

Follow Linaro:   Facebook |
 Twitter |
 Blog


___
linaro-dev mailing list
linaro-dev@lists.linaro.org
http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro-dev

Re: [PATCH 0/4] davinci: cpuidle - some cleanups

2013-02-03 Thread Sekhar Nori 
On 2/2/2013 12:19 AM, Len Brown wrote:
> On 02/01/2013 08:48 AM, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
>> This patchset does some cleanup. It could have been folded in a single
>> patch but the review would have been less clean than splitting it into
>> small and trivial patches.
>>
>> The main purpose of this patch is to remove the usage of the driver_data
>> field from the state_usage structure. Len Brown is doing this cleanup in
>> the intel_idle.c file. With this patchset, the processor_idle.c file will
>> be the last user of this field.
> 
> Daniel,
> Thanks for this cleanup.
> Hopefully we can hear from somebody with davinci HW who can test it?

Can someone forward the patches to
davinci-linux-open-sou...@linux.davincidsp.com? I can help verify.

Thanks,
Sekhar

___
linaro-dev mailing list
linaro-dev@lists.linaro.org
http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro-dev