Re: f2fs support

2013-05-03 Thread Riku Voipio
Hi Anca,

You should ask LaMont who is the maintainer of util-linux.

Riku


On 3 May 2013 00:13, Anca Emanuel anca.eman...@gmail.com wrote:

 Hi.

 Wookey you have some debian experience: it is possible to update
 libblkid to version 2.23 ?
 more on this: http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=2137837page=2

 ___
 linaro-dev mailing list
 linaro-dev@lists.linaro.org
 http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro-dev

___
linaro-dev mailing list
linaro-dev@lists.linaro.org
http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro-dev


Re: [ANNOUNCE] linux-linaro kernel schedule for 13.05 published

2013-05-03 Thread Jon Medhurst (Tixy)
On Thu, 2013-05-02 at 22:40 +0400, Andrey Konovalov wrote:
 Greetings,
 
 This wiki page:
 
 https://wiki.linaro.org/Platform/DevPlatform/LinuxLinaroKernelSchedule
 
 - is now tracking the linux-linaro kernel rebuilds for 13.05.
 
 v3.9 release based linux-linaro-core-tracking (llct) rebuild has been 
 published, the tag is llct-20130502.0 . The 13.05 linux-linaro release 
 will be v3.10-rc3 based,

I think you may have miscalculated. Isn't the merge window 2 weeks long?
In which case, as 3.9 was released this past Monday, we shouldn't expect
-rc1 until May 13th and -rc3 will be in June.

-- 
Tixy


___
linaro-dev mailing list
linaro-dev@lists.linaro.org
http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro-dev


Re: [ANNOUNCE] linux-linaro kernel schedule for 13.05 published

2013-05-03 Thread Mark Brown
On Fri, May 03, 2013 at 09:47:53AM +0100, Jon Medhurst (Tixy) wrote:
 On Thu, 2013-05-02 at 22:40 +0400, Andrey Konovalov wrote:

  v3.9 release based linux-linaro-core-tracking (llct) rebuild has been 
  published, the tag is llct-20130502.0 . The 13.05 linux-linaro release 
  will be v3.10-rc3 based,

 I think you may have miscalculated. Isn't the merge window 2 weeks long?
 In which case, as 3.9 was released this past Monday, we shouldn't expect
 -rc1 until May 13th and -rc3 will be in June.

Yes, the merge window is about two weeks long.  Approximately, depending
on what Linus feels like.


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
___
linaro-dev mailing list
linaro-dev@lists.linaro.org
http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro-dev


Re: [PATCH] genirq: Add default affinity mask command line option

2013-05-03 Thread Punit Agrawal

(adding Robin to 'cc)

On 22/04/13 07:51, Viresh Kumar wrote:

On 19 November 2012 20:17, Punit Agrawal punit.agra...@arm.com wrote:

The patch was picked up as-is from the RT patches as it implements a
functionality that we wanted to better control IRQ affinity. Being part
of the RT patches, I hope that it'll merge into mainline via that route
and I am not going to try to mainline it. So your comments will be best
addressed to the original patch postings on the lkml (Search for RT
patches).

If you think it is really important to address your comments for the
patch that goes into Linaro kernel, I could address them and send an
updated patch. Though in that case, I am not quite sure how to attribute
the original author who wrote the patch.


Hi Punit,


Hello Viresh,

Apologies for the delay in getting back on this.



Can you please follow up on this patch to see its status. Its not mainlined yet.



Robin will be following up with the patch author for upstream inclusion.
In the meanwhile, it'd be good if you continued carrying this patch in
your MP tree.

Thanks,
Punit


--
viresh






-- IMPORTANT NOTICE: The contents of this email and any attachments are 
confidential and may also be privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, 
please notify the sender immediately and do not disclose the contents to any 
other person, use it for any purpose, or store or copy the information in any 
medium.  Thank you.


___
linaro-dev mailing list
linaro-dev@lists.linaro.org
http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro-dev


Re: RTSM terminal_0 cannot display with linux-system-foundation.axf of linux-3.8

2013-05-03 Thread Jonathan Aquilina
Im not trying to hijack this thread, but i find it very interesting to see
you guys working on seperate tress from the mainline kernel. Wouldnt it be
beneficial any patches etc that linaro work on and changes made get
upstreamed?


On Fri, May 3, 2013 at 12:48 PM, Ryan Harkin ryan.har...@linaro.org wrote:

 Hi,

 On 3 May 2013 10:08, Wang Wei bessel.w...@huawei.com wrote:
  Dear linaro members
 
  I want to build arm64 kernel according to the steps of
 HowTo/BuildArm64Kernel. Then i use Foundatin_v8 with args such as
 linux-system-foundation.axf,vexpress64-openembedded_lam-armv8_20130320-274.img.
  But RTSM terminal_0 cannot display. I tried my best to search for
 methods to solve it. But i cannot find a correct method to handle with it.
 I need some help.

 Have you tried to run our binaries from our release first, to make
 sure your setup is correct?  Then, when you know the setup is correct,
 build your own kernel and see what happens.

 RTSM_terminal_0 may not display because the kernel is crashing and has
 not started the console output yet.  There are many reasons for this,
 like using a wrong kernel binary, using the wrong device tree, etc...
 That's why I recommend you take our release version first and try
 that.


 
  I tried to slove it as following:
 
  I have tried  3.7 kernel and used 3.9-rc even.

 Basically, the upstream kernel does not have the same arm64 support
 included as we have in Linaro's trees.  We are using code taken from
 Catalin's tree and adding some patches ourselves.

 If you want to work with our instructions, you should use our tree:

   https://git.linaro.org/gitweb?p=kernel/linux-linaro-tracking.git

 That should be the easiest way to reproduce the issue.

  But i cannot built kenel correctly. Because some files such as
 arm64/boot/dts/vexpress-v2p-aarch64.dts,
  vexpress-foundation-v8.dts,vexpress-v2m-rs1.dtsi,skeleton.dtsi and
 arm64/configs/vexpress_defconfig don’t exist in 3.7 kernel and 3.9-rc even.
  So i cannot complete building kernel. Also i cannot use boot wrapper to
 generate a linux-system-foundation.axf suitable for a Foundation model.
  Then I copied the above files from
  linaro-aarch64-linaro-aarch64-3.6-fdf0f30 to 3.7 kernel and 3.9-rc even.
  Though I got linux-system-foundation.axf, i used foundation_v8 with the
 new linux-system-foundation.axf and rootfs.img and RTSM terminal_0 cannot
 display. I don’t know which step I made mistake.
 
  So i need to ask for help to know how to build arm64 kernel of 3.7
 kernel and 3.9-rc even and generate a linux-system-foundation.axf which can
 run on Foundation model.
  For example, i should how to write configuration files such as
  vexpress_defconfig,vexpress-foundation-v8.dts,vexpress-v2p-aarch64.dts and
 so on.
  These files such as vexpress-foundation-v8.dts,vexpress-v2p-aarch64.dts
 are used to do what? Why RTSM terminal_0 cannot display?
 
  Thanks
  Xiaoke Wu
 
 
  ___
  linaro-dev mailing list
  linaro-dev@lists.linaro.org
  http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro-dev

 ___
 linaro-dev mailing list
 linaro-dev@lists.linaro.org
 http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro-dev




-- 
Jonathan Aquilina
___
linaro-dev mailing list
linaro-dev@lists.linaro.org
http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro-dev


Re: RTSM terminal_0 cannot display with linux-system-foundation.axf of linux-3.8

2013-05-03 Thread Ryan Harkin
On 3 May 2013 12:04, Jonathan Aquilina eagles051...@gmail.com wrote:
 Im not trying to hijack this thread, but i find it very interesting to see
 you guys working on seperate tress from the mainline kernel. Wouldnt it be
 beneficial any patches etc that linaro work on and changes made get
 upstreamed?

That's sort-of what's happening.  If you look what's in our tree, it's
basically mainline + the latest patches from Catalin's tree that
aren't upstream yet + some config changes.  That's the idea, at least.




 On Fri, May 3, 2013 at 12:48 PM, Ryan Harkin ryan.har...@linaro.org wrote:

 Hi,

 On 3 May 2013 10:08, Wang Wei bessel.w...@huawei.com wrote:
  Dear linaro members
 
  I want to build arm64 kernel according to the steps of
  HowTo/BuildArm64Kernel. Then i use Foundatin_v8 with args such as
  linux-system-foundation.axf,vexpress64-openembedded_lam-armv8_20130320-274.img.
  But RTSM terminal_0 cannot display. I tried my best to search for
  methods to solve it. But i cannot find a correct method to handle with it. 
  I
  need some help.

 Have you tried to run our binaries from our release first, to make
 sure your setup is correct?  Then, when you know the setup is correct,
 build your own kernel and see what happens.

 RTSM_terminal_0 may not display because the kernel is crashing and has
 not started the console output yet.  There are many reasons for this,
 like using a wrong kernel binary, using the wrong device tree, etc...
 That's why I recommend you take our release version first and try
 that.


 
  I tried to slove it as following:
 
  I have tried  3.7 kernel and used 3.9-rc even.

 Basically, the upstream kernel does not have the same arm64 support
 included as we have in Linaro's trees.  We are using code taken from
 Catalin's tree and adding some patches ourselves.

 If you want to work with our instructions, you should use our tree:

   https://git.linaro.org/gitweb?p=kernel/linux-linaro-tracking.git

 That should be the easiest way to reproduce the issue.

  But i cannot built kenel correctly. Because some files such as
 arm64/boot/dts/vexpress-v2p-aarch64.dts,
  vexpress-foundation-v8.dts,vexpress-v2m-rs1.dtsi,skeleton.dtsi and
  arm64/configs/vexpress_defconfig don’t exist in 3.7 kernel and 3.9-rc even.
  So i cannot complete building kernel. Also i cannot use boot wrapper to
  generate a linux-system-foundation.axf suitable for a Foundation model.
  Then I copied the above files from
  linaro-aarch64-linaro-aarch64-3.6-fdf0f30 to 3.7 kernel and 3.9-rc even.
  Though I got linux-system-foundation.axf, i used foundation_v8 with the
  new linux-system-foundation.axf and rootfs.img and RTSM terminal_0 cannot
  display. I don’t know which step I made mistake.
 
  So i need to ask for help to know how to build arm64 kernel of 3.7
  kernel and 3.9-rc even and generate a linux-system-foundation.axf which can
  run on Foundation model.
  For example, i should how to write configuration files such as
  vexpress_defconfig,vexpress-foundation-v8.dts,vexpress-v2p-aarch64.dts and
  so on.
  These files such as vexpress-foundation-v8.dts,vexpress-v2p-aarch64.dts
  are used to do what? Why RTSM terminal_0 cannot display?
 
  Thanks
  Xiaoke Wu
 
 
  ___
  linaro-dev mailing list
  linaro-dev@lists.linaro.org
  http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro-dev

 ___
 linaro-dev mailing list
 linaro-dev@lists.linaro.org
 http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro-dev




 --
 Jonathan Aquilina

___
linaro-dev mailing list
linaro-dev@lists.linaro.org
http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro-dev


kernel (WAS RTSM terminal_0 cannot display with linux-system-foundation.axf of linux-3.8)

2013-05-03 Thread Jonathan Aquilina
Whats the advantage of working down stream instead, why not just work with
the main line upstream and they commit their changes directly to upstream
instead of having a linaro tree so to speak.

-- 
Jonathan Aquilina
___
linaro-dev mailing list
linaro-dev@lists.linaro.org
http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro-dev


Re: RTSM terminal_0 cannot display with linux-system-foundation.axf of linux-3.8

2013-05-03 Thread Christopher Covington
Hi Xiaoke,

On 05/03/2013 05:08 AM, Wang Wei wrote:
 Dear linaro members
 
 I want to build arm64 kernel according to the steps of 
 HowTo/BuildArm64Kernel. Then i use Foundatin_v8 with args such as 
 linux-system-foundation.axf,vexpress64-openembedded_lam-armv8_20130320-274.img.
 But RTSM terminal_0 cannot display. I tried my best to search for methods to 
 solve it. But i cannot find a correct method to handle with it. I need some 
 help.
 
 I tried to slove it as following:
 
 I have tried  3.7 kernel and used 3.9-rc even. But i cannot built kenel 
 correctly. Because some files such as arm64/boot/dts/vexpress-v2p-aarch64.dts,
 vexpress-foundation-v8.dts,vexpress-v2m-rs1.dtsi,skeleton.dtsi and 
 arm64/configs/vexpress_defconfig don’t exist in 3.7 kernel and 3.9-rc even.
 So i cannot complete building kernel. Also i cannot use boot wrapper to 
 generate a linux-system-foundation.axf suitable for a Foundation model.
 Then I copied the above files from  linaro-aarch64-linaro-aarch64-3.6-fdf0f30 
 to 3.7 kernel and 3.9-rc even.
 Though I got linux-system-foundation.axf, i used foundation_v8 with the new 
 linux-system-foundation.axf and rootfs.img and RTSM terminal_0 cannot 
 display. I don’t know which step I made mistake.
 
 So i need to ask for help to know how to build arm64 kernel of 3.7 kernel and 
 3.9-rc even and generate a linux-system-foundation.axf which can run on 
 Foundation model.
 For example, i should how to write configuration files such as  
 vexpress_defconfig,vexpress-foundation-v8.dts,vexpress-v2p-aarch64.dts and so 
 on.
 These files such as vexpress-foundation-v8.dts,vexpress-v2p-aarch64.dts are 
 used to do what? Why RTSM terminal_0 cannot display?

For what it's worth, I'm happily building and booting Catalin Marinas's
soc-armv8-model branch [1] with his latest version of the AArch64 boot-wrapper
[2]. From the names you're using, it sounds like you might be using an older
revision of the boot-wrapper. The devicetree files were renamed a few months
ago [3] [4].

1.
http://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/cmarinas/linux-aarch64.git/log/?h=soc-armv8-model
2.
http://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/cmarinas/boot-wrapper-aarch64.git/log/
3.
http://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/cmarinas/boot-wrapper-aarch64.git/commit/?id=b4ebd41f98ed13a92e4877cd84984aeff5187734
4.
http://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/cmarinas/boot-wrapper-aarch64.git/commit/?id=c51dde817b5ed5b8f741b67ac51bd67bd87b4a2a

Regards,
Christopher

-- 
Employee of Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc.
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
hosted by the Linux Foundation.

___
linaro-dev mailing list
linaro-dev@lists.linaro.org
http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro-dev


Re: RTSM terminal_0 cannot display with linux-system-foundation.axf of linux-3.8

2013-05-03 Thread Jon Medhurst (Tixy)
On Fri, 2013-05-03 at 08:06 -0400, Christopher Covington wrote:
 Hi Xiaoke,
 
 On 05/03/2013 05:08 AM, Wang Wei wrote:
  Dear linaro members
  
  I want to build arm64 kernel according to the steps of 
  HowTo/BuildArm64Kernel. Then i use Foundatin_v8 with args such as 
  linux-system-foundation.axf,vexpress64-openembedded_lam-armv8_20130320-274.img.
  But RTSM terminal_0 cannot display. I tried my best to search for methods 
  to solve it. But i cannot find a correct method to handle with it. I need 
  some help.
  
  I tried to slove it as following:
  
  I have tried  3.7 kernel and used 3.9-rc even. But i cannot built kenel 
  correctly. Because some files such as 
  arm64/boot/dts/vexpress-v2p-aarch64.dts,
  vexpress-foundation-v8.dts,vexpress-v2m-rs1.dtsi,skeleton.dtsi and 
  arm64/configs/vexpress_defconfig don’t exist in 3.7 kernel and 3.9-rc even.
  So i cannot complete building kernel. Also i cannot use boot wrapper to 
  generate a linux-system-foundation.axf suitable for a Foundation model.
  Then I copied the above files from  
  linaro-aarch64-linaro-aarch64-3.6-fdf0f30 to 3.7 kernel and 3.9-rc even.
  Though I got linux-system-foundation.axf, i used foundation_v8 with the new 
  linux-system-foundation.axf and rootfs.img and RTSM terminal_0 cannot 
  display. I don’t know which step I made mistake.
  
  So i need to ask for help to know how to build arm64 kernel of 3.7 kernel 
  and 3.9-rc even and generate a linux-system-foundation.axf which can run on 
  Foundation model.
  For example, i should how to write configuration files such as  
  vexpress_defconfig,vexpress-foundation-v8.dts,vexpress-v2p-aarch64.dts and 
  so on.
  These files such as vexpress-foundation-v8.dts,vexpress-v2p-aarch64.dts are 
  used to do what? Why RTSM terminal_0 cannot display?
 
 For what it's worth, I'm happily building and booting Catalin Marinas's
 soc-armv8-model branch [1] with his latest version of the AArch64 boot-wrapper
 [2].

And this should pretty much be the same as what is in Linaro's kernel
because we just pull in Catalin's branch and reorganise/rebase patches
to fit in with our workflow.

-- 
Tixy


___
linaro-dev mailing list
linaro-dev@lists.linaro.org
http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro-dev


big.LITTLE MP status Apr 30, 2013

2013-05-03 Thread Serge Broslavsky
https://wiki.linaro.org/projects/big.LITTLE.MP

Work Items for functional completion:
  https://wiki.linaro.org/projects/big.LITTLE.MP/WorkItems

Roadmap Cards:
  Epic big.LITTLE MP card - http://cards.linaro.org/browse/CARD-190

Main Project page:
  https://launchpad.net/linaro-big-little-system

Announcement
=

According to the TSC decision the IKS code is now made public:
http://www.linaro.org/linaro-blog/2013/05/02/the-linaro-iks-code-now-publicly-available/

Quote from the link above: The core MCPM patches are queued for
inclusion into the v3.10 mainline kernel.  The MCPM backend for TC2 and
the IKS patches will tentatively be submitted for v3.11.


Development


Big.LITTLE MP is following a two-track development:

1. A Reference (stable) patchset:

https://git.linaro.org/gitweb?p=arm/big.LITTLE/mp.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/linux-linaro-MP-reference-20130418

2. And an upstream (work in progress) patchset:

https://git.linaro.org/gitweb?p=arm/big.LITTLE/mp.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/linux-linaro-MP-upstream-20130418

Both branches are now merged with linux-linaro branch.


Automated benchmarking code is ready (reviewing), permissions to be added.

   - LAVA API is in production now
   - working on getting it used


Blueprint Updates
--

* 
https://blueprints.launchpad.net/linaro-big-little-system/+spec/big-little-mp-integration-tree

  No issues, moving forward


* 
https://blueprints.launchpad.net/linaro-big-little-system/+spec/cpuidle-add-cpu-specific-states-capability

  Postponed to the next month (May 2013).


* 
https://blueprints.launchpad.net/linaro-big-little-system/+spec/small-task-packing-in-scheduler

  Two fix patches have been accepted.

  V4 sent to LKML. Started getting feedback.


* 
https://blueprints.launchpad.net/linaro-big-little-system/+spec/cpu-hot-plug-latency

  Moving forward as the crash has been resolved.

  Pass/Fail verdict needs to be added to cpu_hotplug_latency test
  script.


*  
https://blueprints.launchpad.net/linaro-big-little-system/+spec/sched-cooperation-with-dvfs

  Long-lasting BP (6+ month to get something), just starting


QA
==

big.LITTLE MP LAVA Dashboard
http://validation.linaro.org/lava-server/dashboard/image-reports/linaro-android_vexpress-linaro-mp

Testing (2013.04 release):

sched_tests.git   #Cases  #Run  Pass  Fail Absolute pass rate
Regression  20 1919 0 100 %
mpbasicsuite14 1010 0 100 %
mpcoresuite 10  6 5 1  90 %
mpextendedsuite 20 10 7 3  70 %
mploadbalance2  2 2 0 100 %

http://lists.linaro.org/pipermail/linaro-dev/2013-April/015864.html

Bugs:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/linaro-big-little-system/+bugs?field.tag=bl-mp


-- 
Best Regards,
Serge Broslavsky serge.broslav...@linaro.org

Project Manager, Linaro
M: +37129426328  IRC: ototo  Skype: serge.broslavsky
http://linaro.org | Open source software for ARM SoCs

___
linaro-dev mailing list
linaro-dev@lists.linaro.org
http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro-dev


Linaro Virtualization status 1 May 2013 (Weeks 16-18)

2013-05-03 Thread Serge Broslavsky

Linaro Virtualization Team's Weekly Report - Weeks 16-18 2013
=

During the last 3 weeks (11 April - 1 May 2013) the team has been
working on the following areas. More detailed information can be found
on the meeting reports Wiki page:
[https://wiki.linaro.org/LEG/Engineering/Virtualization/TeamMeetingReports].


Ongoing work


* BOOTLOADER HYP MODE SUPPORT FOR ARMv7
[http://cards.linaro.org/browse/CARD-361]
by Andre Przywara

* rebase existing Versatile Express patches against upstream u-boot
[http://cards.linaro.org/browse/VIRT-70]

Done:
- sent out RFC version
- got review comments
Working on:
- resending next version of the patches

* implement HYP command to let u-boot switch into HYP mode
[http://cards.linaro.org/browse/VIRT-71]

Done.


* ARMv7 KVM GUEST MIGRATION
[http://cards.linaro.org/browse/CARD-363]
by Peter Maydell and Andre Przywara

* QEMU: implement full cp15 sync with kernel
[http://cards.linaro.org/browse/VIRT-49]
by Peter Maydell

Done:
- updated card with a list of sub-subtasks.
- have most of the code for cp15 register migration written.
- in debug phase; there is a case that wasn't considered and
  needs a little thought.
- can run KVM with this code now, need to test migration
  properly.
- GDB is behaving oddly connected to QEMU's stub, need to
  figure out if that's GDB's fault or QEMU's.

Working on:
- debug  patch cleanup.

* QEMU: move CPU migration to vmstate
[http://cards.linaro.org/browse/VIRT-73]
by Peter Maydell

Done.

* kernel: agree on a data structure to describe timer state
[http://cards.linaro.org/browse/VIRT-42]
by Andre Przywara

Working on:
- Peter pointed to an easy way to implement timer state
  saving, indeed great idea, started with implementation.

* kernel: agree on a data structure to hold GIC state
[http://cards.linaro.org/browse/VIRT-44]
by Andre Przywara

Working on:
- starting with VGIC investigation.


* ARMv8 KVM QEMU prototype
[http://cards.linaro.org/browse/CARD-221]
by john Rigby

* Add arm64 mach-virt system model skeleton
[http://cards.linaro.org/browse/VIRT-53]

Done:
- wasted a couple of days chasing a bug in my almost working
  v7 version.
- finished that and submitted patches.
- no new work on arm64 version yet.

* Add creating FDT from scratch to mach-virt system model
[http://cards.linaro.org/browse/VIRT-54]

Done.

* Add kvm guest creation and launching of armv8/mach-virt
[http://cards.linaro.org/browse/VIRT-56]

Done:
- rebased agraf's arm64 patches to upstream and attempted to
  address all comments to original series.
- what is working has been pushed for review.

Working on:
- finalizing patch submission.


* KVM ARMV8 SMP HARDWARE BRING-UP
[http://cards.linaro.org/browse/CARD-555]
by Anup Patel and Pranavkumar Sawargaonkar

Done:
- Sent a patch for virtio early printk and related discussions.
- Got ARM64 Guest (UP) booting on APM board (UP) with few hacky
  cache flushes. Managed to get a 64 bit guest prompt with a
  single cpu host on APM board :)
- Submitted arch_timer patch required for APM ARMv8 SOC and
- Re-submitted revised arch_timer patch to address reviews 
  comments.

Working on:
- Debugging to remove the hacky cache flushes required on APM
  board.
- Try ARM64 Guest (UP) on APM board (SMP).
- Continue patch submission for KVM ARMv8 on APM board.


* XEN - MULTI-PLATFORM ARMV7 BINARIES
[http://cards.linaro.org/browse/CARD-560]
by Jullien Grall

Done:
- clean up xen common tree for ARM.
- begin to introduce xen early printk for linux on ARM.
- patch series for multiple platform in Xen.
- send it and comments are good so far.

Working on:
- Sending a new version of the patch series. We want to support
  the arndale board on Xen 4.4 which is due in June.
- Use linux 3.9 with the Arndale on Xen.


* CI BRING UP: KVM ARMv7
[http://cards.linaro.org/browse/CARD-233]
by Riku Voipio

Done:
- All enablement work.
- Real tests to be added in the scope of a new card (to be
  created).

Working on:
- Card close out.


-- 
Best Regards,
Serge Broslavsky serge.broslav...@linaro.org

Project Manager, Linaro
M: +37129426328  IRC: ototo  Skype: serge.broslavsky
http://linaro.org | Open source software for ARM SoCs


Re: [ANNOUNCE] linux-linaro kernel schedule for 13.05 published

2013-05-03 Thread Andrey Konovalov

On 05/03/2013 12:47 PM, Jon Medhurst (Tixy) wrote:

On Thu, 2013-05-02 at 22:40 +0400, Andrey Konovalov wrote:

Greetings,

This wiki page:

https://wiki.linaro.org/Platform/DevPlatform/LinuxLinaroKernelSchedule

- is now tracking the linux-linaro kernel rebuilds for 13.05.

v3.9 release based linux-linaro-core-tracking (llct) rebuild has been
published, the tag is llct-20130502.0 . The 13.05 linux-linaro release
will be v3.10-rc3 based,


I think you may have miscalculated. Isn't the merge window 2 weeks long?
In which case, as 3.9 was released this past Monday, we shouldn't expect
-rc1 until May 13th and -rc3 will be in June.


Tixy, yes, you are right. I've corrected the LinuxLinaroKernelSchedule.

The 13.05 linux-linaro release will be v3.10-rc2 based,
The next step is:
May 06: ll rebuild based on llct-20130502.0.

Please let me know if sticking to v3.9 until v3.10-rc1 is out (May 13th) 
is an issue for the topics.


The last llct update for this cycle is scheduled on May 21,
The last linux-linaro update for this cycle is scheduled on May 23.
May 23 is the linux-linaro code freeze for 13.05 (only bug fixes allowed 
after this date).


Thanks,
Andrey


___
linaro-dev mailing list
linaro-dev@lists.linaro.org
http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro-dev


big.LITTLE MP Scheduler test summary week-18

2013-05-03 Thread Naresh Kamboju
Hi,

Week-18 test report big.LITTLE MP :
Here is test result summary for big.LITTLE MP Scheduler test on TC2
platform with Android image

sched_tests.git No of Test Cases Tests Run Tests Pass Tests Fail
Absolute pass rate (%) Failure Analysis/Comments
Regression  2019 19 0 100 %
mpbasicsuite   1410 10 0 100 %
mpcoresuite 10 66 0  100 %
mpextendedsuite 20   10   7 370 %
mploadbalance  2 22 0 100 %


Test build:
tests_userdata.tar.bz2
tests_system.tar.bz2

https://snapshots.linaro.org/android/~linaro-android-restricted/sched-testsuite-13.04-release/2/

Android build:
https://android-build.linaro.org/builds/~linaro-android/vexpress-linaro-mp/#build=278

Linux kernel:
 Linux version 3.9.0-rc7-00180-gbab4eb6 (jenkins-build@ip-10-62-13
0-217) (gcc version 4.7.3 20130328 (prerelease) (Linaro GCC
4.7-2013.04) ) #1 SMP Fri May 3 04:58:04 UTC 2013


Results spread sheet:
https://docs.google.com/a/linaro.org/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0Ai9ggMs8bsGJdER3azBqWGtXNjRwb1UzSnZ4RGg3OUE#gid=17

Best regards
Naresh Kamboju

___
linaro-dev mailing list
linaro-dev@lists.linaro.org
http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro-dev