Re: [Dev] Developer Reference Platform 16.03 differences compared to Debian

2016-04-29 Thread Fathi Boudra 
Hi Riku,

On 29 April 2016 at 16:06, Riku Voipio  wrote:
> One of the goals of RPB is to follow that our changes go back
> upstream. For the next RPB release, a more polished report is planned.
> But to get things started, here's a sample - and to use as baseline to
> compare progress for the 16.06 release. The list of packages is
> collected from db410/alip image with distrodelta script[1]. This lists
> the packages that do not become from Debian (Jessie release) or Debian
> backports:

There's a few glitches that we need to sort out.
For example, we carry 1.0.2g (not 1.0.2d) which has a patch to use
arm64 assembly.

> New packages not in Debian:
>
> 96boards-artwork: 0.6-0linaro1
> 96boards-tools: 0.5
> optee-client: 1.0.1+git5+g89f25ce-1.linarojessie.1
> glshim: 0.41+git20150911.42a7739-0.linarojessie.1
> linaro-artwork: 0.6-0linaro1
> linaro-default-settings: 0.3-0linaro1
> linaro-overlay: 1112.8
> wcnss-config: 1.8
>
> Changed packages:
>
> alsa-lib: 1.0.28-1+linaro1.linarojessie.1
>* add UCM config file for HDMI and HiFi on DB410c
>* add UCM config file for HDMI on IFC6410
>
> chromium-browser: 47.0.2526.16-1.6.linarojessie.1
>* seccomp and namespace fixes
>* patches to compile on arm64/armhf
>
> firmware-nonfree: 20160110-1.linarojessie.1
>* ti-connectivity (updates for HiKey):
>  - Include wl18xx-fw-4 firmware
>  - Add TIInit_11.8.32.bts for bluetooth support
>
> isc-dhcp: 4.3.3-8~linaro1
>* Reverting requirement for debhelper >= 9.20151220
>* Upload to make it work with latest systemd:
>  - https://bugs.96boards.org/show_bug.cgi?id=271
>
> linux: 4.4.0.linaro.104-1.linarojessie.1
>* See kernel changes report (TBD)
>
> No-changes Backports:
>
> apparmor: 2.10-2.linarojessie.1
> binutils: 2.25.90.20160101-1.linarojessie.1
> gdb: 7.10-1.linarojessie.1
> gyp: 0.1+20150913git1f374df9-1.linarojessie.1
> java-common: 2:1.8-53.linarojessie.1
> nodejs: 4.2.2~dfsg-1.1.linarojessie.1
> openssl: 1.0.2d-1.linarojessie.1
> systemd: 228-2.4.linarojessie.3
> sysvinit: 2.88dsf-59.2.linarojessie.1
> util-linux: 2.27.1-1.linarojessie.1
> x265: 1.7-4~bpo8+1.linarojessie.1
> xorg: 1:7.7+11.linarojessie.1
> xorg-server: 2:1.17.3-2.linarojessie.2
> xserver-xorg-video-fbdev: 1:0.4.4-1.linarojessie.1
> xserver-xorg-video-freedreno: 1.4.0-1.linarojessie.1
>
>
> [1] https://github.com/suihkulokki/distrodelta with command
> distrodelta -o Debian 'Debian Backports'
> ___
> Dev mailing list
> d...@lists.96boards.org
> https://lists.96boards.org/mailman/listinfo/dev


Cheers,
-- 
Fathi Boudra
Engineering Manager | Builds and Baselines, Release
Linaro.org | Open source software for ARM SoCs
___
linaro-dev mailing list
linaro-dev@lists.linaro.org
https://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro-dev

[IMPORTANT] Regression after android-review.linaro.org upgrade to Gerrit 2.12.2

2016-04-29 Thread Paul Sokolovsky 
Hello,

Summary: Your SSH username on https://android-review.linaro.org will
now match Linaro username (first.last) after the next login. You local
repository clones need to be updated for new username.

Detailed description:
https://android-review.linaro.org was the first Gerrit server in
Linaro, when there were no central LDAP user database yet. As a result,
there were free-form SSH usernames used, instead of the later standard
first.last as used on all the other Gerrit servers. This inconsistency
was a subject of background concern for Systems team, but of course not
something having enough priority to "fix". However, Gerrit 2.12.2
upgrade started tonight uncovered following issue: Gerrit tries to
synchronize its SSH username setting with LDAP, and fails, as Gerrits
own rules disallow changing of username. The symptom of this is error
"Authentication temporary unavailable" when a user with "old" SSH
username tries to login via browser.

While this can be classified as a Gerrit bug (and previous versions
were smart enough), we'll unlikely find any timely solution to keep
things as they are. So, it makes sense to take a chance of cleaning up
username and making this server follow standard username conventions.
Consequently:

1. All usernames which don't match "first.last" pattern are reset.
2. If you are affected, you won't be able to perform SSH operations
(like git clone/push) until you login via web interface.
3. On the next login via web interface, it will be set to LDAP's
"first.last" value.
4. You will need to update remotes of your existing git clones to new
username (or alternatively, re-clone).
5. If you already use "first.last" SSH username, you're unaffected.

The list of users affected is given below. While it seems long,
majority of enrties there are for people no longer at Linaro, or
for community accounts (which didn't work since we switched to LDAP
anyway). If you need further assistance, please open a ticket at
https://servicedesk.linaro.org/servicedesk/customer/portal/4 .

Thanks,
Paul


 username:Ng
 username:pfefferz
 username:asac
 username:james_w
 username:fgiff
 username:jserv
 username:mabac
 username:deeptik
 username:cyang
 username:mpoirier
 username:ndec
 username:mwaddel
 username:mansson
 username:Sachin
 username:vishalbhoj
 username:suapapa
 username:fabo
 username:pabhishek
 username:cnxsoft
 username:amitdanielk
 username:patrikryd
 username:sangwook
 username:ericm
 username:pundiramit
 username:glandium
 username:eazyigz
 username:tixy
 username:danilo
 username:john
 username:nytowl
 username:tony_tu
 username:Sangwook
 username:StefanEkenberg
 username:uichi
 username:plars
 username:zyga
 username:ruppi
 username:ebenpor
 username:jhkim
 username:Annamalai
 username:markoncomputer
 username:Claude
 username:tianhongwang
 username:rchand00
 username:omarrmz
 username:aviksil
 username:nvl1109
 username:a0132810
 username:pelya
 username:krtaylor
 username:developer4563
 username:yusufbu
 username:dzinman
 username:arussello
 username:mdupuy
 username:williamcharles
 username:aorth
 username:lanaczko
 username:rmcc
 username:kcrudup
 username:kelvin
 username:angelsl
 username:unixmanlinuxboy
 username:Quiter
 username:sourxsunny
 username:pbeeler
 username:anmar
 username:wucongdonglai
 username:bambi
 username:rperier
 username:sgt
 username:roalex
 username:vishveshwarbhat
 username:therbom
 username:rajagopalvenkat
 username:winner00
 username:ramesh
 username:abelloni
 username:sparksco
 username:fahadkdi
 username:ryanharkin
 username:axelfagerstedt
 username:nocoast
 username:milo
 username:fcarpenter
 username:hongbozhang
 username:fahadk
 username:pelya2
 username:janjic
 username:dpervushin
 username:qoowater
 username:cerial
 username:tinojantony
 username:stephan
 username:kishoreboddu
 username:nuclearmistake
 username:SanjasdfsafsffaySinghsdfasfRawat
 username:donvigo
 username:tinojgit
 username:afarah
 username:mechmetal
 username:akbennett
 username:c
 username:sikuner
 username:wasungkim
 username:stevanr
 username:deqiang
 username:anilkumar
 username:willnewton
 username:codeart
 username:lrabiet
 username:Bintian
 username:bintian
 username:vishalbhoj2
 username:tusharbehera
 username:jbergsag
 username:tgall
 username:amitkhare
 username:neo
 username:paramanands
 username:sumit
 username:danielt
 username:help
 username:XavierHsu
 username:Serban
 username:Z
 username:koenkooi
(127 rows)



-- 
Best Regards,
Paul

Linaro.org | Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: http://www.facebook.com/pages/Linaro
http://twitter.com/#!/linaroorg - http://www.linaro.org/linaro-blog
___
linaro-dev mailing list
linaro-dev@lists.linaro.org
https://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro-dev

Re: Developer Reference Platform 16.03 differences compared to Debian

2016-04-29 Thread Al Stone 
On 04/29/2016 07:06 AM, Riku Voipio wrote:
> One of the goals of RPB is to follow that our changes go back
> upstream. For the next RPB release, a more polished report is planned.
> But to get things started, here's a sample - and to use as baseline to
> compare progress for the 16.06 release. The list of packages is
> collected from db410/alip image with distrodelta script[1]. This lists
> the packages that do not become from Debian (Jessie release) or Debian
> backports:
> [snip...]

Interesting.  When can we expect to see a similar list for CentOS and/or
Fedora?

-- 
ciao,
al
---
Al Stone
Software Engineer
Linaro Enterprise Group
al.st...@linaro.org
---
___
linaro-dev mailing list
linaro-dev@lists.linaro.org
https://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro-dev

Re: [Dev] Developer Reference Platform 16.03 differences compared to Debian

2016-04-29 Thread Ricardo Salveti 
On Fri, Apr 29, 2016 at 11:05 AM, Nicolas Dechesne
 wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 29, 2016 at 3:56 PM, Ricardo Salveti
>  wrote:
>>
>>> wcnss-config: 1.8
>>> optee-client: 1.0.1+git5+g89f25ce-1.linarojessie.1
>>> glshim: 0.41+git20150911.42a7739-0.linarojessie.1
>>
>> We should be able to get these in debian.
>
> wcnss-config shouldn't go upstream, imho. at least not in its current
> form. it does 2 things:
> 1. create a single WLAN mac address based on some pseudo unique ID
> available on the board
> 2. loads/starts WLAN and BT
>
> #1 is not strictly needed, as the driver would default to using a
> random MAC. and I don't think what we do is nice enough to be
> upstream... we can discuss more..
>
> #2 we at least need to wait for the underlying kernel drivers to reach
> mainline before we upstream (which should be soon), the method to
> start/load the firmware will change.

That is true, forgot this package was mainly responsible for setting
up the mac address for the board.

>>> Changed packages:
>>>
>>> alsa-lib: 1.0.28-1+linaro1.linarojessie.1
>>>* add UCM config file for HDMI and HiFi on DB410c
>>>* add UCM config file for HDMI on IFC6410
>>
>> Good one for upstreaming.
>>
>> Nico, did you get to send those to the upstream alsa/ucm project?
>
> yeah, we talked about that. Fathi said he will take care of it, he was
> planning to submit the config files for Bugglegum, we will do them at
> the same time. We might need some clean up first though.

Great, thanks for the update.

Cheers,
-- 
Ricardo Salveti
___
linaro-dev mailing list
linaro-dev@lists.linaro.org
https://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro-dev

Re: [Dev] Developer Reference Platform 16.03 differences compared to Debian

2016-04-29 Thread Nicolas Dechesne 
On Fri, Apr 29, 2016 at 3:56 PM, Ricardo Salveti
 wrote:
>
>> wcnss-config: 1.8
>> optee-client: 1.0.1+git5+g89f25ce-1.linarojessie.1
>> glshim: 0.41+git20150911.42a7739-0.linarojessie.1
>
> We should be able to get these in debian.

wcnss-config shouldn't go upstream, imho. at least not in its current
form. it does 2 things:
1. create a single WLAN mac address based on some pseudo unique ID
available on the board
2. loads/starts WLAN and BT

#1 is not strictly needed, as the driver would default to using a
random MAC. and I don't think what we do is nice enough to be
upstream... we can discuss more..

#2 we at least need to wait for the underlying kernel drivers to reach
mainline before we upstream (which should be soon), the method to
start/load the firmware will change.

>
>> Changed packages:
>>
>> alsa-lib: 1.0.28-1+linaro1.linarojessie.1
>>* add UCM config file for HDMI and HiFi on DB410c
>>* add UCM config file for HDMI on IFC6410
>
> Good one for upstreaming.
>
> Nico, did you get to send those to the upstream alsa/ucm project?

yeah, we talked about that. Fathi said he will take care of it, he was
planning to submit the config files for Bugglegum, we will do them at
the same time. We might need some clean up first though.
___
linaro-dev mailing list
linaro-dev@lists.linaro.org
https://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro-dev

Re: [Dev] Developer Reference Platform 16.03 differences compared to Debian

2016-04-29 Thread Ricardo Salveti 
On Fri, Apr 29, 2016 at 10:21 AM, Nicolas Dechesne
 wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 29, 2016 at 3:06 PM, Riku Voipio  wrote:
>> One of the goals of RPB is to follow that our changes go back
>> upstream. For the next RPB release, a more polished report is planned.
>> But to get things started, here's a sample - and to use as baseline to
>> compare progress for the 16.06 release. The list of packages is
>> collected from db410/alip image with distrodelta script[1]. This lists
>> the packages that do not become from Debian (Jessie release) or Debian
>> backports:
>
> good stuff. Can this be added to Jenkins as part of the images builds?
> or does it have to run on the target after the fact?

That would indeed be quite cool to have!

Cheers,
-- 
Ricardo Salveti
___
linaro-dev mailing list
linaro-dev@lists.linaro.org
https://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro-dev

Re: [Dev] Developer Reference Platform 16.03 differences compared to Debian

2016-04-29 Thread Ricardo Salveti 
On Fri, Apr 29, 2016 at 10:06 AM, Riku Voipio  wrote:
> One of the goals of RPB is to follow that our changes go back
> upstream. For the next RPB release, a more polished report is planned.
> But to get things started, here's a sample - and to use as baseline to
> compare progress for the 16.06 release. The list of packages is
> collected from db410/alip image with distrodelta script[1]. This lists
> the packages that do not become from Debian (Jessie release) or Debian
> backports:

Thanks for doing and publishing the report.

> New packages not in Debian:
>
> 96boards-artwork: 0.6-0linaro1
> 96boards-tools: 0.5
> linaro-artwork: 0.6-0linaro1
> linaro-default-settings: 0.3-0linaro1
> linaro-overlay: 1112.8

Expect these ones to be in our repo for a bit more. Tools might be
useful outside of it, but the others are custom related artwork and
settings.

> wcnss-config: 1.8
> optee-client: 1.0.1+git5+g89f25ce-1.linarojessie.1
> glshim: 0.41+git20150911.42a7739-0.linarojessie.1

We should be able to get these in debian.

> Changed packages:
>
> alsa-lib: 1.0.28-1+linaro1.linarojessie.1
>* add UCM config file for HDMI and HiFi on DB410c
>* add UCM config file for HDMI on IFC6410

Good one for upstreaming.

Nico, did you get to send those to the upstream alsa/ucm project?

> chromium-browser: 47.0.2526.16-1.6.linarojessie.1
>* seccomp and namespace fixes
>* patches to compile on arm64/armhf

What is the upstreaming state here?

> firmware-nonfree: 20160110-1.linarojessie.1
>* ti-connectivity (updates for HiKey):
>  - Include wl18xx-fw-4 firmware

https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=816350

>  - Add TIInit_11.8.32.bts for bluetooth support

Got in contact with the maintainer, and there is no interest in
pushing this to the upstream linux-firmware tree. We could try doing
that, otherwise it might need to end up in a different package.

> isc-dhcp: 4.3.3-8~linaro1
>* Reverting requirement for debhelper >= 9.20151220
>* Upload to make it work with latest systemd:
>  - https://bugs.96boards.org/show_bug.cgi?id=271
>
> linux: 4.4.0.linaro.104-1.linarojessie.1
>* See kernel changes report (TBD)

This will always be around, used for development.

> No-changes Backports:
>
> apparmor: 2.10-2.linarojessie.1
> binutils: 2.25.90.20160101-1.linarojessie.1
> gdb: 7.10-1.linarojessie.1
> gyp: 0.1+20150913git1f374df9-1.linarojessie.1
> java-common: 2:1.8-53.linarojessie.1
> nodejs: 4.2.2~dfsg-1.1.linarojessie.1
> openssl: 1.0.2d-1.linarojessie.1
> systemd: 228-2.4.linarojessie.3
> sysvinit: 2.88dsf-59.2.linarojessie.1
> util-linux: 2.27.1-1.linarojessie.1
> x265: 1.7-4~bpo8+1.linarojessie.1
> xorg: 1:7.7+11.linarojessie.1
> xorg-server: 2:1.17.3-2.linarojessie.2
> xserver-xorg-video-fbdev: 1:0.4.4-1.linarojessie.1
> xserver-xorg-video-freedreno: 1.4.0-1.linarojessie.1

Thanks,
-- 
Ricardo Salveti
___
linaro-dev mailing list
linaro-dev@lists.linaro.org
https://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro-dev

Re: [Dev] Developer Reference Platform 16.03 differences compared to Debian

2016-04-29 Thread Nicolas Dechesne 
On Fri, Apr 29, 2016 at 3:06 PM, Riku Voipio  wrote:
> One of the goals of RPB is to follow that our changes go back
> upstream. For the next RPB release, a more polished report is planned.
> But to get things started, here's a sample - and to use as baseline to
> compare progress for the 16.06 release. The list of packages is
> collected from db410/alip image with distrodelta script[1]. This lists
> the packages that do not become from Debian (Jessie release) or Debian
> backports:

good stuff. Can this be added to Jenkins as part of the images builds?
or does it have to run on the target after the fact?
___
linaro-dev mailing list
linaro-dev@lists.linaro.org
https://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro-dev

Developer Reference Platform 16.03 differences compared to Debian

2016-04-29 Thread Riku Voipio 
One of the goals of RPB is to follow that our changes go back
upstream. For the next RPB release, a more polished report is planned.
But to get things started, here's a sample - and to use as baseline to
compare progress for the 16.06 release. The list of packages is
collected from db410/alip image with distrodelta script[1]. This lists
the packages that do not become from Debian (Jessie release) or Debian
backports:

New packages not in Debian:

96boards-artwork: 0.6-0linaro1
96boards-tools: 0.5
optee-client: 1.0.1+git5+g89f25ce-1.linarojessie.1
glshim: 0.41+git20150911.42a7739-0.linarojessie.1
linaro-artwork: 0.6-0linaro1
linaro-default-settings: 0.3-0linaro1
linaro-overlay: 1112.8
wcnss-config: 1.8

Changed packages:

alsa-lib: 1.0.28-1+linaro1.linarojessie.1
   * add UCM config file for HDMI and HiFi on DB410c
   * add UCM config file for HDMI on IFC6410

chromium-browser: 47.0.2526.16-1.6.linarojessie.1
   * seccomp and namespace fixes
   * patches to compile on arm64/armhf

firmware-nonfree: 20160110-1.linarojessie.1
   * ti-connectivity (updates for HiKey):
 - Include wl18xx-fw-4 firmware
 - Add TIInit_11.8.32.bts for bluetooth support

isc-dhcp: 4.3.3-8~linaro1
   * Reverting requirement for debhelper >= 9.20151220
   * Upload to make it work with latest systemd:
 - https://bugs.96boards.org/show_bug.cgi?id=271

linux: 4.4.0.linaro.104-1.linarojessie.1
   * See kernel changes report (TBD)

No-changes Backports:

apparmor: 2.10-2.linarojessie.1
binutils: 2.25.90.20160101-1.linarojessie.1
gdb: 7.10-1.linarojessie.1
gyp: 0.1+20150913git1f374df9-1.linarojessie.1
java-common: 2:1.8-53.linarojessie.1
nodejs: 4.2.2~dfsg-1.1.linarojessie.1
openssl: 1.0.2d-1.linarojessie.1
systemd: 228-2.4.linarojessie.3
sysvinit: 2.88dsf-59.2.linarojessie.1
util-linux: 2.27.1-1.linarojessie.1
x265: 1.7-4~bpo8+1.linarojessie.1
xorg: 1:7.7+11.linarojessie.1
xorg-server: 2:1.17.3-2.linarojessie.2
xserver-xorg-video-fbdev: 1:0.4.4-1.linarojessie.1
xserver-xorg-video-freedreno: 1.4.0-1.linarojessie.1


[1] https://github.com/suihkulokki/distrodelta with command
distrodelta -o Debian 'Debian Backports'
___
linaro-dev mailing list
linaro-dev@lists.linaro.org
https://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro-dev

Re: JITs and 52-bit VA

2016-04-29 Thread Alexandre Rames 
For info Google v8 Javascript uses the bottom bit to tag pointers. One
problem with this mechanism though is that the pointers can only be used
directly with unscaled offset memory access instructions (LDUR/STUR). So in
particular, no LDP/STP.

On 28 April 2016 at 22:41, Wookey  wrote:

> +++ Adhemerval Zanella [2016-04-28 12:07 -0300]:
> > I do not think this issue is inherent to all JIT implements, but rather
> to
> > luajit with its NaN-tagging scheme [1] which packs different types of
> objects
> > in a 8-byte.
>
> Other jits use the same/similar schemes (mozilla's ionmonkey is one
> AIUI). Not sure how many others do this, or how many JITs do it a
> different way. BUt it is certainly wider than just luajit.
>
> Wookey
> --
> Principal hats:  Linaro, Debian, Wookware, ARM
> http://wookware.org/
>
> ___
> linaro-dev mailing list
> linaro-dev@lists.linaro.org
> https://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro-dev
>
>


-- 
Alexandre Rames
+44 1223 400 25452
___
linaro-dev mailing list
linaro-dev@lists.linaro.org
https://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro-dev