Re: Marking a toolchain or build releasable - for saving.
On 12 August 2011 10:08, Paul Sokolovsky wrote: > On Fri, 12 Aug 2011 18:05:29 +0300 > Paul Sokolovsky wrote: > >> On Fri, 12 Aug 2011 09:01:14 -0500 >> Zach Pfeffer wrote: >> >> > Oh, the other thing is to generate the pinned-manifest.xml before >> > the build is made so that the build comes from the pinned-manifest. >> > This'll save us a step. >> >> One reliable way to do this is tagging, like I argued the other time. >> We start build with tagging all components with (special) tag for this >> builds number. Then checkout exactly that tag (that will be a bit more >> complicated than usual with repo and its manifests), then do build, >> then can reproduce it 100% without recoursing to raw SHA1 revids. If >> one specific build is useful, we can re-tag it "normal" tags. >> Otherwise, those special build tags will be expire after some time t >> avoid pile-up. > > Oh well, but that's complicated by the fact that we have read-only > intermediate mirror for build ;-\ . Right, and that why we need the pinned-manifest.xml I guess. So the idea would be: Generate the pinned-manifest.xml Build from the pinned-manifest.xml If we like the build, we click save that commits the pinned-manifest.xml and the whole thing gets a tag We would have on linaro-master: default.xml panda-stage.xml panda-pinned.xml iMX53-stage.xml iMX53-pinned.xml origen-stage.xml origen-pinned.xml snowball-stage.xml snowball-pinned.xml default.xml, *-stage.xml would be the tips and *-pinned.xml would get commited to when we liked a build. We would know that the build was exactly what we tested since we would have built from the pinned-manifest.xml itself. During a save we would lay a tag down like: 11.08-rc1, 11.08-rc2...and the final tag would be 11.08 which may be coincident to an existing tag or may be a new point in time. -Zach > > -- > Best Regards, > Paul > > Linaro.org | Open source software for ARM SoCs > Follow Linaro: http://www.facebook.com/pages/Linaro > http://twitter.com/#!/linaroorg - http://www.linaro.org/linaro-blog > ___ linaro-dev mailing list linaro-dev@lists.linaro.org http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro-dev
Re: Marking a toolchain or build releasable - for saving.
On Fri, 12 Aug 2011 18:05:29 +0300 Paul Sokolovsky wrote: > On Fri, 12 Aug 2011 09:01:14 -0500 > Zach Pfeffer wrote: > > > Oh, the other thing is to generate the pinned-manifest.xml before > > the build is made so that the build comes from the pinned-manifest. > > This'll save us a step. > > One reliable way to do this is tagging, like I argued the other time. > We start build with tagging all components with (special) tag for this > builds number. Then checkout exactly that tag (that will be a bit more > complicated than usual with repo and its manifests), then do build, > then can reproduce it 100% without recoursing to raw SHA1 revids. If > one specific build is useful, we can re-tag it "normal" tags. > Otherwise, those special build tags will be expire after some time t > avoid pile-up. Oh well, but that's complicated by the fact that we have read-only intermediate mirror for build ;-\ . -- Best Regards, Paul Linaro.org | Open source software for ARM SoCs Follow Linaro: http://www.facebook.com/pages/Linaro http://twitter.com/#!/linaroorg - http://www.linaro.org/linaro-blog ___ linaro-dev mailing list linaro-dev@lists.linaro.org http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro-dev
Re: Marking a toolchain or build releasable - for saving.
On Fri, 12 Aug 2011 09:01:14 -0500 Zach Pfeffer wrote: > Oh, the other thing is to generate the pinned-manifest.xml before the > build is made so that the build comes from the pinned-manifest. > This'll save us a step. One reliable way to do this is tagging, like I argued the other time. We start build with tagging all components with (special) tag for this builds number. Then checkout exactly that tag (that will be a bit more complicated than usual with repo and its manifests), then do build, then can reproduce it 100% without recoursing to raw SHA1 revids. If one specific build is useful, we can re-tag it "normal" tags. Otherwise, those special build tags will be expire after some time t avoid pile-up. > > On 11 August 2011 22:26, Zach Pfeffer wrote: > > Paul, > > > > I was wondering if we could make a small change to android-build. I > > just recently tested: > > > > https://android-build.linaro.org/builds/~linaro-android/leb-panda/#build=166 > > > > It works great and I'd like to move it to a first 11.08 release. Its > > based on toolchain: > > > > https://android-build.linaro.org/jenkins/job/linaro-android_toolchain-4.6-2011.07/8/artifact/build/out/android-toolchain-eabi-linaro-4.6-2011.07-0-8-2011-07-25_12-42-06-linux-x86.tar.bz2 > > > > I'd like to simply mark this build as "releasable" and have it save > > the toolchain and commit the pinned-manifest.xml to 11.08. > > > > Any thoughts? > > > > -Zach > > -- Best Regards, Paul Linaro.org | Open source software for ARM SoCs Follow Linaro: http://www.facebook.com/pages/Linaro http://twitter.com/#!/linaroorg - http://www.linaro.org/linaro-blog ___ linaro-dev mailing list linaro-dev@lists.linaro.org http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro-dev
Re: Marking a toolchain or build releasable - for saving.
On Thu, 11 Aug 2011 22:26:15 -0500 Zach Pfeffer wrote: > Paul, > > I was wondering if we could make a small change to android-build. I > just recently tested: > > https://android-build.linaro.org/builds/~linaro-android/leb-panda/#build=166 > > It works great and I'd like to move it to a first 11.08 release. Its > based on toolchain: > > https://android-build.linaro.org/jenkins/job/linaro-android_toolchain-4.6-2011.07/8/artifact/build/out/android-toolchain-eabi-linaro-4.6-2011.07-0-8-2011-07-25_12-42-06-linux-x86.tar.bz2 > > I'd like to simply mark this build as "releasable" and have it save > the toolchain What do you mean by "save the toolchain" here? > and commit the pinned-manifest.xml to 11.08. > > Any thoughts? I guess I'm thinking like asac now, so "Sounds good, worth being blueprinted, let's see if it fits 11.09". Actually, I'd be able to start with it even for 11.08, if there will be room between Gerrit switchover and LAVA integration work. > > -Zach -- Best Regards, Paul Linaro.org | Open source software for ARM SoCs Follow Linaro: http://www.facebook.com/pages/Linaro http://twitter.com/#!/linaroorg - http://www.linaro.org/linaro-blog ___ linaro-dev mailing list linaro-dev@lists.linaro.org http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro-dev
Re: Marking a toolchain or build releasable - for saving.
On Thu, 11 Aug 2011 22:26:15 -0500, Zach Pfeffer wrote: > Paul, > > I was wondering if we could make a small change to android-build. I > just recently tested: > > https://android-build.linaro.org/builds/~linaro-android/leb-panda/#build=166 > > It works great and I'd like to move it to a first 11.08 release. Its > based on toolchain: > > https://android-build.linaro.org/jenkins/job/linaro-android_toolchain-4.6-2011.07/8/artifact/build/out/android-toolchain-eabi-linaro-4.6-2011.07-0-8-2011-07-25_12-42-06-linux-x86.tar.bz2 > > I'd like to simply mark this build as "releasable" and have it save > the toolchain and commit the pinned-manifest.xml to 11.08. Hi, What does "commit the pinned-manifest.xml to 11.08" mean? There was discussion at the Connect about replacing the qatracker with something based on LAVA that allowed manual testing results to be added in addition to LAVA's automated testing, and giving a +1/-1 for whether the build is releaseable. I think that any solution here should be considered along with the work that is going on there. Thanks, James ___ linaro-dev mailing list linaro-dev@lists.linaro.org http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro-dev
Re: Marking a toolchain or build releasable - for saving.
Oh, the other thing is to generate the pinned-manifest.xml before the build is made so that the build comes from the pinned-manifest. This'll save us a step. On 11 August 2011 22:26, Zach Pfeffer wrote: > Paul, > > I was wondering if we could make a small change to android-build. I > just recently tested: > > https://android-build.linaro.org/builds/~linaro-android/leb-panda/#build=166 > > It works great and I'd like to move it to a first 11.08 release. Its > based on toolchain: > > https://android-build.linaro.org/jenkins/job/linaro-android_toolchain-4.6-2011.07/8/artifact/build/out/android-toolchain-eabi-linaro-4.6-2011.07-0-8-2011-07-25_12-42-06-linux-x86.tar.bz2 > > I'd like to simply mark this build as "releasable" and have it save > the toolchain and commit the pinned-manifest.xml to 11.08. > > Any thoughts? > > -Zach > ___ linaro-dev mailing list linaro-dev@lists.linaro.org http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro-dev
Marking a toolchain or build releasable - for saving.
Paul, I was wondering if we could make a small change to android-build. I just recently tested: https://android-build.linaro.org/builds/~linaro-android/leb-panda/#build=166 It works great and I'd like to move it to a first 11.08 release. Its based on toolchain: https://android-build.linaro.org/jenkins/job/linaro-android_toolchain-4.6-2011.07/8/artifact/build/out/android-toolchain-eabi-linaro-4.6-2011.07-0-8-2011-07-25_12-42-06-linux-x86.tar.bz2 I'd like to simply mark this build as "releasable" and have it save the toolchain and commit the pinned-manifest.xml to 11.08. Any thoughts? -Zach ___ linaro-dev mailing list linaro-dev@lists.linaro.org http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro-dev
