Some more comments on CI loop interface

2011-11-08 Thread Deepak Saxena
Hi Michael,

I went to take a look at the kernel ci-loop page to see the build
status of upstream builds and have a few new comments on
the UIL

1) When there is a build failure, is it possible to have
 the build link go directly to the build results?
 It currently takes 3 clicks to get to the results
 from the main page and it may not be obvious to
 someone that the consoleText attachment
 is the correct link to use.

2) From the main ci-loop page, how do I get to
a link for the RSS feed? Are the RSS feeds
per-tree or per (tree + defconfig) combination?
The later is preferred from the perspective of
having upstream sub-arch maintainers who
want to watch specific platforms.

Thanks,
~Deepak

___
linaro-dev mailing list
linaro-dev@lists.linaro.org
http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro-dev


Re: Some more comments on CI loop interface

2011-11-08 Thread Nicolas Pitre
On Tue, 8 Nov 2011, Deepak Saxena wrote:

 Hi Michael,
 
 I went to take a look at the kernel ci-loop page to see the build
 status of upstream builds ...

FYI, the venerable ARM kautobuild run by Vincent Sanders was shut down a 
while ago.

http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.ports.arm.kernel/139303

This means there is now a real hole to fill.  Given that Linaro's ci 
infrastructure has more resources, it hopefully will be more useful too.  
One thing that I didn't like much about kautobuild is that it only 
coalesced all build results into a single report instead of having a per 
config failure report sent to the appropriate maintainer.

Should we try to advertise Linaro's plans more widely?


Nicolas

___
linaro-dev mailing list
linaro-dev@lists.linaro.org
http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro-dev


Re: Some more comments on CI loop interface

2011-11-08 Thread Nicolas Pitre
On Tue, 8 Nov 2011, Deepak Saxena wrote:

 On 8 November 2011 14:10, Nicolas Pitre nicolas.pi...@linaro.org wrote:
  On Tue, 8 Nov 2011, Deepak Saxena wrote:
 
  Hi Michael,
 
  I went to take a look at the kernel ci-loop page to see the build
  status of upstream builds ...
 
  FYI, the venerable ARM kautobuild run by Vincent Sanders was shut down a
  while ago.
 
  http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.ports.arm.kernel/139303
 
  This means there is now a real hole to fill.  Given that Linaro's ci
  infrastructure has more resources, it hopefully will be more useful too.
  One thing that I didn't like much about kautobuild is that it only
  coalesced all build results into a single report instead of having a per
  config failure report sent to the appropriate maintainer.
 
  Should we try to advertise Linaro's plans more widely?
 
 What I'd like to do is get this being used regularly by Arnd and
 also the TI maintainers first (as they've expressed some interest
 in it). Once that's up and running, we can reach out to other sub-architecture
 maintainers and figure out which trees/configs we want to build. I'd
 rather get the kinks sorted out with a small group than
 opening up to lots of people at once.

I was thinking more about letting people know what we are up to, not 
necessarily open the system to anyone yet.


Nicolas___
linaro-dev mailing list
linaro-dev@lists.linaro.org
http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro-dev


Re: Some more comments on CI loop interface

2011-11-08 Thread Michael Hudson-Doyle
On Tue, 8 Nov 2011 12:56:39 -0800, Deepak Saxena dsax...@linaro.org wrote:
 Hi Michael,
 
 I went to take a look at the kernel ci-loop page to see the build
 status of upstream builds and have a few new comments on
 the UIL
 
 1) When there is a build failure, is it possible to have
  the build link go directly to the build results?
  It currently takes 3 clicks to get to the results
  from the main page and it may not be obvious to
  someone that the consoleText attachment
  is the correct link to use.

Yeah, this is pretty terrible currently.  It's already reported though:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/lava-kernel-ci-views/+bug/876010

 2) From the main ci-loop page, how do I get to
 a link for the RSS feed? Are the RSS feeds
 per-tree or per (tree + defconfig) combination?
 The later is preferred from the perspective of
 having upstream sub-arch maintainers who
 want to watch specific platforms.

The only RSS feeds we have right now are from Jenkins, so start at:
https://ci.linaro.org

Cheers,
mwh

___
linaro-dev mailing list
linaro-dev@lists.linaro.org
http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro-dev