[ACTIVITY] report week ending Jan 19
Progress: * UM-2 [QEMU upstream maintainership] - patch review: + v4 of the raspi-4 SoC/board model series (this is a big one) + bug in calculation of limit address in designware pci controller model + imx7 serial device: implementation of FIFO and ageing timer + patchset to reduce size of fdt blob - started looking at some of my old device/bus reset cleanup patches, since another dev on-list was running into a potential issue that they might help to solve. Failed to repro the test failure that was the reason I put them on the back burner, so sent them out to the list as-is... * QEMU-598 [Model the MPS3-AN536 dual-Cortex-R52 FPGA image] - updated the SCC device to handle the AN536 specifics (most actual behaviour will be unimplemented, as we do for our other board models that have this device) - checked that we don't need to make any changes to the ioregs device; the existing model is flexible enough we can configure it to match the AN536 specifics - wrote the initial skeleton of the board model (which only creates the RAM and ROM regions for the moment) - realized that it might be better to wait for Philippe's reworking of hw/cpu/a15mpcore.c and friends before adding another similar object for the Cortex-R52 thanks -- PMM ___ linaro-toolchain mailing list -- linaro-toolchain@lists.linaro.org To unsubscribe send an email to linaro-toolchain-le...@lists.linaro.org
Re: [Linaro-TCWG-CI] gcc patch #83662: FAIL: 8 regressions on arm
On Fri, Jan 19, 2024 at 6:05 AM Maxim Kuvyrkov wrote: > > > On Jan 19, 2024, at 17:31, H.J. Lu wrote: > > > > On Thu, Jan 18, 2024 at 11:15 PM Maxim Kuvyrkov > > wrote: > >> > >> Hi H.J., > >> > >> Did the email below made it to your inbox? I wonder if some of our > >> precommit CI emails are not reaching developers. > > > > It has been fixed before the email. > > Linaro pre-commit CI sent you below regression report on Jan 10. Then you > committed the patch on Jan 18. Then later on Jan 18 Linaro post-commit CI > sent you another report. I missed the first email on Jan 10. I noticed the second one. > My question is whether the first report from precommit CI reached your inbox. > If not, then I'll troubleshoot our email configuration. I got both. > Kind regards, > > -- > Maxim Kuvyrkov > https://www.linaro.org > > > > > >> Kind regards, > >> > >> -- > >> Maxim Kuvyrkov > >> https://www.linaro.org > >> > >>> On Jan 10, 2024, at 02:24, ci_not...@linaro.org wrote: > >>> > >>> Dear contributor, our automatic CI has detected problems related to your > >>> patch(es). Please find some details below. If you have any questions, > >>> please follow up on linaro-toolchain@lists.linaro.org mailing list, > >>> Libera's #linaro-tcwg channel, or ping your favourite Linaro toolchain > >>> developer on the usual project channel. > >>> > >>> We appreciate that it might be difficult to find the necessary logs or > >>> reproduce the issue locally. If you can't get what you need from our CI > >>> within minutes, let us know and we will be happy to help. > >>> > >>> In gcc_check master-arm after: > >>> > >>> | gcc patch https://patchwork.sourceware.org/patch/83662 > >>> | Author: H.J. Lu > >>> | Date: Tue Jan 9 08:46:59 2024 -0800 > >>> | > >>> | hwasan: Check if Intel LAM_U57 is enabled > >>> | > >>> | When -fsanitize=hwaddress is used, libhwasan will try to enable > >>> LAM_U57 > >>> | in the startup code. Update the target check to enable hwaddress > >>> tests > >>> | if LAM_U57 is enabled. Also compile hwaddress tests with -mlam=u57 > >>> on > >>> | x86-64 since hwasan requires LAM_U57 on x86-64. > >>> | > >>> | ... 3 lines of the commit log omitted. > >>> | ... applied on top of baseline commit: > >>> | 9f7afa99c67 [committed] Adding missing prototype for __clzhi2 to > >>> xstormy port > >>> > >>> FAIL: 8 regressions > >>> > >>> regressions.sum: > >>> === g++ tests === > >>> > >>> Running g++:g++.dg/hwasan/hwasan.exp ... > >>> ERROR: can't read "target_hwasan_flags": no such variable > >>> ERROR: tcl error code TCL LOOKUP VARNAME target_hwasan_flags > >>> ERROR: tcl error sourcing g++.dg/hwasan/hwasan.exp. > >>> UNRESOLVED: testcase g++.dg/hwasan/hwasan.exp' aborted due to Tcl error > >>> === gcc tests === > >>> > >>> Running gcc:gcc.dg/hwasan/hwasan.exp ... > >>> ... and 6 more entries > >>> > >>> You can find the failure logs in *.log.1.xz files in > >>> - > >>> https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gcc_check--master-arm-precommit/5612/artifact/artifacts/artifacts.precommit/00-sumfiles/ > >>> . > >>> The full lists of regressions and progressions are in > >>> - > >>> https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gcc_check--master-arm-precommit/5612/artifact/artifacts/artifacts.precommit/notify/ > >>> . > >>> The list of [ignored] baseline and flaky failures are in > >>> - > >>> https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gcc_check--master-arm-precommit/5612/artifact/artifacts/artifacts.precommit/sumfiles/xfails.xfail > >>> . > >>> > >>> The configuration of this build is: > >>> CI config tcwg_gcc_check master-arm > >>> > >>> -8<--8<--8<-- > >>> The information below can be used to reproduce a debug environment: > >>> > >>> Current build : > >>> https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gcc_check--master-arm-precommit/5612/artifact/artifacts > >>> Reference build : > >>> https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gcc_check--master-arm-build/1542/artifact/artifacts > >> > >> > > > > > > -- > > H.J. > -- H.J. ___ linaro-toolchain mailing list -- linaro-toolchain@lists.linaro.org To unsubscribe send an email to linaro-toolchain-le...@lists.linaro.org
Re: [Linaro-TCWG-CI] gcc patch #83662: FAIL: 8 regressions on arm
> On Jan 19, 2024, at 17:31, H.J. Lu wrote: > > On Thu, Jan 18, 2024 at 11:15 PM Maxim Kuvyrkov > wrote: >> >> Hi H.J., >> >> Did the email below made it to your inbox? I wonder if some of our >> precommit CI emails are not reaching developers. > > It has been fixed before the email. Linaro pre-commit CI sent you below regression report on Jan 10. Then you committed the patch on Jan 18. Then later on Jan 18 Linaro post-commit CI sent you another report. My question is whether the first report from precommit CI reached your inbox. If not, then I'll troubleshoot our email configuration. Kind regards, -- Maxim Kuvyrkov https://www.linaro.org > >> Kind regards, >> >> -- >> Maxim Kuvyrkov >> https://www.linaro.org >> >>> On Jan 10, 2024, at 02:24, ci_not...@linaro.org wrote: >>> >>> Dear contributor, our automatic CI has detected problems related to your >>> patch(es). Please find some details below. If you have any questions, >>> please follow up on linaro-toolchain@lists.linaro.org mailing list, >>> Libera's #linaro-tcwg channel, or ping your favourite Linaro toolchain >>> developer on the usual project channel. >>> >>> We appreciate that it might be difficult to find the necessary logs or >>> reproduce the issue locally. If you can't get what you need from our CI >>> within minutes, let us know and we will be happy to help. >>> >>> In gcc_check master-arm after: >>> >>> | gcc patch https://patchwork.sourceware.org/patch/83662 >>> | Author: H.J. Lu >>> | Date: Tue Jan 9 08:46:59 2024 -0800 >>> | >>> | hwasan: Check if Intel LAM_U57 is enabled >>> | >>> | When -fsanitize=hwaddress is used, libhwasan will try to enable >>> LAM_U57 >>> | in the startup code. Update the target check to enable hwaddress >>> tests >>> | if LAM_U57 is enabled. Also compile hwaddress tests with -mlam=u57 on >>> | x86-64 since hwasan requires LAM_U57 on x86-64. >>> | >>> | ... 3 lines of the commit log omitted. >>> | ... applied on top of baseline commit: >>> | 9f7afa99c67 [committed] Adding missing prototype for __clzhi2 to xstormy >>> port >>> >>> FAIL: 8 regressions >>> >>> regressions.sum: >>> === g++ tests === >>> >>> Running g++:g++.dg/hwasan/hwasan.exp ... >>> ERROR: can't read "target_hwasan_flags": no such variable >>> ERROR: tcl error code TCL LOOKUP VARNAME target_hwasan_flags >>> ERROR: tcl error sourcing g++.dg/hwasan/hwasan.exp. >>> UNRESOLVED: testcase g++.dg/hwasan/hwasan.exp' aborted due to Tcl error >>> === gcc tests === >>> >>> Running gcc:gcc.dg/hwasan/hwasan.exp ... >>> ... and 6 more entries >>> >>> You can find the failure logs in *.log.1.xz files in >>> - >>> https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gcc_check--master-arm-precommit/5612/artifact/artifacts/artifacts.precommit/00-sumfiles/ >>> . >>> The full lists of regressions and progressions are in >>> - >>> https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gcc_check--master-arm-precommit/5612/artifact/artifacts/artifacts.precommit/notify/ >>> . >>> The list of [ignored] baseline and flaky failures are in >>> - >>> https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gcc_check--master-arm-precommit/5612/artifact/artifacts/artifacts.precommit/sumfiles/xfails.xfail >>> . >>> >>> The configuration of this build is: >>> CI config tcwg_gcc_check master-arm >>> >>> -8<--8<--8<-- >>> The information below can be used to reproduce a debug environment: >>> >>> Current build : >>> https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gcc_check--master-arm-precommit/5612/artifact/artifacts >>> Reference build : >>> https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gcc_check--master-arm-build/1542/artifact/artifacts >> >> > > > -- > H.J. ___ linaro-toolchain mailing list -- linaro-toolchain@lists.linaro.org To unsubscribe send an email to linaro-toolchain-le...@lists.linaro.org
Re: [Linaro-TCWG-CI] gcc patch #83662: FAIL: 8 regressions on arm
On Thu, Jan 18, 2024 at 11:15 PM Maxim Kuvyrkov wrote: > > Hi H.J., > > Did the email below made it to your inbox? I wonder if some of our precommit > CI emails are not reaching developers. It has been fixed before the email. > Kind regards, > > -- > Maxim Kuvyrkov > https://www.linaro.org > > > On Jan 10, 2024, at 02:24, ci_not...@linaro.org wrote: > > > > Dear contributor, our automatic CI has detected problems related to your > > patch(es). Please find some details below. If you have any questions, > > please follow up on linaro-toolchain@lists.linaro.org mailing list, > > Libera's #linaro-tcwg channel, or ping your favourite Linaro toolchain > > developer on the usual project channel. > > > > We appreciate that it might be difficult to find the necessary logs or > > reproduce the issue locally. If you can't get what you need from our CI > > within minutes, let us know and we will be happy to help. > > > > In gcc_check master-arm after: > > > > | gcc patch https://patchwork.sourceware.org/patch/83662 > > | Author: H.J. Lu > > | Date: Tue Jan 9 08:46:59 2024 -0800 > > | > > | hwasan: Check if Intel LAM_U57 is enabled > > | > > | When -fsanitize=hwaddress is used, libhwasan will try to enable > > LAM_U57 > > | in the startup code. Update the target check to enable hwaddress > > tests > > | if LAM_U57 is enabled. Also compile hwaddress tests with -mlam=u57 > > on > > | x86-64 since hwasan requires LAM_U57 on x86-64. > > | > > | ... 3 lines of the commit log omitted. > > | ... applied on top of baseline commit: > > | 9f7afa99c67 [committed] Adding missing prototype for __clzhi2 to xstormy > > port > > > > FAIL: 8 regressions > > > > regressions.sum: > > === g++ tests === > > > > Running g++:g++.dg/hwasan/hwasan.exp ... > > ERROR: can't read "target_hwasan_flags": no such variable > > ERROR: tcl error code TCL LOOKUP VARNAME target_hwasan_flags > > ERROR: tcl error sourcing g++.dg/hwasan/hwasan.exp. > > UNRESOLVED: testcase g++.dg/hwasan/hwasan.exp' aborted due to Tcl error > > === gcc tests === > > > > Running gcc:gcc.dg/hwasan/hwasan.exp ... > > ... and 6 more entries > > > > You can find the failure logs in *.log.1.xz files in > > - > > https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gcc_check--master-arm-precommit/5612/artifact/artifacts/artifacts.precommit/00-sumfiles/ > > . > > The full lists of regressions and progressions are in > > - > > https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gcc_check--master-arm-precommit/5612/artifact/artifacts/artifacts.precommit/notify/ > > . > > The list of [ignored] baseline and flaky failures are in > > - > > https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gcc_check--master-arm-precommit/5612/artifact/artifacts/artifacts.precommit/sumfiles/xfails.xfail > > . > > > > The configuration of this build is: > > CI config tcwg_gcc_check master-arm > > > > -8<--8<--8<-- > > The information below can be used to reproduce a debug environment: > > > > Current build : > > https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gcc_check--master-arm-precommit/5612/artifact/artifacts > > Reference build : > > https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gcc_check--master-arm-build/1542/artifact/artifacts > > -- H.J. ___ linaro-toolchain mailing list -- linaro-toolchain@lists.linaro.org To unsubscribe send an email to linaro-toolchain-le...@lists.linaro.org
