> On Feb 21, 2024, at 05:46, Tiezhu Yang wrote:
>
>
>
> On 02/21/2024 03:52 AM, ci_not...@linaro.org wrote:
>> If you can't get what you need from our CI within minutes, let us know and
>> we will be happy to help.
>
> We can see "Operation not permitted" in the log info,
> please try one of the following processes to test:
> (1) set ptrace_scope as 0
>$ echo 0 | sudo tee /proc/sys/kernel/yama/ptrace_scope
>$ make check-gdb TESTS="gdb.threads/attach-many-short-lived-threads.exp"
Hi Tiezhu,
We already use the above approach for testing. Also, our CI reports only
regressions, not all failures, and the environment, generally, does not change
whether the test passes or fails.
The problem appears to be the fact that
gdb.threads/attach-many-short-lived-threads.exp tests are flaky, and detected
as such in [1] -- search for "delete all breakpoints". However, because your
patch renames the tests, the flaky entries do not match, and failures are seen
as regressions.
Do the "gdb.threads/attach-many-short-lived-threads.exp: iter " tests pass
reliably for you?
Thanks,
[1]
https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gdb_check--master-arm-precommit/1725/artifact/artifacts/artifacts.precommit/sumfiles/xfails.xfail/*view*/
--
Maxim Kuvyrkov
https://www.linaro.org
___
linaro-toolchain mailing list -- linaro-toolchain@lists.linaro.org
To unsubscribe send an email to linaro-toolchain-le...@lists.linaro.org
