Re: [Linaro-TCWG-CI] FAIL: 10 regressions after gcc commit: 5 commits in gcc
On Sat, 19 Aug 2023 10:47:45 +0400 Maxim Kuvyrkov wrote: > Hi Julian, > > Your patch series causes regressions on aarch64-linux-gnu. Would you > please investigate? > > Let me know if you need any assistance in reproducing these. Hi Maxim! I'm a little confused -- to be clear, those patches aren't committed to mainline yet, are they? If not, thanks for the proactive testing! If so, oops, they've not been reviewed yet (!). I'll take a look. Cheers, Julian ___ linaro-toolchain mailing list -- linaro-toolchain@lists.linaro.org To unsubscribe send an email to linaro-toolchain-le...@lists.linaro.org
Re: [Linaro-TCWG-CI] FAIL: 10 regressions after gcc commit: 5 commits in gcc
> On Aug 21, 2023, at 15:14, Julian Brown wrote: > > On Sat, 19 Aug 2023 10:47:45 +0400 > Maxim Kuvyrkov wrote: > >> Hi Julian, >> >> Your patch series causes regressions on aarch64-linux-gnu. Would you >> please investigate? >> >> Let me know if you need any assistance in reproducing these. > > Hi Maxim! > > I'm a little confused -- to be clear, those patches aren't committed to > mainline yet, are they? If not, thanks for the proactive testing! If > so, oops, they've not been reviewed yet (!). Hi Julian, We (Linaro) are working on pre-commit testing for AArch64 and AArch32, and your patch was flagged [1]. [1] https://patchwork.sourceware.org/project/gcc/patch/b32f791688b577bf57cefb38ad16594d17975c6c.1692398074.git.jul...@codesourcery.com/ > > I'll take a look. Thanks! -- Maxim Kuvyrkov https://www.linaro.org ___ linaro-toolchain mailing list -- linaro-toolchain@lists.linaro.org To unsubscribe send an email to linaro-toolchain-le...@lists.linaro.org
Re: [Linaro-TCWG-CI] FAIL: 10 regressions after gcc commit: 5 commits in gcc
Hi Julian,
Your patch series causes regressions on aarch64-linux-gnu. Would you please
investigate?
Let me know if you need any assistance in reproducing these.
Thanks!
--
Maxim Kuvyrkov
https://www.linaro.org
> On Aug 19, 2023, at 09:32, ci_not...@linaro.org wrote:
>
> [Linaro-TCWG-CI] FAIL: 10 regressions after gcc commit: 5 commits in gcc
>
> Dear contributor, our automatic CI has detected problems related to your
> patch.
> Please find below some details about it.
>
> In CI config tcwg_gcc_check/master-aarch64 after:
>
> | gcc commits:
> | dce6c135fb52fd631c2fc82d8048d32ce41ece21 OpenMP/OpenACC: Reorganise OMP
> map clause handling in gimplify.cc
> | dd49dd178e3eac8e9925baa3d71325d8d5f69215 OpenMP/OpenACC:
> Unordered/non-constant component offset runtime diagnostic
> | bd5a53e6b47907d05672cbb603af363a665b45a4 OpenMP: Pointers and member
> mappings
> | 4e0359d8a659c8abdca3297fc9b0e20ff89f7f82 OpenMP/OpenACC: Rework clause
> expansion and nested struct handling
> | a855174e5461d2b423af7f892fd31dfb10ce09ec OpenMP/OpenACC: Reindent
> TO/FROM/_CACHE_ stanza in {c_}finish_omp_clause
>
> FAIL: 10 regressions
>
> regressions.sum:
> === libgomp tests ===
>
> Running libgomp:libgomp.c++/c++.exp ...
> FAIL: libgomp.c++/../libgomp.c-c++-common/map-arrayofstruct-2.c output
> pattern test
> FAIL: libgomp.c++/../libgomp.c-c++-common/map-arrayofstruct-3.c output
> pattern test
>
> Running libgomp:libgomp.c/c.exp ...
> FAIL: libgomp.c/../libgomp.c-c++-common/map-arrayofstruct-2.c output pattern
> test
> FAIL: libgomp.c/../libgomp.c-c++-common/map-arrayofstruct-3.c output pattern
> test
>
> ... and 9 more entries
>
>
>
> -8<--8<--8<--
> The information below can be used to reproduce a debug environment:
>
> Current build :
> https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gcc_check--master-aarch64-precommit/1593/artifact/artifacts
> Reference build :
> https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gcc_check--master-aarch64-build/836/artifact/artifacts
___
linaro-toolchain mailing list -- linaro-toolchain@lists.linaro.org
To unsubscribe send an email to linaro-toolchain-le...@lists.linaro.org
