Re: [Linaro-TCWG-CI] glibc patch #75959: FAIL: 1 regressions
On Sep 15 2023, Maxim Kuvyrkov wrote: > For background, both aarch64 and aarch32 testing is done in docker containers > with very similar-looking rootfs images constructed from the same Dockerfile > template [3]. Therefore, it's unlikely that we forgot to include a tool or > binary in the aarch32 image. But it could be of the wrong architecture. -- Andreas Schwab, sch...@linux-m68k.org GPG Key fingerprint = 7578 EB47 D4E5 4D69 2510 2552 DF73 E780 A9DA AEC1 "And now for something completely different." ___ linaro-toolchain mailing list -- linaro-toolchain@lists.linaro.org To unsubscribe send an email to linaro-toolchain-le...@lists.linaro.org
Re: [Linaro-TCWG-CI] glibc patch #75959: FAIL: 1 regressions
On Sep 14 2023, Siddhesh Poyarekar wrote: > I'm looking at the logs and all it has is: > > original exit status 127 > running post-clean rsync > > for the new test. 127 is command not found in the shell. -- Andreas Schwab, sch...@linux-m68k.org GPG Key fingerprint = 7578 EB47 D4E5 4D69 2510 2552 DF73 E780 A9DA AEC1 "And now for something completely different." ___ linaro-toolchain mailing list -- linaro-toolchain@lists.linaro.org To unsubscribe send an email to linaro-toolchain-le...@lists.linaro.org
Re: [Linaro-TCWG-CI] glibc patch #75959: FAIL: 1 regressions
On 2023-09-14 16:32, ci_not...@linaro.org wrote: Dear contributor, our automatic CI has detected problems related to your patch(es). Please find some details below. If you have any questions, please follow up on linaro-toolchain@lists.linaro.org mailing list, Libera's #linaro-tcwg channel, or ping your favourite Linaro toolchain developer on the usual project channel. In CI config tcwg_glibc_check/master-arm after: | glibc patch https://patchwork.sourceware.org/patch/75959 | Author: Siddhesh Poyarekar | Date: Thu Sep 14 06:13:02 2023 -0400 | | getaddrinfo: Fix use after free in getcanonname (CVE-2023-4806) | | When an NSS plugin only implements the _gethostbyname2_r and | _getcanonname_r callbacks, getaddrinfo could use memory that was freed | during tmpbuf resizing, through h_name in a previous query response. | Fix this by copying h_name over and freeing it at the end. | | ... 3 lines of the commit log omitted. | ... applied on top of baseline commit: | 803f4073cc Add MOVE_MOUNT_BENEATH from Linux 6.5 to sys/mount.h FAIL: 1 regressions regressions.sum: === glibc tests === Running glibc:nss ... FAIL: nss/tst-nss-gai-hv2-canonname === Results Summary === You can find the failure logs in *.log.1.xz files in - https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_glibc_check--master-arm-precommit/703/artifact/artifacts/artifacts.precommit/00-sumfiles/ . The full lists of regressions and progressions are in - https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_glibc_check--master-arm-precommit/703/artifact/artifacts/artifacts.precommit/notify/ . The list of [ignored] baseline and flaky failures are in - https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_glibc_check--master-arm-precommit/703/artifact/artifacts/artifacts.precommit/sumfiles/xfails.xfail . -8<--8<--8<-- The information below can be used to reproduce a debug environment: Current build : https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_glibc_check--master-arm-precommit/703/artifact/artifacts Reference build : https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_glibc_check--master-arm-build/612/artifact/artifacts Hello, I'm looking at the logs and all it has is: original exit status 127 running post-clean rsync for the new test. It looks like other NSS tests also fail in the same way. Is this a known issue on arm? Thanks, Sid ___ linaro-toolchain mailing list -- linaro-toolchain@lists.linaro.org To unsubscribe send an email to linaro-toolchain-le...@lists.linaro.org
Re: [Linaro-TCWG-CI] glibc patch #75959: FAIL: 1 regressions
On 9/14/23 17:04, Siddhesh Poyarekar wrote: > > > On 2023-09-14 16:32, ci_not...@linaro.org wrote: >> Dear contributor, our automatic CI has detected problems related to your >> patch(es). Please find some details below. If you have any questions, >> please follow up on linaro-toolchain@lists.linaro.org mailing list, Libera's >> #linaro-tcwg channel, or ping your favourite Linaro toolchain developer on >> the usual project channel. >> >> In CI config tcwg_glibc_check/master-arm after: >> >> | glibc patch https://patchwork.sourceware.org/patch/75959 >> | Author: Siddhesh Poyarekar >> | Date: Thu Sep 14 06:13:02 2023 -0400 >> | >> | getaddrinfo: Fix use after free in getcanonname (CVE-2023-4806) >> | >> | When an NSS plugin only implements the _gethostbyname2_r and >> | _getcanonname_r callbacks, getaddrinfo could use memory that was >> freed >> | during tmpbuf resizing, through h_name in a previous query response. >> | Fix this by copying h_name over and freeing it at the end. >> | >> | ... 3 lines of the commit log omitted. >> | ... applied on top of baseline commit: >> | 803f4073cc Add MOVE_MOUNT_BENEATH from Linux 6.5 to sys/mount.h >> >> FAIL: 1 regressions >> >> regressions.sum: >> === glibc tests === >> >> Running glibc:nss ... >> FAIL: nss/tst-nss-gai-hv2-canonname >> >> === Results Summary === >> >> You can find the failure logs in *.log.1.xz files in >> - >> https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_glibc_check--master-arm-precommit/703/artifact/artifacts/artifacts.precommit/00-sumfiles/ >> . >> The full lists of regressions and progressions are in >> - >> https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_glibc_check--master-arm-precommit/703/artifact/artifacts/artifacts.precommit/notify/ >> . >> The list of [ignored] baseline and flaky failures are in >> - >> https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_glibc_check--master-arm-precommit/703/artifact/artifacts/artifacts.precommit/sumfiles/xfails.xfail >> . >> >> >> >> -8<--8<--8<-- >> The information below can be used to reproduce a debug environment: >> >> Current build : >> https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_glibc_check--master-arm-precommit/703/artifact/artifacts >> Reference build : >> https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_glibc_check--master-arm-build/612/artifact/artifacts > > Hello, > > I'm looking at the logs and all it has is: > > original exit status 127 > running post-clean rsync > > for the new test. It looks like other NSS tests also fail in the same way. > Is this a known issue on arm? I saw this too when I was doing the review for the patch. And what I noticed was this: Running glibc:nss ... FAIL: nss/tst-nss-compat1 FAIL: nss/tst-nss-db-endgrent FAIL: nss/tst-nss-db-endpwent FAIL: nss/tst-nss-files-hosts-getent FAIL: nss/tst-nss-files-hosts-long FAIL: nss/tst-nss-files-hosts-v4mapped FAIL: nss/tst-nss-gai-actions FAIL: nss/tst-nss-test3 FAIL: nss/tst-reload1 FAIL: nss/tst-reload2 Which means... 75 tests-container := \ 76 tst-nss-compat1 \ 77 tst-nss-db-endgrent \ 78 tst-nss-db-endpwent \ 79 tst-nss-files-hosts-long \ 80 tst-nss-files-hosts-v4mapped \ 81 tst-nss-gai-actions \ 82 tst-nss-test3 \ 83 tst-reload1 \ 84 tst-reload2 \ 85 # tests-container ... all the container tests fail. Note that tst-nss-files-hosts-getent is *not* a container test, but it does use support_become_root() and xchroot() which means it is one of the containerized tests using variant test infrastructure. So this looked like either an infrastructure issue or permission issues with running those tests. I did my own testing on x86_64 and i686 and it was clean. -- Cheers, Carlos. ___ linaro-toolchain mailing list -- linaro-toolchain@lists.linaro.org To unsubscribe send an email to linaro-toolchain-le...@lists.linaro.org
Re: [Linaro-TCWG-CI] glibc patch #75959: FAIL: 1 regressions
Hi All, As Siddhesh has pointed out, 32-bit ARM has other similar nss/* tests failing with "original exit status 127". We do not have these failures for 64-bit AArch64. There seems to be a problem unrelated to Siddhesh's patch. Adhemerval, would you please investigate what's causing it? I see plenty of fails in AArch32 results that do not appear in AArch64 results. See the non-flaky entries at the bottom of [1] and [2]. For background, both aarch64 and aarch32 testing is done in docker containers with very similar-looking rootfs images constructed from the same Dockerfile template [3]. Therefore, it's unlikely that we forgot to include a tool or binary in the aarch32 image. [1] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_glibc_check--master-arm-build/lastStableBuild/artifact/artifacts/sumfiles/xfails.xfail/*view*/ [2] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_glibc_check--master-aarch64-build/lastStableBuild/artifact/artifacts/sumfiles/xfails.xfail/*view*/ [3] https://git.linaro.org/ci/dockerfiles.git/tree/tcwg-base/Dockerfile.in -- Maxim Kuvyrkov https://www.linaro.org > On Sep 15, 2023, at 10:16, Andreas Schwab wrote: > > On Sep 14 2023, Siddhesh Poyarekar wrote: > >> I'm looking at the logs and all it has is: >> >> original exit status 127 >> running post-clean rsync >> >> for the new test. > > 127 is command not found in the shell. > > -- > Andreas Schwab, sch...@linux-m68k.org > GPG Key fingerprint = 7578 EB47 D4E5 4D69 2510 2552 DF73 E780 A9DA AEC1 > "And now for something completely different." ___ linaro-toolchain mailing list -- linaro-toolchain@lists.linaro.org To unsubscribe send an email to linaro-toolchain-le...@lists.linaro.org
