Re: lingo-l xtra problem

2001-08-21 Thread grimmwerks


Huh - well strangely enough it seems that the audio xtra never shows an
instance of itself - even with that weird return, it's there with its'
builtin queries.


[To remove yourself from this list, or to change to digest mode, go to
http://www.penworks.com/LUJ/lingo-l.cgi  To post messages to the list,
email [EMAIL PROTECTED]  (Problems, email [EMAIL PROTECTED])
Lingo-L is for learning and helping with programming Lingo.  Thanks!]




RE: lingo-l xtra problem

2001-08-21 Thread Sean Wilson

 Huh - well strangely enough it seems that the audio xtra never shows an
 instance of itself - even with that weird return, it's there with its'
 builtin queries.

I'm not sure, but I think that you don't have to instantiate the audio xtra
to use it - kind of like BudAPI. The commands are immediately available as
an add-on to the regular features that Lingo provides, without having to
invoke its 'new()' method.

HTH,
-Sean.


[To remove yourself from this list, or to change to digest mode, go to
http://www.penworks.com/LUJ/lingo-l.cgi  To post messages to the list,
email [EMAIL PROTECTED]  (Problems, email [EMAIL PROTECTED])
Lingo-L is for learning and helping with programming Lingo.  Thanks!]




RE: lingo-l xtra problem

2001-08-21 Thread Al Hospers

 Huh - well strangely enough it seems that the audio xtra
 never shows an
 instance of itself - even with that weird return, it's there with
its'
 builtin queries.

like many Xtras these days, you don't have to specifically instantiate
the Audio Xtra.

Al Hospers
CamberSoft, Inc.
alatcambersoftdotcom
http://www.cambersoft.com

Shockwave and Director development, Lingo programming, CGI scripting.

A famous linguist once said:
There is no language wherein a double
positive can form a negative.

YEAH, RIGHT



[To remove yourself from this list, or to change to digest mode, go to
http://www.penworks.com/LUJ/lingo-l.cgi  To post messages to the list,
email [EMAIL PROTECTED]  (Problems, email [EMAIL PROTECTED])
Lingo-L is for learning and helping with programming Lingo.  Thanks!]




RE: lingo-l xtra problem

2001-08-21 Thread grimmwerks


Well, you still have to invoke budapi as well...

On Tue, 21 Aug 2001, Sean Wilson wrote:

  Huh - well strangely enough it seems that the audio xtra never shows an
  instance of itself - even with that weird return, it's there with its'
  builtin queries.
 
 I'm not sure, but I think that you don't have to instantiate the audio xtra
 to use it - kind of like BudAPI. The commands are immediately available as
 an add-on to the regular features that Lingo provides, without having to
 invoke its 'new()' method.
 
 HTH,
 -Sean.
 
 
 [To remove yourself from this list, or to change to digest mode, go to
 http://www.penworks.com/LUJ/lingo-l.cgi  To post messages to the list,
 email [EMAIL PROTECTED]  (Problems, email [EMAIL PROTECTED])
 Lingo-L is for learning and helping with programming Lingo.  Thanks!]
 


[To remove yourself from this list, or to change to digest mode, go to
http://www.penworks.com/LUJ/lingo-l.cgi  To post messages to the list,
email [EMAIL PROTECTED]  (Problems, email [EMAIL PROTECTED])
Lingo-L is for learning and helping with programming Lingo.  Thanks!]




RE: lingo-l xtra problem

2001-08-21 Thread grimmwerks


Huh - is that true? I'm no dope, but I didn't think I could use the Audio
Xtras 'ax' stuff without first creating an object of it? Hmm..

On Tue, 21 Aug 2001, Al Hospers wrote:

 
 like many Xtras these days, you don't have to specifically instantiate
 the Audio Xtra.
 


[To remove yourself from this list, or to change to digest mode, go to
http://www.penworks.com/LUJ/lingo-l.cgi  To post messages to the list,
email [EMAIL PROTECTED]  (Problems, email [EMAIL PROTECTED])
Lingo-L is for learning and helping with programming Lingo.  Thanks!]




RE: lingo-l xtra problem

2001-08-21 Thread Al Hospers

 Huh - is that true? I'm no dope, but I didn't think I could
 use the Audio
 Xtras 'ax' stuff without first creating an object of it? Hmm..

the old XObjects required you to do that  a few Xtras still do, but
to my knowledge most do not. you just call the method. I think the
ones that do so are done so you can have multiple instances floating
around. if I remember correctly the DirectEmail Xtra does this.

I'm sure somebody will correct me if I am wrong tho... grin

Al Hospers
CamberSoft, Inc.
alatcambersoftdotcom
http://www.cambersoft.com

Shockwave and Director development, Lingo programming, CGI scripting.

A famous linguist once said:
There is no language wherein a double
positive can form a negative.

YEAH, RIGHT



[To remove yourself from this list, or to change to digest mode, go to
http://www.penworks.com/LUJ/lingo-l.cgi  To post messages to the list,
email [EMAIL PROTECTED]  (Problems, email [EMAIL PROTECTED])
Lingo-L is for learning and helping with programming Lingo.  Thanks!]




Re: lingo-l xtra problem

2001-08-21 Thread Nick Youmans

 if I remember correctly the DirectEmail Xtra does this.
 I'm sure somebody will correct me if I am wrong tho... grin

it sure does. DirectEmail needs to have an object declared 1st:

oEmail = new(Xtra DirectEmail, getUserEmailPref(2),,) 

then you can do cool things, like actually sending mail:

sendEmail(oEmail, From, sendTo, sendCC,sendBC,subject,body,attach)

it is all very exciting ;-)

Nick Youmans
FutureMedia


[To remove yourself from this list, or to change to digest mode, go to
http://www.penworks.com/LUJ/lingo-l.cgi  To post messages to the list,
email [EMAIL PROTECTED]  (Problems, email [EMAIL PROTECTED])
Lingo-L is for learning and helping with programming Lingo.  Thanks!]




Re: lingo-l xtra problem

2001-08-21 Thread grimmwerks


Does the emailXtra handle attachments at all? 

What's everybody's choice for ftp/uploading/xtranetting files?


[To remove yourself from this list, or to change to digest mode, go to
http://www.penworks.com/LUJ/lingo-l.cgi  To post messages to the list,
email [EMAIL PROTECTED]  (Problems, email [EMAIL PROTECTED])
Lingo-L is for learning and helping with programming Lingo.  Thanks!]




RE: lingo-l xtra problem

2001-08-21 Thread Mark A. Boyd

At 07:43 21/08/2001, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

Well, you still have to invoke budapi as well...

Not so. Buddy API's methods are available to Lingo simply by including the 
Xtra with the project.


--
Mark A. Boyd
Keep-On-Learnin' :)


[To remove yourself from this list, or to change to digest mode, go to
http://www.penworks.com/LUJ/lingo-l.cgi  To post messages to the list,
email [EMAIL PROTECTED]  (Problems, email [EMAIL PROTECTED])
Lingo-L is for learning and helping with programming Lingo.  Thanks!]




RE: lingo-l xtra problem

2001-08-21 Thread Al Hospers

 Does the emailXtra handle attachments at all?

yes

 What's everybody's choice for ftp/uploading/xtranetting files?

other than DirectFTP what else is there? supported that is!

Al Hospers
CamberSoft, Inc.
alatcambersoftdotcom
http://www.cambersoft.com

Shockwave and Director development, Lingo programming, CGI scripting.

A famous linguist once said:
There is no language wherein a double
positive can form a negative.

YEAH, RIGHT



[To remove yourself from this list, or to change to digest mode, go to
http://www.penworks.com/LUJ/lingo-l.cgi  To post messages to the list,
email [EMAIL PROTECTED]  (Problems, email [EMAIL PROTECTED])
Lingo-L is for learning and helping with programming Lingo.  Thanks!]




Re: RE: lingo-l xtra problem

2001-08-21 Thread Kurt

 Well, you still have to invoke budapi as well...

Instantiate? No, you don't - you can do it, but it's a waste of time.

Because buddy's functions are global, the ba prefix is there to help
differentiate the xtra's functions from lingo functions. Same goes for the
audio xtra v. 4 (which is a significant change from version 3).

-Kurt


[To remove yourself from this list, or to change to digest mode, go to
http://www.penworks.com/LUJ/lingo-l.cgi  To post messages to the list,
email [EMAIL PROTECTED]  (Problems, email [EMAIL PROTECTED])
Lingo-L is for learning and helping with programming Lingo.  Thanks!]