[LINK] From secrecy to dignity: trust and policy implications of shifting attitudes to privacy

2019-01-27 Thread Kim Holburn
https://nsc.crawford.anu.edu.au/department-news/13675/secrecy-dignity-trust-and-policy-implications-shifting-attitudes-privacy


-- 
Kim Holburn
IT Network & Security Consultant
T: +61 2 61402408  M: +61 404072753
mailto:k...@holburn.net  aim://kimholburn
skype://kholburn - PGP Public Key on request 




___
Link mailing list
Link@mailman.anu.edu.au
http://mailman.anu.edu.au/mailman/listinfo/link


[LINK] MHR - letter to local paper

2019-01-27 Thread Karl Auer
For what it's worth, I just sent this to my local paper for publication
(I hope) on Wednesday 30/1/2019.

Regards, K

~

Get out while you still can

The last possible day to opt-out of the My Health Record system is
Thursday this week (31/1/2019). After that, you will get a record
whether you want one or not.

If you have a My Health Record, the information in it will be available
to any Government agency that wants it, for any reason at all. That
includes the ATO, Centrelink and law enforcement. The legislation also
makes clear that your medical information can be provided to commercial
third parties.

You have almost no ability to control who sees what. You cannot control
what is recorded. With minor exceptions you cannot change or remove
what has been recorded, even if it was uploaded without your consent.

Once you have a My Health Record, you cannot delete it, only "cancel"
it. A cancelled record remains available to the Government. The
Government says it will delete your record on request, but the sad fact
is that they will probably not be able to.

This is not a party-political matter. Both sides of politics seem
perfectly happy to put your sensitive medical information on the
internet. The security is a nonsense; with hundreds of thousands of
people authorised to look at it, anyone who wants it will be able to
get it.

Get out while you still can. Search for "opt-out-my-health-record". If
you discover (as thousands have) that a My Health Record has already
been created for you without your knowledge or consent, cancel it. If
you have children, opt them out too.

-- 
~~~
Karl Auer (ka...@biplane.com.au)
http://www.biplane.com.au/kauer
http://twitter.com/kauer389

GPG fingerprint: A0CD 28F0 10BE FC21 C57C 67C1 19A6 83A4 9B0B 1D75
Old fingerprint: A52E F6B9 708B 51C4 85E6 1634 0571 ADF9 3C1C 6A3A


___
Link mailing list
Link@mailman.anu.edu.au
http://mailman.anu.edu.au/mailman/listinfo/link


Re: [LINK] MHR - letter to local paper

2019-01-27 Thread David
On Monday, 28 January 2019 10:45:51 AEDT Karl Auer wrote:

> If you have a My Health Record, the information in it will be available to 
> any Government agency that wants it, for any reason at all. That includes the 
> ATO, Centrelink and law enforcement. The legislation also makes clear that 
> your medical information can be provided to commercial third parties.

I mentioned that to my very competent and well-informed GP, although not the 
bit about third-parties, however she claimed it was not true.  Where is the 
most authoritative source reference?

David L.

___
Link mailing list
Link@mailman.anu.edu.au
http://mailman.anu.edu.au/mailman/listinfo/link


Re: [LINK] MHR - letter to local paper

2019-01-27 Thread JLWhitaker

On 28/01/2019 10:45 AM, Karl Auer wrote:

For what it's worth, I just sent this to my local paper for publication
(I hope) on Wednesday 30/1/2019.


They claim the laws were passed in November. It's even on their website!! ;)

https://twitter.com/MyHealthRec/status/1089699572392386561


https://twitter.com/MyHealthRec/status/1089699572392386561https://twitter.com/MyHealthRec/status/1089699572392386561
https://twitter.com/MyHealthRec/status/108969957239238

--
Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
jw...@janwhitaker.com
Twitter: @JL_Whitaker
Blog: www.janwhitaker.com

Sooner or later, I hate to break it to you, you're gonna die, so how do you 
fill in the space between here and there? It's yours. Seize your space.
~Margaret Atwood, writer

_ __ _

___
Link mailing list
Link@mailman.anu.edu.au
http://mailman.anu.edu.au/mailman/listinfo/link


Re: [LINK] MHR - letter to local paper

2019-01-27 Thread David
On Monday, 28 January 2019 10:45:51 AEDT Karl Auer wrote:

> If you have a My Health Record, the information in it will be available to 
> any Government agency that wants it, for any reason at all. That includes the 
> ATO, Centrelink and law enforcement. The legislation also makes clear that 
> your medical information can be provided to commercial third parties.

I'm not convinced the following can be taken at face value but, for what it's 
worth, the agency claims the legislation "My Health Records Amendment 
(Strengthening Privacy) Bill 2018" ensures:
- see 
https://www.myhealthrecord.gov.au/for-you-your-family/howtos/frequently-asked-questions
 -

QUOTES
o   Which doctors and other healthcare providers can look at my health 
information?
Only healthcare provider organisations involved in your care, who are 
registered with the My Health Record System Operator, are allowed by law to 
access your My Health Record.  This may include GPs, pharmacies, pathology 
labs, hospitals, specialists and allied health professionals.

o   Can the police, Centrelink and ATO access my record?
Under new Health Record privacy laws, no information can be released to law 
enforcement or a government agency without your consent or an order from a 
judicial officer.

o   Can an insurance company or my employer access my record?
Under new laws, no-one is permitted to access, or ask you to disclose, any 
information within your My Health Record for insurance or employment purposes.

o   Can My Health Record data be used for commercial purposes?
Under new laws, the My Health Record system cannot be privatised or used for 
commercial purposes.  Only a government organisation will ever be able to 
manage the My Health Record system.
END QUOTES

However I detect the presence of weasel words in the second & fourth items 
quoted.

The second would have little force if some other piece of legislation gives a 
security agency, for example, unfettered access because a "judicial officer" 
would then have no choice.  And in any case, I wonder whether there are any 
limitations on the circumstances when access can be given.

The last point, as explained in that FAQ, doesn't distinguish between the 
system per se and the information it contains and doesn't explain what "manage" 
actually means - can the Health Department outsource the hosting of 
MyHealthRecord?

NSW has an act "Health Records and Information Privacy Act 2002 No 71" intended 
to regulate the whole general area which includes specific exemptions:

QUOTE
This Act does not apply to the Independent Commission Against Corruption, the 
Inspector of the Independent Commission Against Corruption, the staff of the 
Inspector of the Independent Commission Against Corruption, the NSW Police 
Force, the Law Enforcement Conduct Commission, the Inspector of the Law 
Enforcement Conduct Commission, the staff of the Inspector of the Law 
Enforcement Conduct Commission and the New South Wales Crime Commission, except 
in connection with the exercise of their administrative and educative functions.
UNQUOTE

Call me a cynic, but I'm out of it...

David L.

___
Link mailing list
Link@mailman.anu.edu.au
http://mailman.anu.edu.au/mailman/listinfo/link


[LINK] Data Sovereignty questions

2019-01-27 Thread Bernard Robertson-Dunn
Suppose ADHA, who run My Health Record, wanted to use Akamai CDN
services for all the usual reasons.

Questions.

Would Akamai have to use Australian servers to store the cached, static
data? or could they use overseas servers?

Would Akamai have to use edge servers in Australia? or could they use
USA based edge servers

What is the current status of USA law regarding USA companies having to
hand over foreign data that they (the companies) store to their government?

-- 

Regards
brd

Bernard Robertson-Dunn
Canberra Australia
email: b...@iimetro.com.au
web:   www.drbrd.com
web:   www.problemsfirst.com

___
Link mailing list
Link@mailman.anu.edu.au
http://mailman.anu.edu.au/mailman/listinfo/link


Re: [LINK] Data Sovereignty questions

2019-01-27 Thread Roger Clarke

On 28/1/19 14:52, Bernard Robertson-Dunn wrote:

Suppose ADHA, who run My Health Record, wanted to use Akamai CDN
services for all the usual reasons.

Questions.

Would Akamai have to use Australian servers to store the cached, static
data? or could they use overseas servers?

Would Akamai have to use edge servers in Australia? or could they use
USA based edge servers


No specific answers, sorry;  but here's the publicly-provided 
information-base that enables answers to be developed:


1.  The Objects of the Privacy Act include:
http://www8.austlii.edu.au/au/legis/cth/consol_act/pa1988108/s2a.html
>(f) to facilitate the free flow of information across national 
borders  while ensuring that the privacy of individuals is respected; and


The primacy of economics, and the secondary, mere constraint of a bit of 
respect for privacy, are cemented in, as with all OECD-derived d.p. laws.


Put another way, if an agency found it cheaper to export the data, the 
onus would be on proponents of national sovereignty to argue the case 
for it *not* to be exported.


And of course, even if such a discussion were ever held, there's no 
representation of the public interest in the room.  (The OAIC doesn't 
have any right to be in the room, and is in any case an administering 
and facilitating agency, not a protector of the public interest).


2.  APP8
https://www.oaic.gov.au/individuals/privacy-fact-sheets/general/privacy-fact-sheet-17-australian-privacy-principles#australian-privacy-principle-8-cross-border-disclosure-of-personal-information

"take such steps as are reasonable in the circumstances"

"does not apply ... if [long list of loose and open-ended circumstances]"

A trainee lawyer could drive a bus through it.


3.  OAIC Guidelines on APP8
https://www.oaic.gov.au/agencies-and-organisations/app-guidelines/chapter-8-app-8-cross-border-disclosure-of-personal-information

Expensive lawyers paid for out of the OAIC budget wrote over 6,000 words 
to assist aforesaid trainee lawyers to find said gaps of bus-width.



My short answer is that I reckon any agency can do absolutely anything 
it likes, without any risk even of it being in breach, let alone of any 
sanctions applying or retribution being taken.  (IANAL, and I haven't 
wasted the time doing enough hard yards to remove "I reckon").



> What is the current status of USA law regarding USA companies having 
to hand over foreign data that they (the companies) store to their 
government?


AFAIK, few effective constraints apply to the assertions (under several 
laws) of US extra-territorial powers, which mean that the data doesn't 
even have to be in the US, merely in the possession of a US corporation.



--
Roger Clarkemailto:roger.cla...@xamax.com.au
T: +61 2 6288 6916   http://www.xamax.com.au  http://www.rogerclarke.com

Xamax Consultancy Pty Ltd  78 Sidaway St, Chapman ACT 2611 AUSTRALIA 


Visiting Professor in the Faculty of LawUniversity of N.S.W.
Visiting Professor in Computer ScienceAustralian National University
___
Link mailing list
Link@mailman.anu.edu.au
http://mailman.anu.edu.au/mailman/listinfo/link


Re: [LINK] MHR - letter to local paper

2019-01-27 Thread Bernard Robertson-Dunn
One thing they (ADHA) never talks about is the section in the
legislation that effectively cripples the whole privacy protection stuff:

TL;DR If the data can be got elsewhere, all bets are off. FYI, the
system is designed to get copies of data held elsewhere.

This is exactly what the legislation says:

Division 3—Prohibitions and authorisations limited to My Health Record
system

71  Prohibitions and authorisations limited to health information
collected by using the My Health Record system

(1) The prohibitions and authorisations under Divisions 1 and 2 in
respect of the collection, use and disclosure of health information
included in a healthcare recipient’s My Health Record are limited to the
collection, use or disclosure of health information obtained by using
the My Health Record system.

(2) If health information included in a healthcare recipient’s My Health
Record can also be obtained by means other than by using the My Health
Record system, such a prohibition or authorisation does not apply to
health information lawfully obtained by those other means, even if the
health information was originally obtained by using the My Health Record
system.

Information stored for more than one purpose

(3) Without limiting the circumstances in which health information
included in a healthcare recipient’s My Health Record and obtained by a
person is taken not to be obtained by using or gaining access to the My
Health Record system, it is taken not to be so obtained if:

  (a) the health information is stored in a repository operated both for
the purposes of the My Health Record system and other purposes; and

  (b) the person lawfully obtained the health information directly from
the repository for those other purposes.

Note:    For example, information that is included in a registered
healthcare recipient’s My Health Record may be stored in a repository
operated by a State or Territory for purposes related to the My Health
Record system and other purposes. When lawfully obtained directly from
the repository for those other purposes, the prohibitions and
authorisations in this Part will not apply.

Information originally obtained by means of My Health Record system

(4) Without limiting the circumstances in which health information
included in a healthcare recipient’s My Health Record and obtained by a
person is taken not to be obtained by using or gaining access to the My
Health Record system, it is taken not to be so obtained if:

 (a)  the health information was originally obtained by a participant in
the My Health Record system by means of the My Health Record system in
accordance with this Act; and

 (b)  after the health information was so obtained, it was stored in
such a way that it could be obtained other than by means of the My
Health Record system; and

 (c)  the person subsequently obtained the health information by those
other means.

Note:    For example, information that is included in a registered
healthcare recipient’s My Health Record may be downloaded into the
clinical health records of a healthcare provider and later obtained from
those records.


On 28/01/2019 2:20 pm, David wrote:
> On Monday, 28 January 2019 10:45:51 AEDT Karl Auer wrote:
>
>> If you have a My Health Record, the information in it will be available to 
>> any Government agency that wants it, for any reason at all. That includes 
>> the ATO, Centrelink and law enforcement. The legislation also makes clear 
>> that your medical information can be provided to commercial third parties.
> I'm not convinced the following can be taken at face value but, for what it's 
> worth, the agency claims the legislation "My Health Records Amendment 
> (Strengthening Privacy) Bill 2018" ensures:
> - see 
> https://www.myhealthrecord.gov.au/for-you-your-family/howtos/frequently-asked-questions
>  -
>
> QUOTES
> o   Which doctors and other healthcare providers can look at my health 
> information?
> Only healthcare provider organisations involved in your care, who are 
> registered with the My Health Record System Operator, are allowed by law to 
> access your My Health Record.  This may include GPs, pharmacies, pathology 
> labs, hospitals, specialists and allied health professionals.
>
> o   Can the police, Centrelink and ATO access my record?
> Under new Health Record privacy laws, no information can be released to law 
> enforcement or a government agency without your consent or an order from a 
> judicial officer.
>
> o   Can an insurance company or my employer access my record?
> Under new laws, no-one is permitted to access, or ask you to disclose, any 
> information within your My Health Record for insurance or employment purposes.
>
> o   Can My Health Record data be used for commercial purposes?
> Under new laws, the My Health Record system cannot be privatised or used for 
> commercial purposes.  Only a government organisation will ever be able to 
> manage the My Health Record system.
> END QUOTES
>
> However I detect the presen

Re: [LINK] MHR - letter to local paper

2019-01-27 Thread JLWhitaker

On 28/01/2019 10:45 AM, Karl Auer wrote:

Once you have a My Health Record, you cannot delete it, only "cancel"
it. A cancelled record remains available to the Government. The
Government says it will delete your record on request, but the sad fact
is that they will probably not be able to.


I got push back from MyHealth Record on twitter again re deletion, 
saying they implemented the delete function on 24 January.


https://twitter.com/MyHealthRec/status/1089734951757664258

"Hi there, yes the ability to permanently delete a My Health Record, 
including any backups, was made available on 24 January 2019. For more 
details, see:"

(their website)

Next?
Jan

--
Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
jw...@janwhitaker.com
Twitter: @JL_Whitaker
Blog: www.janwhitaker.com

Sooner or later, I hate to break it to you, you're gonna die, so how do you 
fill in the space between here and there? It's yours. Seize your space.
~Margaret Atwood, writer

_ __ _

___
Link mailing list
Link@mailman.anu.edu.au
http://mailman.anu.edu.au/mailman/listinfo/link


Re: [LINK] MHR - letter to local paper

2019-01-27 Thread David
On Monday, 28 January 2019 15:37:55 AEDT Bernard Robertson-Dunn wrote:
> If the data can be got elsewhere, all bets are off. FYI, the system is 
> designed to get copies of data held elsewhere.

That certainly seems to be the case.  The Amendments are enacted separately, 
and the legislation would be easier to understand if "My Health Records Act 
2012" (the Act) were updated so everything could be read in context.

The Amendments appear to insert a new Sc. 69A into the Act "Disclosure to 
designated entity under order by judicial officer" which begins:
---
(1)  If an entity that is:
  (a)  an agency, or a State or Territory authority, within the meaning of 
the Privacy Act 1988; and
  (b)  not a court, tribunal or coroner;
(a designated entity) presents to the System Operator an order made under this 
section, the System Operator must comply with the order.
---

Presumably that means the state police forces are designated entities.  But as 
Bernard points out, once the data is on their system the MyHealthRecord 
restrictions no longer apply.  Furthermore, the NSW "Health Records and 
Information Privacy Act 2002 No 71" exempts the NSW Police so they're 
conveniently free to acquire MyHealthRecord data, and I'm sure they'd be happy 
to pass it on to any Commonwealth agency.

David L.

___
Link mailing list
Link@mailman.anu.edu.au
http://mailman.anu.edu.au/mailman/listinfo/link