Security Publications

2004-05-03 Thread Ferguson, Neale
7 new or updated documents on Linux security can be found at:
http://www-124.ibm.com/linux/pubs/?topic_id=5

Linux security solutions for businesses on IBM eServer xSeries (Apr
2004)
Published May 2003.
 
The State of Linux Security (Apr 2004)
Written by Doc Shankar. Presented at LinxuWorld Conference and Expo
in the Fall of 2003. Updated in April 2004.
 
Linux on zSeries Security White Paper (Apr 2004)
Written by Ingolf Salm and Peter Spera. Published March 2004.
 
Choosing Secure Platforms in the Enterprise (Apr 2004)
Comparing Linux and Windows security head-to-head. Written by the
Robert Francis Group, Inc.
 
Certifying Open Source -­ The Linux Experience (Apr 2004)
Presented at a IEEE conference in 2003.
 
SELinux Thoughts/Direction (Apr 2004)
Presented by Doc Shankar and Trent Jaeger at LinuxWorld Conference
and Expo 2004 New York in January 2004.
 
Evaluating and Certifying Open Source -­ The Linux Experience (Apr
2004)
Presented by Doc Shankar (IBM) and Helmut Kurth (atsec information
security GmbH) at the ICCC 2003 conference.

--
For LINUX-390 subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: INFO LINUX-390 or visit
http://www.marist.edu/htbin/wlvindex?LINUX-390


Re: Migrating Linux LPAR to another processor

2004-05-03 Thread Post, Mark K
Which was all I was saying.  I was just responding to the "you might want to
do this" aspect.  It is entirely optional whether you do it _before_ the
move or not.  Afterwards, it is mandatory, or your system won't be of much
use to you.


Mark Post

-Original Message-
From: Linux on 390 Port [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Adam
Thornton
Sent: Monday, May 03, 2004 12:49 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Migrating Linux LPAR to another processor


On Mon, 2004-05-03 at 11:33, Post, Mark K wrote:
> Perhaps, but it's a definite "must do" _after_ the move has been
> completed. YaST would be the appropriate method to do this.  Also, the
> default gateway may need to be changed.  Again, YaST would be the tool
> to use.

If you're going to use YaST, then you need the ifconfig steps first anyway.
If you're happy editing the system config files that YaST reads, you could
skip that and just edit them directly.  But basically, I too am of the
opinion that that's way too much hassle.  Get the interface up via the HMC,
then ssh into the box and run YaST to make your changes permanent.

Adam

--
For LINUX-390 subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email
to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: INFO LINUX-390 or visit
http://www.marist.edu/htbin/wlvindex?LINUX-390

--
For LINUX-390 subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: INFO LINUX-390 or visit
http://www.marist.edu/htbin/wlvindex?LINUX-390


Re: Migrating Linux LPAR to another processor

2004-05-03 Thread Adam Thornton
On Mon, 2004-05-03 at 11:33, Post, Mark K wrote:
> Perhaps, but it's a definite "must do" _after_ the move has been completed.
> YaST would be the appropriate method to do this.  Also, the default gateway
> may need to be changed.  Again, YaST would be the tool to use.

If you're going to use YaST, then you need the ifconfig steps first
anyway.  If you're happy editing the system config files that YaST
reads, you could skip that and just edit them directly.  But basically,
I too am of the opinion that that's way too much hassle.  Get the
interface up via the HMC, then ssh into the box and run YaST to make
your changes permanent.

Adam

--
For LINUX-390 subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: INFO LINUX-390 or visit
http://www.marist.edu/htbin/wlvindex?LINUX-390


Re: Migrating Linux LPAR to another processor

2004-05-03 Thread Post, Mark K
Perhaps, but it's a definite "must do" _after_ the move has been completed.
YaST would be the appropriate method to do this.  Also, the default gateway
may need to be changed.  Again, YaST would be the tool to use.


Mark Post

-Original Message-
From: Linux on 390 Port [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Adam
Thornton
Sent: Monday, May 03, 2004 10:34 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Migrating Linux LPAR to another processor


-snip-
You might even want to configure your startup scripts to give the interfaces
the correct (new) addresses so you don't have to mess with ifconfig, but
that's likely to be more hassle than it's worth.

Adam

--
For LINUX-390 subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email
to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: INFO LINUX-390 or visit
http://www.marist.edu/htbin/wlvindex?LINUX-390

--
For LINUX-390 subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: INFO LINUX-390 or visit
http://www.marist.edu/htbin/wlvindex?LINUX-390


Linux dump formats

2004-05-03 Thread Phil Smith III
When someone does take a Linux dump, what do they typically use?  Has lkcd
become the de facto standard?  I'm thinking about a VMD2LKCD utility, but
would hate to invest any time in it if that was the wrong direction to be
heading.

--
...phsiii

Phil Smith III
Linuxcare, Inc.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(703) 476-4511 (office)
(703) 568-6662 (cell)

--
For LINUX-390 subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: INFO LINUX-390 or visit
http://www.marist.edu/htbin/wlvindex?LINUX-390


Re: Migrating Linux LPAR to another processor

2004-05-03 Thread Adam Thornton
On Mon, 2004-05-03 at 08:43, Peter E. Abresch Jr. - at Pepco wrote:

> I was thinking of the following steps:

[...]

> 8   Drink some beer

I don't see anything wrong with your plan.  On the other hand, it's
Monday morning so my perception isn't really up to speed yet.

I would, however, suggest replicating part 8, moving it to the top, and
additionally inserting copies between each additional step.

You might even want to configure your startup scripts to give the
interfaces the correct (new) addresses so you don't have to mess with
ifconfig, but that's likely to be more hassle than it's worth.

Adam

--
For LINUX-390 subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: INFO LINUX-390 or visit
http://www.marist.edu/htbin/wlvindex?LINUX-390


Migrating Linux LPAR to another processor

2004-05-03 Thread Peter E. Abresch Jr. - at Pepco
I am running SuSE Linux SLES8 SP03 on a native IBM 9672-R26 LPAR. I must
migrate this Linux LPAR to an IBM 2066-002 LPAR. Both processors are
connected to the same DASD so none of the DASD addresses will change. The
OSAs are physically different but still remain OSA/e 100-megabit Ethernet
connections. They have the same UCBs on both processors but the IP
addresses will be different. The CTCs have the same UCBs and IP addresses
as well as the dummy0 interface. It is only the 2 OSA/e interfaces that
must change. What will be the best method of handling this?

I was thinking of the following steps:

1   Create new zebra and ospfd configuration files with the new IP
addresses for the OSA/e interfaces

2   Disable the automatic startup of zebra and ospfd

3   Shutdown and deactivate the Linux LPAR on the IBM 9672-R26

4   Activate and boot the same Linux system on the IBM 2066-002 LPAR

5   From the HMC console, use the IFCONFIG command to reconfigure the
ip addresses for the 2 OSA/e ethx interfaces

6   Start zebra and ospfd using the new configuration files created in
step 1.

7   Enable the automatic startup of zebra and ospfd

8   Drink some beer

Please provide comments, suggestions, and recommendations. Also, are there
any gotchas that I do not know about. Thanks.

Peter


--
For LINUX-390 subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: INFO LINUX-390 or visit
http://www.marist.edu/htbin/wlvindex?LINUX-390


Re: 2.6 kernel and old DASD problem

2004-05-03 Thread Martin Schwidefsky
> SenseID : device 0750 reports: CU  Type/Mod = 3990/EC, Dev Type/Mod =
> 3390/0A (for Shark)
> SenseID : device 080b reports: CU  Type/Mod = 3990/E9, Dev Type/Mod =
> 3390/0A   (for Tetragon)
> SenseID : device 080c reports: CU  Type/Mod = 3990/E9, Dev Type/Mod =
> 3390/0A   (for Tetragon)

Hmm, the cu type/dev type combination is fine. The must be another reason
why the dasd aren't recognized. If this system runs under z/VM could you
do a "#CP CPU ALL TR IO 080B INST INT CCW RUN" and post the log?

blue skies,
   Martin

Linux/390 Design & Development, IBM Deutschland Entwicklung GmbH
Schönaicherstr. 220, D-71032 Böblingen, Telefon: 49 - (0)7031 - 16-2247
E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

--
For LINUX-390 subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: INFO LINUX-390 or visit
http://www.marist.edu/htbin/wlvindex?LINUX-390


Re: zSeries , Linux and spin loops

2004-05-03 Thread James Tison
Gerard,

In my experience, no. VM makes no difference in the multi-CPU decision.

--Jim--
James S. Tison
Senior Software Engineer
TPF Laboratory / Architecture
IBM Corporation
"If dogs don't go to heaven, then, when I die, I want to go where they
do." -- Will Rogers



"Ceruti, Gerard G" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent by: Linux on 390 Port <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
05/03/2004 05:04
Please respond to
Linux on 390 Port


To
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc

Subject
zSeries , Linux and spin loops






Hi People

Perhaps someone can comment ,(assume for the discussion that the business
application requires only ONE CP)
We are looking at a zSeries Linux production setup and the discussion of
how
many CP are required has come up, normal rules say we should get another
CP
to handle possible spinloops,ensure multi processing, how does this relate
to Linux, does the requirement change if we have z/VM ?.

Thanks
Gerard Ceruti

__


For information about the Standard Bank group visit our web site

__


Disclaimer and confidentiality note
Everything in this e-mail and any attachments relating to the official
business of Standard Bank Group Limited  is proprietary to the group.
It is confidential, legally privileged and protected by law.
Standard Bank does not own and endorse any other content. Views and
opinions are those of the sender unless clearly stated as being that of
the group.
The person addressed in the e-mail is the sole authorised recipient.
Please notify the sender immediately if it has unintentionally reached you
and do not read,
disclose or use the content in any way.
Standard Bank can not assure that the integrity of this communication has
been maintained nor that it is free of errors, virus, interception or
interference.
___


--
For LINUX-390 subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: INFO LINUX-390 or
visit
http://www.marist.edu/htbin/wlvindex?LINUX-390

--
For LINUX-390 subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: INFO LINUX-390 or visit
http://www.marist.edu/htbin/wlvindex?LINUX-390


zSeries , Linux and spin loops

2004-05-03 Thread Ceruti, Gerard G
Hi People

Perhaps someone can comment ,(assume for the discussion that the business
application requires only ONE CP)
We are looking at a zSeries Linux production setup and the discussion of how
many CP are required has come up, normal rules say we should get another CP
to handle possible spinloops,ensure multi processing, how does this relate
to Linux, does the requirement change if we have z/VM ?.

Thanks
Gerard Ceruti

__

For information about the Standard Bank group visit our web site 

__

Disclaimer and confidentiality note
Everything in this e-mail and any attachments relating to the official business of 
Standard Bank Group Limited  is proprietary to the group.
It is confidential, legally privileged and protected by law.
Standard Bank does not own and endorse any other content. Views and opinions are those 
of the sender unless clearly stated as being that of the group.
The person addressed in the e-mail is the sole authorised recipient. Please notify the 
sender immediately if it has unintentionally reached you and do not read,
disclose or use the content in any way.
Standard Bank can not assure that the integrity of this communication has been 
maintained nor that it is free of errors, virus, interception or interference.
___

--
For LINUX-390 subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: INFO LINUX-390 or visit
http://www.marist.edu/htbin/wlvindex?LINUX-390