FW: Good article on how the nether world is attacking Linux
cross-post -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Binyamin Dissen Sent: Friday, May 21, 2004 6:01 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Good article on how the nether world is attacking Linux http://www.cs.vu.nl/~ast/brown/ -- Binyamin Dissen [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.dissensoftware.com Director, Dissen Software, Bar Grill - Israel -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html -- For LINUX-390 subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: INFO LINUX-390 or visit http://www.marist.edu/htbin/wlvindex?LINUX-390
Re: Sysadmin catches 419 scammer
A shame the police were so restrained when subduing him -Original Message- From: Linux on 390 Port [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of John Ford Sent: Tuesday, April 06, 2004 3:40 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: OT: Sysadmin catches 419 scammer A hart-warming story... http://www.linux.ie/pipermail/ilug/2004-April/013049.html -- jcf -- For LINUX-390 subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: INFO LINUX-390 or visit http://www.marist.edu/htbin/wlvindex?LINUX-390 -- For LINUX-390 subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: INFO LINUX-390 or visit http://www.marist.edu/htbin/wlvindex?LINUX-390
Re: Laptop running Linux?
Also look at http://www.linux-laptop.net/ I'm also contemplating getting a Linux laptop...going to develop some free sw as I travel around in my retirement freedom. Bill -Original Message- From: Linux on 390 Port [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of McKown, John Sent: Monday, February 23, 2004 11:51 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: OT: Laptop running Linux? I hope this doesn't upset anybody. But I am considering getting a Laptop. Of course, I am only interested in one running Linux/Intel. But most vendors are suggesting Windows XP. I've only found a couple of Linux laptop vendors (ASA Computers and EmperorLinux). And their prices are in the premium range. It almost looks like it would be less expensive to buy a normal laptop and just install Linux myself. Any suggestions? It might be nice to keep the list clean by replying directly to me at mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Thanks. -- John McKown Senior Systems Programmer UICI Insurance Center Applications Solutions Team This message (including any attachments) contains confidential information intended for a specific individual and purpose, and its' content is protected by law. If you are not the intended recipient, you should delete this message and are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, or distribution of this transmission, or taking any action based on it, is strictly prohibited.
Re: PayPal Scam
This kind of 'phishing' is quite common, and is used with addesses harvested in any way the spammer can get them. I get over 100 spams, including phishes, at an e-mail address I have never ever used in any public context. Citibank, e-bay and PayPal have had to send out announcements to their clients, reminding them that ANY unsolicited mail asking for personal information is evil. Bill -Original Message- From: Linux on 390 Port [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of James Melin Sent: Monday, February 09, 2004 10:06 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: PayPal Scam Well then, is the address being mined from the online archive, or are these addresses being mined from actual e-mails in some poor bastards personal machine? Until I started being active on the rexx forum, mvs-oe forum and this forum I didn't get much spam. Now I get a couple dozen per day. That in an of itself, does not prove anything. I've written to hundreds of people at dozens of vendors for a variety of reasons over the last 10 years. Could have started from any one of them. |-+ | | Phil Payne | | | [EMAIL PROTECTED]| | | arch.com| | | Sent by: Linux on| | | 390 Port | | | [EMAIL PROTECTED]| | | IST.EDU | | || | || | | 02/09/2004 08:52 | | | AM | | | Please respond to| | | Linux on 390 Port| | || |-+ --| | | | To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | | cc: | | Subject: PayPal Scam | --| Yup - I've been around online since 19xx (YERY early contributor to Usenet) and I realise fully that reponding to a mailing list about a virus is of itself contrbuting to the problem. But this one's nasty. The only place the source of this address COULD have been is the Linux mailing list - so it's possibly pervasive here. It's well constructed, too: Headers first: Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Envelope-to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Delivery-date: Mon, 09 Feb 2004 03:32:28 +0100 Received: from [211.230.41.194] (helo=localhost) by mxng08.kundenserver.de with smtp (Exim 3.35 #1) id 1Aq1Ci-r7-00 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mon, 09 Feb 2004 03:31:35 +0100 From: PayPal.com [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Linux [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Priority: 1 (High) Subject: IMPORTANT fvohykwe MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary=--3016BE7E000547C X-RBL-Warning: (dialup.bl.kundenserver.de) This mail has been received from a dialup host. Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Mon, 09 Feb 2004 03:31:35 +0100 A quite well forged envelope. with only my German ISP warning me that it's from a dial-up host. Body next: Dear PayPal member, We regret to inform you that your account is about to be expired in next five business days. To avoid suspension of your account you have to reactivate it by providing us with your personal information. To update your personal profile and continue using PayPal services you have to run the attached application to this email. Just run it and follow the instructions. IMPORTANT! If you ignore this alert, your account will be suspended in next five business days and you will not be able to use PayPal anymore. Thank you for using PayPal. fvofykwy Fails at the first hurdle for me - I'm not and never have been a PayPal member. The attached application (obviously deleted) is a 13KB .PIF file which neither Norton nor AVG picked up on its way through. -- Phil Payne http://www.isham-research.com +44 7785 302 803
Re: SCO sues Novell
Every coffee maker I have ever seen pours water near the boiling point over the grounds. The temperature of the warmers is what affects how hot it is when it is poured into the cup. And I suspect people getting coffee to go find value in hotter initial temperatures, since the coffee will still be hot when they get to wherever they are going to drink it. Bill With the intent of beating the equine directly into the ground, I find that I must add that McDonalds uses excessively high temperatures to brew it's coffee. Higher temperatures = more cups per pound of coffee, so there is a definite financial incentive to raise the water temperature well beyond that of the typical consumer coffee maker. Add this fact to the number of ignored consumer complaints about the aforementioned high temperature and you begin to see a picture of corporate neglect. Almost all coffee drinkers have spilled coffee on themselves at one time or another, but how many of us have sustained third degree burns as a result?
Re: SCO sues Novell
And it's McDonald's fault she's stupid enough to put hot coffee in her crotch... maybe all that junk food lowered her IQ, and she should sue for that too... -Original Message- From: Linux on 390 Port [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Chris Cox Sent: Monday, January 26, 2004 2:30 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: SCO sues Novell Phil Payne wrote: I for one hope they get what they really deserve and it to be a corner movement to nail anyone else that tries this again..and maybe bleed over to other dumb case like suing MacDonald's for hot coffee .. I can't get the following URL not to fold - I'm afraid you'll have to rebuild it. From the Association of Trial Lawyers of America web site: http://www.atlanet.org/ConsumerMediaResources/Tier3/press_room/FACTS/frivolous/McdonaldsCoffee case.aspx ...
Re: SCO sues Novell
I wouldn't give those lawyers any credit for getting MS a free pass. MS lost the case on the facts, and their lawyers let them make fools of themselves - remember the rigged demo, and Gates' statement the he didn't mark a message 'high importance' - the computer did. The decision was overturned on a 'procedural' error because Judge Jackson made public remarks about the case, and the appeal judge wasn't interested in any facts, just in letting MS off the hook. Bill -Original Message- From: Linux on 390 Port [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Chris Cox Sent: Wednesday, January 21, 2004 1:29 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: SCO sues Novell Ryan Ware wrote: .. No, they have some of the best and some of the richest. I too think that SCO may have an ace yet. So... the best lawyers are the ones that let Microsoft get away with a simple hand slap for being a monopoly?? I don't think they have a clue. Just look at the stupid remarks that SCO keeps on making. Any reasonable lawyer would have gagged Darl by now nope... I don't believe any part of that except the richest part.
Re: Gartner on SCO
People pay big bucks to hear Gartner say that SCO has no viable software business, and has gone into the IP litigation business. When will Boies have a seat on the board? Bill -Original Message- From: James Melin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, November 20, 2003 4:19 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Gartner on SCO http://www3.gartner.com/DisplayDocument?doc_cd=118545
Re: Linux ready for the desktop: IBM
I exported my largest 123 for OS/2 spreadsheet as an XLS format, for import into OO. Some of it survived. The charts did not Bill -Original Message- From: Jim Elliott [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, November 17, 2003 9:36 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Linux ready for the desktop: IBM I agree, but there is SmartSuite with, AFAIK, IBM has no intention of porting to Linux. I don't know how many users there are outside IBM, but I'd guess the market for SS on Linux is pretty miniscule now. Back in the late 90s I might have bought it (but then, given how well it ran on OS/2 maybe not), but now OOo does what I need, and it's cheaper even than the OEM version of SS for Windows I have. John: The preferred solution for SmartSuite is to provide import/export filters for SS filetypes (.prz, .lwp, .wks, etc.) for OpenOffice. This is being worked on in IBM (and no, I don't know when these will be available). I would rather use an office suite which is actively being developed (i.e. OpenOffice) than one (i.e. SmartSuite) which is not. Jim
Re: [OT] US constitution (was RE: SCO Attacks Open Source License )
Stop this aspect of it... And f*rt as you leave the room -Original Message- From: Phil Payne [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, November 05, 2003 8:55 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [OT] US constitution (was RE: SCO Attacks Open Source License ) you conveniently left out what i was responding to. He said there are many people in the _US_ that don't give a rats ass. i couldn't care less what 1.2 billion in china think. and i'm sure they feel the same way. And the 1.5 billion Muslims the USA is currently pissing off something rotten. I take Neale's point that this discussion doesn't really belong here, and so I'll stop this aspect of it. But there is great relevance in the fact that there are over 6 billion people on the planet who are qualified - by virtue of them being Homo Sapiens - to take part in Open Source efforts. Only a relatively tiny (although to date pervasively active) proportion of those people have any allegiance to the US Constitution or legal framework. This thing is off and running. Genies and bottles. And any action taken in US courts by anyone is just noise. -- Phil Payne http://www.isham-research.com +44 7785 302 803
Re: SCO Attacks Open Source License
Adopting a US style Constitution would be a start... but then you'd have start looking up the back end of a rodent... Bill Beinert Systems Programming Con Edison When they took the fourth amendment, I was quiet because I didn't deal drugs! When they took the sixth amendment, I was quiet because, I was innocent. When they took the second amendment, I was quiet because I didn't own a gun! Now they've taken the first amendment, and I can say (or do) nothing about it. The Second Amendment is in place in case they ignore the others. MODWN DAbE -Original Message- From: Phil Payne [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, November 03, 2003 5:45 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: SCO Attacks Open Source License Happy 4th of July. A magnificent occasion. A bunch of honest English entrepreneurs and settlers finally broke away from a German king. I raise a glass to it every year. Unfortunately - we've still got the sods. Any advice on how to get rid of them would be appreciated. -- Phil Payne http://www.isham-research.com +44 7785 302 803
Re: Novell Announces Agreement to Acquire SUSE
Think Novell has learned that buying companies isn't enough? That you actually have to integrate and enhance them. Novell has blown more opportunities than (insert disgusting metaphor here). Bill -Original Message- From: Ferguson, Neale [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, November 04, 2003 9:17 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Novell Announces Agreement to Acquire SUSE See: http://linuxtoday.com/it_management/2003110401526NWBZSS;
Re: SCO Attacks Open Source License
Unfortunately, that opinion is shared by many US citizens -Original Message- From: Phil Payne [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, November 03, 2003 2:40 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: SCO Attacks Open Source License The GPL violates the U.S. Constitution, together with copyright, antitrust and export control laws, states SCO in documents filed with the U.S. District Court for Utah. Some of us don't give a hair from a rat's behind about the US Constitution. -- Phil Payne http://www.isham-research.com +44 7785 302 803
Re: SCO CEO's letter to Open Source Community
In my opinion, McBride (lowlife, sniveling dog that he is) nevertheless makes a valid point: that if Open Source does not have a mechanism in place to prevent a repetition of the SGI developer's violation of IP, then large enterprises will not take the risk of using it. Why use an OS if it allows people like SCO to crawl out from under a rock with a multimillion dollar lawsuit in hand? Bill Beinert Systems Programming Con Edison (212) 460-4853 When they took the fourth amendment, I was quiet because I didn't deal drugs! When they took the sixth amendment, I was quiet because, I was innocent. When they took the second amendment, I was quiet because I didn't own a gun! Now they've taken the first amendment, and I can say (or do) nothing about it. The Second Amendment is in place in case they ignore the others. MODWN DAbE
Re: Showdown looms for SCO-IBM?
Total value of the company is $129 Million - up from $40M before the suit. After they lose the case, it will be a penny stock, and we can buy it and GPL all of its IP. Bill -Original Message- From: Lionel Dyck [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 13, 2003 11:26 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Showdown looms for SCO-IBM? The stock symbol is SCOX (I thought it was SCO at first). The current price quote is $10.80 per share - and I still think a lottery ticket is a better investment. Lionel B. Dyck, Systems Software Lead Kaiser Permanente Information Technology 25 N. Via Monte Ave Walnut Creek, Ca 94598 Phone: (925) 926-5332 (tie line 8/473-5332) E-Mail:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sametime: (use Lotus Notes address) AIM:lbdyck
Re: The meddling continues:
I read in another post that MS does not plan to continue GeCad's current offerings. Bill -Original Message- From: Joe Poole [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2003 1:26 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: The meddling continues: GeCad software made a name for itself by developing the first anti-virus software to run on zLinux, and guess who just bought the technology? http://www.ravantivirus.com/pages/shownews.php?i=153 I wonder how long it will take before the Linux offerings are withdrawn?
Re: 1000th z800 Sold
I didn't think you could get a linux only z800. I thought you had to have at least one zOS enabled engine. Bill -Original Message- From: Ferguson, Neale [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, March 06, 2003 9:25 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: 1000th z800 Sold See: http://www-1.ibm.com/servers/eserver/zseries/news/pressreleases/2003/z_linux _grid_03-06-03.html?ca=zseriesme=Wmet=from_zvm Armonk, N.Y. and Gainesville, Fla., March 6, 2003 - IBM announced today that the University of Florida has selected the Linux-only IBM eServer zSeries 800 as the heart of the university's Advanced Computing and Information Systems (ACIS) laboratory at the school's Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering in Gainesville, Florida. snip
Re: Installing Red Hat 7.2 on an LPAR?
This is most excellent! I am installing Redhat, and the image files are different.. Should I replace SYS1.LINUX.TAPEIPL.IKR and SYS1.LINUX.INITRD with tapeinrd.img tapekrnl.img? And will the boot process be expecting to read the parmfile in ASCII? Thanks Bill -Original Message- From: Rob van der Heij [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, March 06, 2003 2:16 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Installing Red Hat 7.2 on an LPAR? Post, Mark K wrote: wrote a document on how to write the 3 starter files to disk so that you can IPL without using a tape, though. Take a look at http://linuxvm.org/Info/l390link.html and see if you can find the one that points to http://www.rvdheij.com/linuxipl.html
Re: Installing Red Hat 7.2 on an LPAR?
RedHat provide 2 sets of images, one for tape, one for DASD... 07/29/2002 02:57p 4,779,688 initrd.img 07/29/2002 01:28p 2,639,360 kernel.img 07/29/2002 02:59p 4,713,676 tapeinrd.img 07/29/2002 01:32p 2,631,168 tapekrnl.img I just want to confirm that the tape images are the ones I want to use... Bill -Original Message- From: Post, Mark K [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, March 06, 2003 2:06 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Installing Red Hat 7.2 on an LPAR? Change the names to match what ever you called the files. The parmfile can be in ASCII or EBCDIC. (At least that _used_ to be true.) Mark Post -Original Message- From: Beinert, William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, March 06, 2003 1:57 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Installing Red Hat 7.2 on an LPAR? This is most excellent! I am installing Redhat, and the image files are different.. Should I replace SYS1.LINUX.TAPEIPL.IKR and SYS1.LINUX.INITRD with tapeinrd.img tapekrnl.img? And will the boot process be expecting to read the parmfile in ASCII? Thanks Bill -Original Message- From: Rob van der Heij [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, March 06, 2003 2:16 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Installing Red Hat 7.2 on an LPAR? Post, Mark K wrote: wrote a document on how to write the 3 starter files to disk so that you can IPL without using a tape, though. Take a look at http://linuxvm.org/Info/l390link.html and see if you can find the one that points to http://www.rvdheij.com/linuxipl.html
Installing Red Hat 7.2 on an LPAR?
After downloading Redhat 7.2 onto my workstation and reading the doc, I decided to to an FTP install. At the HMC, I discover it is on an isolated network segment, and cannot (and will never) see my PC. Plan B: install from CD-ROM. But the doc refers to a Load from CDROM or Server icon on the HMC - and there is no such thing. Plan C: ? tape? Any other alternatives? TIA Bill Beinert Systems Programming Con Edison (212) 460-4853 When they took the fourth amendment, I was quiet because I didn't deal drugs! When they took the sixth amendment, I was quiet because, I was innocent. When they took the second amendment, I was quiet because I didn't own a gun! Now they've taken the first amendment, and I can say (or do) nothing about it. The Second Amendment is in place in case they ignore the others. MODWN DAbE
Re: Microsoft proud of XP compatibility
I think I live on a different planet than these people. I have programs I wrote on OS/2 1.2 that still run on Warp4. I have programs 30 years old that still run on OS/390 2.10 And it's not just MS. I installed a genealogy app last fall on RH Linux 7.2. I upgraded to RH 8.0 a month ago. And the app stopped working. With my alien mindset, it took me a day to figure out what broke... This is progress? Bill -Original Message- From: Phil Payne [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, February 25, 2003 9:26 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Microsoft proud of XP compatibility Only 5% of applications will see problems: http://zdnet.com.com/2100-1104-985820.html (About the same number that needed modifiying for Year 2000.) -- Phil Payne http://www.isham-research.com +44 7785 302 803 +49 173 6242039
Re: so correct me if I am wrong
The question is Is $45K less than what I would have to spend on an alternative architecture? How many Wintel or Sun boxes is that? You get a lot for free with Linux, but it still might not be enough to run production workloads. Bill -Original Message- From: Eric Bielefeld [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, February 21, 2003 9:09 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: so correct me if I am wrong I've been debating with myself whether I want to get a package, or download a package. This and other comments lead me to believe I'm better off staying away from SuSE. I had a discussion with my boss a few days ago about the cost of Linux. If you get VM, which I can see a real value in, that's $45K. Then, if you pay 10K or so for support every year, the free Linux isn't so cheap. Granted, that's a lot less than we spend for z/OS and all its related products, but for free software, there is still a substantial cost.. Is it easy to get RedHat support without buying support? Eric Bielefeld Sr. MVS Systems Programmer PH Mining Equipment Milwaukee, WI 414-671-7849 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: OT (almost) - boot Linux from CDROM on Intel? - thanks
Thanks. Knoppix is what I was looking for. Bill -Original Message- From: Rod Furey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, February 05, 2003 3:31 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: OT (almost) - boot Linux from CDROM on Intel? CD based SuSE Live Eval - as mentioned in Michael's post DemoLinux - www.demolinux.org Knoppix - www.knoppix.org There are various projects around the net that are working on this sort of thing as well. There are others that you can boot off floppies but these tend to be fairly small systems that are designed for rescue acts. A word of experience: I use a copy of the SuSE Eval CD when I'm fixing other people's PC problems. I got it off the front of Linux Format, one of the UK mags (which I read, I'm in no other way associated with them). It's a 7.1 release and unfortunately it doesn't pick up everything on all hardware. I've got a friend who's got a PackardBell laptop on it's side model and the mouse isn't picked up. Curiously enough, the Mandrake 7 release will find it if it's installed. Sometimes it won't pick up modems or sound cards either. Before the SuSE people jump on me I'd like to point out: 1 - I offer this as a reminder that some kit just isn't recognised 2 - I know it's old 3 - I'm on a dialup line so I'm not about to spend 24 hours downloading any newer version 4 - I use SuSE as my primary Linux install on 2 boxes at home (the other boxes being iMacs which are running OS 9 and/or OS X) as it was the only distro at the time that would correctly configure my X installation (and a good job it did of it too) Rod
OT (almost) - boot Linux from CDROM on Intel?
There was discussion (I think on this list) of a CDROM that allowed someone to boot and run Linux from a CDROM without installing Linux. I didn't pay much attention at the time, but now I think I know someone who could benefit from this. Can anyone refresh my memory? thanks Bill Beinert Systems Programming Con Edison (212) 460-4853 When they took the fourth amendment, I was quiet because I didn't deal drugs! When they took the sixth amendment, I was quiet because, I was innocent. When they took the second amendment, I was quiet because I didn't own a gun! Now they've taken the first amendment, and I can say (or do) nothing about it. The Second Amendment is in place in case they ignore the others. MODWN DAbE
Re: Redhat 7.1, 7.2, 8.0, s390, s390x?
7.2 is at ftp://ftp.redhat.com/pub/redhat/linux/7.2/en/os/s390/ Bill -Original Message- From: Alex Leyva [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 28, 2003 11:29 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Redhat 7.1, 7.2, 8.0, s390, s390x? Hi all, im downloading Redhat 7.1, but now im not sure about the 64 or 31 bits, im downloading it from: ftp.redhat.com/pub/redhat/linux/7.1/en/os/s390x/, in the 7.2 directory i only found s390, and looking at the mirror list (http://www.redhat.com/download/mirror.html) i see that the directory is /8.0/en/os/s390/, so, s390 is 31 bits and s390x is 64 bits?, 7.1 is the latest release for 64 bits and 8.0 for 31 bits? i only want to install redhat in our new z800 :( Thanks. -- Alejandro Leyva Rabinovich. Jefe de la Unidad Departamental de Soporte Ticnico (Administracisn de Mainframe). Direccisn General de Informatica. Secretarma de Finanzas. Gobierno del Distrito Federal.
Re: System Installation Suite on zSeries ?
You might want to look at Levanta, which I saw recently at LinuxWorld... http://www.linuxcare.com/products/levanta/features.epl Bill -Original Message- From: Seifert, Harald [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 27, 2003 8:59 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: System Installation Suite on zSeries ? I'm searching for a tool to clone Linux Images under z/VM. I have found in the IBM Redbook Linux on zSeries S/390: System Management Chapter 8 the System Installation Suite described, but there is stated that SIS is beta on zSeries. Does anyone have some experiences with SIS on zSeries ? -- Harald Seifert Informatik-Systemprogrammierung HUK Coburg Bahnhofsplatz 96444 Coburg Phone +049 (0)9561-961787 Fax+049 (0)9561-963671 Mailto [EMAIL PROTECTED]
