quota

2006-06-27 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hello linuxvm-list,
I have a z/VM 5.2 with gentoo linux running on it.
This works really great (I couldn't beleave that everything compiled
without problems) and currently I'm looking for a filesysteme for my root
partition.

At the moment it's reiserfs, but as far as I know the quota support for
reiser is broken / unstable.

So is there a recommendation which filesystem (xfs, jfs, reiserfs, ext3) to
use for the root partition especially if you want to use quota support (I
would like to know if my partition is running out of space, so if someone
has better ideas than quota, let me know)?

Regards Andreas




mail2web - Check your email from the web at
http://mail2web.com/ .

--
For LINUX-390 subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: INFO LINUX-390 or visit
http://www.marist.edu/htbin/wlvindex?LINUX-390


Re: quota

2006-06-27 Thread Fargusson.Alan
I vote for ext3.

The ext3 filesystem is the easiest to fix if something goes wrong.  The other 
filesystems may need some tweaking when something goes wrong.  When the root 
filesystem goes bad it can be very hard to fix problems because you may not be 
able to boot up cleanly and use the commands needed to work on the problem.

-Original Message-
From: Linux on 390 Port [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, June 27, 2006 2:22 AM
To: LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: quota


Hello linuxvm-list,
I have a z/VM 5.2 with gentoo linux running on it.
This works really great (I couldn't beleave that everything compiled
without problems) and currently I'm looking for a filesysteme for my root
partition.

At the moment it's reiserfs, but as far as I know the quota support for
reiser is broken / unstable.

So is there a recommendation which filesystem (xfs, jfs, reiserfs, ext3) to
use for the root partition especially if you want to use quota support (I
would like to know if my partition is running out of space, so if someone
has better ideas than quota, let me know)?

Regards Andreas




mail2web - Check your email from the web at
http://mail2web.com/ .

--
For LINUX-390 subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: INFO LINUX-390 or visit
http://www.marist.edu/htbin/wlvindex?LINUX-390

--
For LINUX-390 subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: INFO LINUX-390 or visit
http://www.marist.edu/htbin/wlvindex?LINUX-390


Re: quota

2006-06-27 Thread Dominic Coulombe

I also prefer ext3 for RW filesystems ans ext2 for RO filesystems.

It is very stable and easy to fix.




On 6/27/06, Fargusson.Alan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:


I vote for ext3.

The ext3 filesystem is the easiest to fix if something goes wrong.  The
other filesystems may need some tweaking when something goes wrong.  When
the root filesystem goes bad it can be very hard to fix problems because you
may not be able to boot up cleanly and use the commands needed to work on
the problem.

-Original Message-
From: Linux on 390 Port [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, June 27, 2006 2:22 AM
To: LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: quota


Hello linuxvm-list,
I have a z/VM 5.2 with gentoo linux running on it.
This works really great (I couldn't beleave that everything compiled
without problems) and currently I'm looking for a filesysteme for my root
partition.

At the moment it's reiserfs, but as far as I know the quota support for
reiser is broken / unstable.

So is there a recommendation which filesystem (xfs, jfs, reiserfs, ext3)
to
use for the root partition especially if you want to use quota support (I
would like to know if my partition is running out of space, so if someone
has better ideas than quota, let me know)?

Regards Andreas




mail2web - Check your email from the web at
http://mail2web.com/ .

--
For LINUX-390 subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: INFO LINUX-390 or
visit
http://www.marist.edu/htbin/wlvindex?LINUX-390

--
For LINUX-390 subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: INFO LINUX-390 or
visit
http://www.marist.edu/htbin/wlvindex?LINUX-390



--
For LINUX-390 subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: INFO LINUX-390 or visit
http://www.marist.edu/htbin/wlvindex?LINUX-390


Re: quota on LVM

2003-12-15 Thread Hall, Ken (IDS ECCS)
Did you run quotacheck on that filesystem?

The sequence is:

1) Add usrquota option to fstab
2) Run quotacheck to create the quota file
3) Run quotaon to enable quotas.

-Original Message-
From: Linux on 390 Port [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of
Alikhani
Sent: Sunday, December 14, 2003 12:25 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [LINUX-390] quota on LVM


Hi all
I have a problem for defining quota on LVM file system. I want to have
quota on /var/spool/mail that has been mounted on /dev/mailvg/maillv .
when I use quota tools the server says : can't initialize quotas on
/dev/mailvg/maillv . No such file or directory.

What can I do for solving this problem .

-- by regards Sophia


quota on LVM

2003-12-13 Thread Alikhani
Hi all
I have a problem for defining quota on LVM file system. I want to have
quota on /var/spool/mail that has been mounted on /dev/mailvg/maillv .
when I use quota tools the server says : can't initialize quotas on
/dev/mailvg/maillv . No such file or directory.
What can I do for solving this problem .

-- by regards Sophia


Re: Samba Quota function works well with SuSE ?

2002-10-15 Thread Michiyasu Takada

Thanks Alan and John.

Actually I tested SLES7 with Samba 2.2.0 and Red Hat Linux for S/390 with
Samba 2.2.1a-5 yesterday, but no problem occurred. The following
description in the Samba web site might not be necessarily true

http://us1.samba.org/samba/whatsnew/samba-2.2.5.html

Quota problems on a Linux 2.4 kernel.
-

Currently the quota interfaces have diverged between the Linus
2.4.x kernels and the Alan Cox 2.4.x kernels (the Alan Cox variants
are shipped with RedHat). Running quota-enabled Samba compiled on
an Alan Cox kernel works correctly on an Alan Cox kernel (the one
shipped by default with RedHat 7.x) but fails on a Linus kernel.

This is a mess, and hopefully Alan and Linus will sort it out soon.
In the meantime we need to ship.


 Michiyasu




  John Summerfield
  summer@computerdatasTo:   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  afe.com.au  cc:
  Sent by: Linux on 390Subject:  Re: Samba Quota function 
works well with SuSE ?
  Port
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  EDU


  2002/10/12 13:08
  Please respond to
  Linux on 390 Port





On Fri, 11 Oct 2002 21:28, you wrote:
 On Fri, 2002-10-11 at 14:02, Michiyasu Takada wrote:.

  As far as I know, Samba 2.2.x has a problem regarding quota with Linus
  kernel, and only Red Hat Linux with Alan Cox patch can handle this
  function.
  This customer is thinking of using SuSE Linux Enterprise Server 7 or 8
  (which will be available in near future), so they want to know SuSE can
  handle the Samba quota. Please let me know if this works well with
SuSE.

 While I'd love your customer to go with Red Hat ;) I'm actually not
 aware of such limitations.

Even if it were, there's no technical reason you couldn't use the Red Hat
source including patches to build a kernel for SuSE.

SuSE support might not like it a lot, but that's another matter.


--
Cheers
John Summerfield


Microsoft's most solid OS: http://www.geocities.com/rcwoolley/
Join the Linux Support by Small Businesses list at
http://mail.computerdatasafe.com.au/mailman/listinfo/lssb



Re: Samba Quota function works well with SuSE ?

2002-10-13 Thread John Summerfield

On Fri, 11 Oct 2002 21:28, you wrote:
 On Fri, 2002-10-11 at 14:02, Michiyasu Takada wrote:.

  As far as I know, Samba 2.2.x has a problem regarding quota with Linus
  kernel, and only Red Hat Linux with Alan Cox patch can handle this
  function.
  This customer is thinking of using SuSE Linux Enterprise Server 7 or 8
  (which will be available in near future), so they want to know SuSE can
  handle the Samba quota. Please let me know if this works well with SuSE.

 While I'd love your customer to go with Red Hat ;) I'm actually not
 aware of such limitations.

Even if it were, there's no technical reason you couldn't use the Red Hat
source including patches to build a kernel for SuSE.

SuSE support might not like it a lot, but that's another matter.


--
Cheers
John Summerfield


Microsoft's most solid OS: http://www.geocities.com/rcwoolley/
Join the Linux Support by Small Businesses list at
http://mail.computerdatasafe.com.au/mailman/listinfo/lssb



Re: Samba Quota function works well with SuSE ?

2002-10-11 Thread Alan Cox

On Fri, 2002-10-11 at 14:02, Michiyasu Takada wrote:.
 As far as I know, Samba 2.2.x has a problem regarding quota with Linus
 kernel, and only Red Hat Linux with Alan Cox patch can handle this
 function.
 This customer is thinking of using SuSE Linux Enterprise Server 7 or 8
 (which will be available in near future), so they want to know SuSE can
 handle the Samba quota. Please let me know if this works well with SuSE.

While I'd love your customer to go with Red Hat ;) I'm actually not
aware of such limitations.



Samba Quota function works well with SuSE ?

2002-10-11 Thread Michiyasu Takada
Hi all,

My customer is going to migrate their Windows file servers into Samba
running LINUXs on zSeries, but they are worried about the quota function
Samba provides.
As far as I know, Samba 2.2.x has a problem regarding quota with Linus
kernel, and only Red Hat Linux with Alan Cox patch can handle this
function.
This customer is thinking of using SuSE Linux Enterprise Server 7 or 8
(which will be available in near future), so they want to know SuSE can
handle the Samba quota. Please let me know if this works well with SuSE.

 Michiyasu Takada