RE: new version of nano-X/microwindows (not silly licence thing)
> > * wrote asm version of VGA driver for ELKS > > : > > : How much faster is this thing? Useable? > > > > > > It's definitely faster, and it works. I use it for the ELKS port, > > which runs on _slow_ systems. > >The old one was abismal even on my 386. Is the flickering/poor mouse >movement on ELKS any better? > Nope, that describes the mouse movement quite well! tom __ Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com
RE: new version of nano-X/microwindows (not silly licence thing)
On Tue, 5 Oct 1999, Greg Haerr wrote: > * wrote asm version of VGA driver for ELKS > : > : How much faster is this thing? Useable? > > > It's definitely faster, and it works. I use it for the ELKS port, > which runs on _slow_ systems. The old one was abismal even on my 386. Is the flickering/poor mouse movement on ELKS any better? Luke(Boo) Farrar.
Re: new version of nano-X/microwindows (not silly licence thing)
> > * wrote asm version of VGA driver for ELKS > >How much faster is this thing? Useable? > It works, it is kind of useble on a 386SX 16Mhz, the optimized hline definately speeds it up. tom __ Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com
RE: new version of nano-X/microwindows (not silly licence thing)
* wrote asm version of VGA driver for ELKS : : How much faster is this thing? Useable? It's definitely faster, and it works. I use it for the ELKS port, which runs on _slow_ systems. Greg
Re: new version of nano-X/microwindows (not silly licence thing)
On Mon, 4 Oct 1999, Greg Haerr wrote: > > The major changes in this release are: > > * wrote asm version of VGA driver for ELKS How much faster is this thing? Useable? Luke(Boo) Farrar.
