Re: Fix to All wake-up devices are disabled after suspend-to disk isn't yet included in mainline

2007-10-16 Thread Andrew Morton
On Wed, 17 Oct 2007 04:39:30 +0200 Maxim Levitsky [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 A while ago I asked on LKML about the problem of loosing all wake device 
 capabilities, after a suspend to disk
 (eg: I can't wake the system from keyboard if I suspend to disk and then to 
 ram)
 
 I was provided with the patch that fixes this problem completely.
 The merge window is open, but I still don't see it in the kernel.
 Due to changes it doesn't anymore apply to latest git.
 
 Was it missed?

No, it's in Len's git tree.

Len's git-pull request from a few days ago didn't work, perhaps because I
wanted to know if a recent -mm regression had been fixed and that hasn't
been answered yet.  I assume that Len is offline.  Other acpi developers
could presumably have answered that question but for some reason chose not to.

I'm presently holding off 20-odd power management patches due to their
dependency upon an acpi merge...
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-acpi in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


Re: Fix to All wake-up devices are disabled after suspend-to disk isn't yet included in mainline

2007-10-16 Thread Maxim Levitsky
On Wednesday 17 October 2007 05:48:02 Andrew Morton wrote:
 On Wed, 17 Oct 2007 04:39:30 +0200 Maxim Levitsky [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
  A while ago I asked on LKML about the problem of loosing all wake device 
  capabilities, after a suspend to disk
  (eg: I can't wake the system from keyboard if I suspend to disk and then to 
  ram)
  
  I was provided with the patch that fixes this problem completely.
  The merge window is open, but I still don't see it in the kernel.
  Due to changes it doesn't anymore apply to latest git.
  
  Was it missed?
 
 No, it's in Len's git tree.
 
 Len's git-pull request from a few days ago didn't work, perhaps because I
 wanted to know if a recent -mm regression had been fixed and that hasn't
 been answered yet.  I assume that Len is offline.  Other acpi developers
 could presumably have answered that question but for some reason chose not to.
 
 I'm presently holding off 20-odd power management patches due to their
 dependency upon an acpi merge...
 


Thanks a lot.
Best regards,
Maxim Levitsky
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-acpi in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html