Re: [PATCH 0/5] WMI patches for acpi-test (v2)

2008-02-06 Thread Bjorn Helgaas
On Tuesday 05 February 2008 07:03:23 pm Carlos Corbacho wrote:
 On Wednesday 06 February 2008 00:35:54 Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
   Ok. The only other vendors I really have in mind are HP and Fujitsu,
   since both those vendors use WMI on their laptops, so they would be my
   most likely candidates to have WMI on an IA64 box (if anyone actually
   does use WMI on IA64).
 
  How could I tell whether our HP systems use WMI?
 
 Do you have any PNP0C14 or *pnp0c14 _HID objects defined in the DSDTs for 
 your 
 systems? If not, then your systems don't use WMI.

I looked at DSDTs for a few HP ia64 systems (rx7620,
rx8640, and superdome), and none has a PNP0C14 object.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-acpi in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


Re: [PATCH 0/5] WMI patches for acpi-test (v2)

2008-02-05 Thread Carlos Corbacho
On Wednesday 06 February 2008 00:35:54 Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
  Ok. The only other vendors I really have in mind are HP and Fujitsu,
  since both those vendors use WMI on their laptops, so they would be my
  most likely candidates to have WMI on an IA64 box (if anyone actually
  does use WMI on IA64).

 How could I tell whether our HP systems use WMI?

Do you have any PNP0C14 or *pnp0c14 _HID objects defined in the DSDTs for your 
systems? If not, then your systems don't use WMI.

-Carlos
-- 
E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Web: strangeworlds.co.uk
GPG Key ID: 0x23EE722D
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-acpi in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html