Re: [RFC PATCH] spi: Ensure that CS line is in non-active state after setup

2015-03-09 Thread Andy Shevchenko
On Mon, Mar 9, 2015 at 9:11 AM, Ivan T. Ivanov iiva...@mm-sol.com wrote:

 On Sun, 2015-03-08 at 20:01 +, Mark Brown wrote:
 On Fri, Mar 06, 2015 at 05:45:15PM +0200, Ivan T. Ivanov wrote:

  if (spi-master-setup)
  status = spi-master-setup(spi);
  +   else
  +   spi_set_cs(spi, false);

 Why would this be conditional on there not being a setup operation?
 It's a good idea, I just don't see why the backstop isn't always useful.

 I was thinking that this is expected to be handled inside
 setup operation, nothing more.

Agree with Mark. It's perhaps a good idea to call unconditionally
before -setup().


-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-arm-msm in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


Re: [RFC PATCH] spi: Ensure that CS line is in non-active state after setup

2015-03-09 Thread Ivan T. Ivanov

On Sun, 2015-03-08 at 20:01 +, Mark Brown wrote:
 On Fri, Mar 06, 2015 at 05:45:15PM +0200, Ivan T. Ivanov wrote:
 
  if (spi-master-setup)
  status = spi-master-setup(spi);
  +   else
  +   spi_set_cs(spi, false);
 
 Why would this be conditional on there not being a setup operation?
 It's a good idea, I just don't see why the backstop isn't always useful.

I was thinking that this is expected to be handled inside
setup operation, nothing more.

Ivan 
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-arm-msm in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


Re: [RFC PATCH] spi: Ensure that CS line is in non-active state after setup

2015-03-08 Thread Mark Brown
On Fri, Mar 06, 2015 at 05:45:15PM +0200, Ivan T. Ivanov wrote:

   if (spi-master-setup)
   status = spi-master-setup(spi);
 + else
 + spi_set_cs(spi, false);

Why would this be conditional on there not being a setup operation?
It's a good idea, I just don't see why the backstop isn't always useful.


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


[RFC PATCH] spi: Ensure that CS line is in non-active state after setup

2015-03-06 Thread Ivan T. Ivanov
When drivers didn't provide setup() method, SPI core should ensure
that CS line is driven in non-active state after spi_setup().

Signed-off-by: Ivan T. Ivanov iiva...@mm-sol.com
---
 drivers/spi/spi.c | 2 ++
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/spi/spi.c b/drivers/spi/spi.c
index c64a3e5..bfba2d9 100644
--- a/drivers/spi/spi.c
+++ b/drivers/spi/spi.c
@@ -1895,6 +1895,8 @@ int spi_setup(struct spi_device *spi)

if (spi-master-setup)
status = spi-master-setup(spi);
+   else
+   spi_set_cs(spi, false);

dev_dbg(spi-dev, setup mode %d, %s%s%s%s%u bits/w, %u Hz max -- 
%d\n,
(int) (spi-mode  (SPI_CPOL | SPI_CPHA)),
--
1.9.1

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-arm-msm in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html