Re: [LAD] LinuxSampler questions
Es geschah am Tuesday 08 July 2008 als Julien Claassen schrieb: Hello! Please Christian or someone else, can you help me. I just reread the LinuxSampler features page and seems to be some way of marking points as implemented, not done or partly implemented. But I can really find those markings. Can someone give me a list of clearly marked features (clearly as in text not colours or other visually markings). Ah, yeah those markers are pictures on the site. A red cross for not yet implemented, a green check mark for implemented and a yellow circle for partly implemented. I guess we shall set the alternative name attribute for those, right? In particular I'm interested in the following: 1. Does LS support gigaStudio3? Partly, most of the gig3 stuff is supported now, only few things are missing, like convolution support and that special kind of filter (I cant remember its name right now). 2. Articluations (.art-files) That's partly implemented, but loading .art files doesn't work yet. 3. Convolution reverbs Like said above, no internal convolution yet. But I started to prepare internal effect support in LS, ... so ... :-) And another not completely related question: Is there a telnet equivalnet that supports a bit more line-editing and probably globbing. If I say telnet I mean the program telnet. It's just annoying when misstyping not being able to correct the typos and when entering long filenames not being able to complete them. JSampler (the Java based LS frontend application) provides a LSCP console with type completion etc. Try if it suits your needs. Hope that helps! CU Christian ___ Linux-audio-dev mailing list Linux-audio-dev@lists.linuxaudio.org http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-dev
Re: [LAD] LinuxSampler questions
Hi Fons! Yes I use scripting for the most part. But I found that sometimes I'd like to walk through the interface and check out new features, find some info and this gets really ugly. Kindest regards Julien Music was my first love and it will be my last (John Miles) FIND MY WEB-PROJECT AT: http://ltsb.sourceforge.net the Linux TextBased Studio guide === AND MY PERSONAL PAGES AT: === http://www.juliencoder.de ___ Linux-audio-dev mailing list Linux-audio-dev@lists.linuxaudio.org http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-dev
Re: [LAD] LinuxSampler questions
Es geschah am Tuesday 08 July 2008 als MarcOChapeau schrieb: On Tue, 8 Jul 2008 11:40:18 +0200, Christian Schoenebeck [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: 3. Convolution reverbs Like said above, no internal convolution yet. But I started to prepare internal effect support in LS, ... so ... :-) This might have already been asked/discussed, but does that mean LS could become a plugin host (LV2 or LDSPA) ? This would be very interesting. Yep, that's the plan. CU Christian ___ Linux-audio-dev mailing list Linux-audio-dev@lists.linuxaudio.org http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-dev
Re: [LAD] LinuxSampler questions
Es geschah am Tuesday 08 July 2008 als Christian Schoenebeck schrieb: Es geschah am Tuesday 08 July 2008 als MarcOChapeau schrieb: On Tue, 8 Jul 2008 11:40:18 +0200, Christian Schoenebeck [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: 3. Convolution reverbs Like said above, no internal convolution yet. But I started to prepare internal effect support in LS, ... so ... :-) This might have already been asked/discussed, but does that mean LS could become a plugin host (LV2 or LDSPA) ? This would be very interesting. Yep, that's the plan. Ah and the other way around as well. Andreas already had an experimental DSSI implementation of LS on his box. And Benno worked on a VSTi version. CU Christian ___ Linux-audio-dev mailing list Linux-audio-dev@lists.linuxaudio.org http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-dev
[LAD] Regarding the linux-audio lists announcing policy
I wonder if we could change the post-to-all-three-lists policy? I don't like to spam three mailing lists for everytime I announce a program, and it doesn't seem like everyone knows that we are supposed to post to all lists either. ___ Linux-audio-dev mailing list Linux-audio-dev@lists.linuxaudio.org http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-dev
Re: [LAD] Regarding the linux-audio lists announcing policy
On Tue, 2008-07-08 at 16:52 +0200, Kjetil S. Matheussen wrote: I wonder if we could change the post-to-all-three-lists policy? I don't like to spam three mailing lists for everytime I announce a program, and it doesn't seem like everyone knows that we are supposed to post to all lists either. Agreed. Not much point of an announce list if everyone spams all the lists anyway. Getting 3 emails instead of 1 is a bit annoying, especially since the point of the announce list existing is that the other lists are relatively high traffic. As for people not being subscribed, well... if you want announcements, subscribe to the announce list. Duh. :) There's an easily accessible archive on the web anyway -DR ___ Linux-audio-dev mailing list Linux-audio-dev@lists.linuxaudio.org http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-dev
Re: [LAD] Regarding the linux-audio lists announcing policy
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 MarcOChapeau wrote: On Tue, 08 Jul 2008 16:52:16 +0200 (CEST), Kjetil S. Matheussen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I wonder if we could change the post-to-all-three-lists policy? I don't like to spam three mailing lists for everytime I announce a program, and it doesn't seem like everyone knows that we are supposed to post to all lists either. Hi Kjetil, Robin Gareus has made last year an interesting study on this matter. It seems that the proportion of users that are subscribed to all three lists is quite small. So cross posting announces on the 3 lists isn't such a bad thing. Now regarding the fact that not everyone knows they should post on the 3 lists, I don't really think that's the case. most announces I see are posted at least on 2 lists. LAA is nearly always one of them. Some people choose to add LAD and LAU, some choose to add also their project list. I just ran the script again: as of July 8 2008 there are 1760 unique subscribers @linuxaudio.org's 4 lists (laa,lau,lad,consortium). The majority of users is subscribed to ONE list only. # [EMAIL PROTECTED] = head-count [1] = 1255 [2] = 315 [3] = 160 [4] = 30 so long, robin -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFIc42BeVUk8U+VK0IRAvq4AJ0WbEynpWrl71XGVi6SyW0q9VuZOwCfRiry ATg2dheRwpweXSucCn+7v5E= =Lzvy -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ Linux-audio-dev mailing list Linux-audio-dev@lists.linuxaudio.org http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-dev
Re: [LAD] Regarding the linux-audio lists announcing policy
Hallo, Dave Robillard hat gesagt: // Dave Robillard wrote: Agreed. Not much point of an announce list if everyone spams all the lists anyway. Getting 3 emails instead of 1 is a bit annoying, especially since the point of the announce list existing is that the other lists are relatively high traffic. In the pd-world, we had a similar discussion to get rid of double- and triple-announcements some time ago, and solved it so that mails to the announce list get forwarded to the main list automatically. So people who want to announce something, only send mails to pd-announce. If you subscribe pd-list, you automatically also receive pd-announce, while if you subscribe pd-announce only, you only get pd-announce mails. Ciao -- Frank Barknecht _ __footils.org__ ___ Linux-audio-dev mailing list Linux-audio-dev@lists.linuxaudio.org http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-dev
Re: [LAD] LinuxSampler questions
On Tue, 2008-07-08 at 12:30 +0200, Christian Schoenebeck wrote: Es geschah am Tuesday 08 July 2008 als Christian Schoenebeck schrieb: Es geschah am Tuesday 08 July 2008 als MarcOChapeau schrieb: On Tue, 8 Jul 2008 11:40:18 +0200, Christian Schoenebeck [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: 3. Convolution reverbs Like said above, no internal convolution yet. But I started to prepare internal effect support in LS, ... so ... :-) This might have already been asked/discussed, but does that mean LS could become a plugin host (LV2 or LDSPA) ? This would be very interesting. Yep, that's the plan. Ah and the other way around as well. Andreas already had an experimental DSSI implementation of LS on his box. This could be the biggest and most significant reason to provide DSSI support in Ardour. Please keep us informed about the status of this version. --p ___ Linux-audio-dev mailing list Linux-audio-dev@lists.linuxaudio.org http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-dev
Re: [LAD] Regarding the linux-audio lists announcing policy
On Tue, 8 Jul 2008 19:27:41 +0200, Frank Barknecht [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hallo, Dave Robillard hat gesagt: // Dave Robillard wrote: Agreed. Not much point of an announce list if everyone spams all the lists anyway. Getting 3 emails instead of 1 is a bit annoying, especially since the point of the announce list existing is that the other lists are relatively high traffic. In the pd-world, we had a similar discussion to get rid of double- and triple-announcements some time ago, and solved it so that mails to the announce list get forwarded to the main list automatically. So people who want to announce something, only send mails to pd-announce. If you subscribe pd-list, you automatically also receive pd-announce, while if you subscribe pd-announce only, you only get pd-announce mails. Interesting suggestion. I guess this could work. This means that there should be some web page somewhere stating the rules that I could use in a template for denied emails. Other ideas anyone ? -- Marc-Olivier Barre -- --- MarcO'Chapeau - www.marcochapeau.org - ___ Linux-audio-dev mailing list Linux-audio-dev@lists.linuxaudio.org http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-dev
