[LAD] Current state of lash
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi there, I'm currently thinking about using lash for my project. But their website is down, when I used it a year ago it was worked like crap with crashing etc. Therefore I'm wondering how the actual state of this project is(is it stable?) and if you recommend using it for developing. Christian -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v2.0.9 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iEYEARECAAYFAkn0Pr8ACgkQVC26eJ+o0+1YBwCdHdRHBipMT2i2xhekT0KHcGPX c7kAmwewYmhyoIf8XLhNQ5S4nKW6mOph =5UZj -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ Linux-audio-dev mailing list Linux-audio-dev@lists.linuxaudio.org http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-dev
Re: [LAD] Current state of lash
On Sunday 26 April 2009 14:00:15 Christian wrote: Hi there, I'm currently thinking about using lash for my project. But their website is down, when I used it a year ago it was worked like crap with crashing etc. Therefore I'm wondering how the actual state of this project is(is it stable?) and if you recommend using it for developing. Christian Hi, In a nutshell: it's not stable. I'm still looking for some time to put pen to paper and enumerate the main concerns voiced about LASH at this years Linux Audio Conference. Afterwards you will see new commits in the LASH development repository, and so things will move forward again. In the meantime, what kind of project are you working on? I'd love to hear what it is precisely you need from LASH. Juuso LASH developer (who probably should be shot for his recent inactivity) PS: The website is missing because some DNS issues, I don't know very much of it. ___ Linux-audio-dev mailing list Linux-audio-dev@lists.linuxaudio.org http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-dev
Re: [LAD] Current state of lash
Christian wrote: Hi there, I'm currently thinking about using lash for my project. But their website is down, when I used it a year ago it was worked like crap with crashing etc. Therefore I'm wondering how the actual state of this project is(is it stable?) and if you recommend using it for developing. Christian juuso did an interesting presentation on LAC. you can find the slides at http://lad.linuxaudio.org/events/2009_cdm/slides/ . the video is not up yet, but should be rsn. if nobody else follows up on this thread, you might try jack-devel instead, or get a quick round of opinions on #jack at irc.freenode.net. best, jörn ___ Linux-audio-dev mailing list Linux-audio-dev@lists.linuxaudio.org http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-dev
Re: [LAD] [OT] gdm setup in F10
I am currently using FC9 and it allows me to select the window manager of my choice on login. As I had FC7 in the machine previously, with fluxbox, when I upgraded it seemed to kept it (or update it), so I had no problems. I'm about to go FC10, but I will wait to see more answers to this query. Have you got the FC WindowMaker package installed or is it a custom -built version you have? The FC package should give you an extra login option, but what do I know... Victor - Original Message - From: Fons Adriaensen f...@kokkinizita.net To: Linux Audio Developers linux-audio-dev@lists.linuxaudio.org Sent: Sunday, April 26, 2009 1:22 AM Subject: [LAD] [OT] gdm setup in F10 Just installed Fedora 10. It comes with Gnome as the default desktop of course. Previous versions of gdm at least allowed me to select just WindowMaker, but the option has been removed, as well (AFAICS) gdmsetup. So will F10 allow me to use WindowMaker without having to hack some deep internals ? If not I'll just revert to F8. And if this trend continues I could as well forget about Linux and use Windows. Is there any Linux distro left that does not depend on all the *Kit crap ? Ciao, -- FA Io lo dico sempre: l'Italia è troppo stretta e lunga. ___ Linux-audio-dev mailing list Linux-audio-dev@lists.linuxaudio.org http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-dev ___ Linux-audio-dev mailing list Linux-audio-dev@lists.linuxaudio.org http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-dev
Re: [LAD] Current state of lash
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 My project heavily depends on osc communication. There's a server which every app registers on. So the main timer, the sequencer and eg. a lv2-synth and mixer are all clients of this server. The guis for these apps then query the server for the actual app(sequencer/timer...) and connect to them. As you can see there are many different applications running and some of them have audio/midi connections. If I know want to store this setup it comes to(what I read in the past in the papers of it) lash. As I think lash could handle the correct app-startup-order and connections, therefore I can easily restore the whole project. If it is not possible to use lash for this I have to possibilities. 1. Help you :) But I don't know if I've got the time for this and how long it takes to get into the project. 2. As the server stores every app(except guis, which then need to be stored, too), it can start these apps and tell them where to connect to. Would be relatively easy to implement but is not compatible lash, which I hope will become standard. Before anyone asks, the main aim of the project is to create a groovebox-pc, so non-linear step-sequencing, network distributed access for multiple musicians and heavy lv2 usage are its main aims. On Sunday 26 April 2009 14:00:15 Christian wrote: Hi there, I'm currently thinking about using lash for my project. But their website is down, when I used it a year ago it was worked like crap with crashing etc. Therefore I'm wondering how the actual state of this project is(is it stable?) and if you recommend using it for developing. Christian Hi, In a nutshell: it's not stable. I'm still looking for some time to put pen to paper and enumerate the main concerns voiced about LASH at this years Linux Audio Conference. Afterwards you will see new commits in the LASH development repository, and so things will move forward again. In the meantime, what kind of project are you working on? I'd love to hear what it is precisely you need from LASH. Juuso LASH developer (who probably should be shot for his recent inactivity) PS: The website is missing because some DNS issues, I don't know very much of it. -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v2.0.9 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iEYEARECAAYFAkn0TC8ACgkQVC26eJ+o0+00BwCcDendvb6ET/ZsH5TpdjNK6UMK ijgAnjK0TVCzlf1q2a18UWDZmNOStP/l =BbN9 -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ Linux-audio-dev mailing list Linux-audio-dev@lists.linuxaudio.org http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-dev
[LAD] whither Phasex ?
Greetings, The Phasex site is now a porn list. The author of this neat synth seems to have disappeared. I suggest that someone put the last source code on a public ftp site. Best, dp ___ Linux-audio-dev mailing list Linux-audio-dev@lists.linuxaudio.org http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-dev
Re: [LAD] whither Phasex ?
On Sun, 26 Apr 2009 09:49:24 -0400 Dave Phillips dlphill...@woh.rr.com wrote: Greetings, The Phasex site is now a porn list. The author of this neat synth seems to have disappeared. I suggest that someone put the last source code on a public ftp site. Best, dp Hi Dave, I noticed the same one or two weeks ago. Where do you suggest to put the source? I temporarily put it up here: http://mufu.diokhan.at/public/phasex/phasex-0.11.1.tar.gz But beware, I have practically no control over the server/domain and there are bandwidth and data volume constrains. I'd really like it to find a new home and optimally a maintainer/developer since it is a really nice sounding and fun synth (but sadly pretty much unusable for me atm). Best regards, Philipp ___ Linux-audio-dev mailing list Linux-audio-dev@lists.linuxaudio.org http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-dev
Re: [LAD] whither Phasex ?
Den Sunday 26 April 2009 15.49.24 skrev Dave Phillips: Greetings, The Phasex site is now a porn list. The author of this neat synth seems to have disappeared. It seems that the domain expired the 7 days ago. It is still cached by Google[1]. Just click on cached. I found sysex.net through dnshistory.org[2]. But unfortunately there is no way to get to sysex.net because it is probably a virtual domain at lysdexia.org[3] (ww's other domain that also seems to have expired). lysdexia.org can still be reached[4]. [1] http://www.google.se/search?q=site%3Asysex.netie=utf-8oe=utf-8aq=trls=org.mozilla:sv-SE:officialclient=firefox-a [2] http://dnshistory.org/browsedomains/sysex.net. [3] http://dnshistory.org/browsedomains/lysdexia.org. [4] http://207.55.232.252/ /bengan ___ Linux-audio-dev mailing list Linux-audio-dev@lists.linuxaudio.org http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-dev
Re: [LAD] Can't load firmware on RME HammerFall DigiFace
Hi Natanael, I can't make it work, on a Dell notebook using UbuntuStudio Hardy (kernel 2.6.24-24-rt) x86_64... Not related, but: Why are you using a two year old kernel? If I boot with the cardbus attached the machine see the card, but I can't load the firmware. I attach some related info (interruptions, pci slots, etc..). Did the card work before or is this your first try? I have never before seen this Cardbus chip, but if the card is initialized properly, it shouldn't be a problem. On the DigiFace, the red Host LED stays on all the time? Just to make sure everything is ok with the interface, cabling and the DigiFace, do you have another notebook to test with? -- Flo ___ Linux-audio-dev mailing list Linux-audio-dev@lists.linuxaudio.org http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-dev
Re: [LAD] Can't load firmware on RME HammerFall DigiFace
Natanael, Did the card work before or is this your first try? It works on Windows, and it worked on Ub. Intrepid (hdsploader just complained about the .bin place, and I copied from the alsa source package...). It sounds like a problem with the cardbus driver. I've seen these strange phenomena a dozen times, and it was always a problem with the cardbus chipset/driver. If it worked with Intrepid (whatever that is), then please find out what has changed since then. It is obviously not a problem with the hdsp driver. -- Flo ___ Linux-audio-dev mailing list Linux-audio-dev@lists.linuxaudio.org http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-dev