Re: [LAD] Fwd: Fw: Re: At the hands of Professor Keller and Raymond
On Sunday, 2 August 2009 at 21:36, Jörn Nettingsmeier wrote: > can we please bury this urban myth that anybody who releases software > under the gpl is legally bound to include makefiles and such? "The source code for a work means the preferred form of the work for making modifications to it. For an executable work, complete source code means all the source code for all modules it contains, plus any associated interface definition files, PLUS THE SCRIPTS USED TO CONTROL COMPILATION AND INSTALLATION OF THE EXECUTABLE." Emphasis mine, from the GPL v2. ___ Linux-audio-dev mailing list Linux-audio-dev@lists.linuxaudio.org http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-dev
Re: [LAD] Fwd: Fw: Re: At the hands of Professor Keller and Raymond
On Tuesday, 28 July 2009 at 9:19, lase...@gmail.com wrote: > When doing the right thing causes people to almost line up against the one in > the right [...] People don't oppose you for "doing the right thing", but for being a self-righteous pompous a** who doesn't know when to shut up while doing it. > Can you see more now the kind of person he is? Mainly people see what kind of person you are. *puts his cluebat away and hides again* ___ Linux-audio-dev mailing list Linux-audio-dev@lists.linuxaudio.org http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-dev
Re: [LAD] jackd/jackdbus : D-Bus or not D-Bus...
On Tuesday, 19 May 2009 at 10:38, Stéphane Letz wrote: > 4) A possible proposed solution was to define 2 completely separated > packages for jack2 : the "classic" one would package the "jackd" > incarnation and allow Qjackctl and legacy control applications to be > used with it. The "D-Bus" one would package the "jackdbus" > incarnation, and provide D-Bus bas control applications (patchage, > ladi tools). Wouldn't a dbus-based control application jackd work? I.e. a wrapper around the dbus jack that behaves like the old jackd? (It seems like the obvious solution to me, but I haven't read that much of this discussion, just part of what was on this list, so if this is the stupid kind of obvious, just ignore me.) ___ Linux-audio-dev mailing list Linux-audio-dev@lists.linuxaudio.org http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-dev
