Re: [PATCH v2] blkcg: add sanity check for blkcg policy operations
On Wed, Oct 11, 2017 at 10:51:32AM -0600, Jens Axboe wrote: > On 10/11/2017 03:46 AM, weiping zhang wrote: > > blkcg policy should keep cpd/pd's alloc_fn and free_fn in pairs, > > otherwise policy would register fail. > > > > Signed-off-by: weiping zhang > > --- > > block/blk-cgroup.c | 10 ++ > > 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+) > > > > diff --git a/block/blk-cgroup.c b/block/blk-cgroup.c > > index e7ec676..67b01c5 100644 > > --- a/block/blk-cgroup.c > > +++ b/block/blk-cgroup.c > > @@ -1419,6 +1419,16 @@ int blkcg_policy_register(struct blkcg_policy *pol) > > if (i >= BLKCG_MAX_POLS) > > goto err_unlock; > > > > + /* Make sure cpd_alloc_fn and cpd_free_fn in pairs */ > > + if ((pol->cpd_alloc_fn && !pol->cpd_free_fn) || > > + (!pol->cpd_alloc_fn && pol->cpd_free_fn)) > > + goto err_unlock; > > This might be cleaner (and more readable) as: > > if (!pol->cpd_alloc_fn ^ !pol->cpd_free_fn) > goto err_unlock; > > Ditto for the pd part. > Really nice, I'll send v3. Thanks
Re: [PATCH v2] blkcg: add sanity check for blkcg policy operations
On 10/11/2017 03:46 AM, weiping zhang wrote: > blkcg policy should keep cpd/pd's alloc_fn and free_fn in pairs, > otherwise policy would register fail. > > Signed-off-by: weiping zhang > --- > block/blk-cgroup.c | 10 ++ > 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/block/blk-cgroup.c b/block/blk-cgroup.c > index e7ec676..67b01c5 100644 > --- a/block/blk-cgroup.c > +++ b/block/blk-cgroup.c > @@ -1419,6 +1419,16 @@ int blkcg_policy_register(struct blkcg_policy *pol) > if (i >= BLKCG_MAX_POLS) > goto err_unlock; > > + /* Make sure cpd_alloc_fn and cpd_free_fn in pairs */ > + if ((pol->cpd_alloc_fn && !pol->cpd_free_fn) || > + (!pol->cpd_alloc_fn && pol->cpd_free_fn)) > + goto err_unlock; This might be cleaner (and more readable) as: if (!pol->cpd_alloc_fn ^ !pol->cpd_free_fn) goto err_unlock; Ditto for the pd part. -- Jens Axboe
[PATCH v2] blkcg: add sanity check for blkcg policy operations
blkcg policy should keep cpd/pd's alloc_fn and free_fn in pairs, otherwise policy would register fail. Signed-off-by: weiping zhang --- block/blk-cgroup.c | 10 ++ 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+) diff --git a/block/blk-cgroup.c b/block/blk-cgroup.c index e7ec676..67b01c5 100644 --- a/block/blk-cgroup.c +++ b/block/blk-cgroup.c @@ -1419,6 +1419,16 @@ int blkcg_policy_register(struct blkcg_policy *pol) if (i >= BLKCG_MAX_POLS) goto err_unlock; + /* Make sure cpd_alloc_fn and cpd_free_fn in pairs */ + if ((pol->cpd_alloc_fn && !pol->cpd_free_fn) || + (!pol->cpd_alloc_fn && pol->cpd_free_fn)) + goto err_unlock; + + /* Make sure pd_alloc_fn and pd_free_fn in pairs */ + if ((pol->pd_alloc_fn && !pol->pd_free_fn) || + (!pol->pd_alloc_fn && pol->pd_free_fn)) + goto err_unlock; + /* register @pol */ pol->plid = i; blkcg_policy[pol->plid] = pol; -- 2.9.4