The coverity runs had a false positive complaining that
save_ptr is uninitialized in the call to strtok_r.

Turns out that under the covers glibc was doing enough
to confuse the checker about what was being called.

Just to keep the noise down, do a harmless initialization,
with a comment as to why.

Signed-off-by: Eric Sandeen <sand...@redhat.com>
---

V3: Keep strtok_r for old compat, and just init the var.

diff --git a/cmds-balance.c b/cmds-balance.c
index b671e1d..f5dc317 100644
--- a/cmds-balance.c
+++ b/cmds-balance.c
@@ -67,7 +67,7 @@ static int parse_one_profile(const char *profile, u64 *flags)
 static int parse_profiles(char *profiles, u64 *flags)
 {
        char *this_char;
-       char *save_ptr;
+       char *save_ptr = NULL; /* Satisfy static checkers */
 
        for (this_char = strtok_r(profiles, "|", &save_ptr);
             this_char != NULL;
@@ -136,7 +136,7 @@ static int parse_filters(char *filters, struct 
btrfs_balance_args *args)
 {
        char *this_char;
        char *value;
-       char *save_ptr;
+       char *save_ptr = NULL; /* Satisfy static checkers */
 
        if (!filters)
                return 0;


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to