Re: [PATCH] btrfs: remove redundant assignment and check on variable ret
On 09/05/17 17:55, Liu Bo wrote: > On Sat, May 06, 2017 at 11:01:05PM +0100, Colin King wrote: >> From: Colin Ian King >> >> Variable ret is assigned to zero and is always zero throughout the >> function. Thus the check for ret being less than zero is always >> false and so mapping_set_error always has an -EIO error passed to >> it. Hence we can remove the redundant assignment and check on ret. >> >> Detected by CoverityScan, CID#1414312 ("Logically dead code") >> >> Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King >> --- >> fs/btrfs/extent_io.c | 4 +--- >> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/fs/btrfs/extent_io.c b/fs/btrfs/extent_io.c >> index d8da3edf2ac3..7922cd34ba82 100644 >> --- a/fs/btrfs/extent_io.c >> +++ b/fs/btrfs/extent_io.c >> @@ -2447,7 +2447,6 @@ void end_extent_writepage(struct page *page, int err, >> u64 start, u64 end) >> { >> int uptodate = (err == 0); >> struct extent_io_tree *tree; >> -int ret = 0; >> >> tree = &BTRFS_I(page->mapping->host)->io_tree; >> >> @@ -2458,8 +2457,7 @@ void end_extent_writepage(struct page *page, int err, >> u64 start, u64 end) >> if (!uptodate) { >> ClearPageUptodate(page); >> SetPageError(page); >> -ret = ret < 0 ? ret : -EIO; >> -mapping_set_error(page->mapping, ret); >> +mapping_set_error(page->mapping, -EIO); > > The passed 'err' should be used as what ret did, ie. > ret = err < 0 ? err : -EIO; Ah, so the err passed into the function should be used instead of ret, which makes more sense. Got it. I'll send a fix for that. Colin > > Thanks, > > -liubo >> } >> } >> >> -- >> 2.11.0 >> >> -- >> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in >> the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org >> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kernel-janitors" in > the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Re: [PATCH] btrfs: remove redundant assignment and check on variable ret
On Sat, May 06, 2017 at 11:01:05PM +0100, Colin King wrote: > From: Colin Ian King > > Variable ret is assigned to zero and is always zero throughout the > function. Thus the check for ret being less than zero is always > false and so mapping_set_error always has an -EIO error passed to > it. Hence we can remove the redundant assignment and check on ret. > > Detected by CoverityScan, CID#1414312 ("Logically dead code") > > Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King > --- > fs/btrfs/extent_io.c | 4 +--- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/fs/btrfs/extent_io.c b/fs/btrfs/extent_io.c > index d8da3edf2ac3..7922cd34ba82 100644 > --- a/fs/btrfs/extent_io.c > +++ b/fs/btrfs/extent_io.c > @@ -2447,7 +2447,6 @@ void end_extent_writepage(struct page *page, int err, > u64 start, u64 end) > { > int uptodate = (err == 0); > struct extent_io_tree *tree; > - int ret = 0; > > tree = &BTRFS_I(page->mapping->host)->io_tree; > > @@ -2458,8 +2457,7 @@ void end_extent_writepage(struct page *page, int err, > u64 start, u64 end) > if (!uptodate) { > ClearPageUptodate(page); > SetPageError(page); > - ret = ret < 0 ? ret : -EIO; > - mapping_set_error(page->mapping, ret); > + mapping_set_error(page->mapping, -EIO); The passed 'err' should be used as what ret did, ie. ret = err < 0 ? err : -EIO; Thanks, -liubo > } > } > > -- > 2.11.0 > > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in > the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Re: [PATCH] btrfs: remove redundant assignment and check on variable ret
On Sat, May 06, 2017 at 11:01:05PM +0100, Colin King wrote: > From: Colin Ian King > > Variable ret is assigned to zero and is always zero throughout the > function. Thus the check for ret being less than zero is always > false and so mapping_set_error always has an -EIO error passed to > it. Hence we can remove the redundant assignment and check on ret. > > Detected by CoverityScan, CID#1414312 ("Logically dead code") > > Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King Reviewed-by: David Sterba -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html