Re: [PATCH 0/5] Mutually exclusive ops fixes

2013-01-21 Thread David Sterba
On Sun, Jan 20, 2013 at 05:22:27PM +0200, Ilya Dryomov wrote:
> This is a set of fixes for mutually exclusive ops stuff added by Stefan
> as part of the dev-replace patchset.  The main one here is the first
> patch, it fixes a regression in balancing interface.  The second patch
> brings EINVAL error code back.  The rest are relatively minor ordering
> fixes.
> 
> Ilya Dryomov (5):
>   Btrfs: bring back balance pause/resume logic
>   Btrfs: fix "mutually exclusive op is running" error code
>   Btrfs: fix unlock order in btrfs_ioctl_resize
>   Btrfs: fix unlock order in btrfs_ioctl_rm_dev
>   Btrfs: reorder locks and sanity checks in btrfs_ioctl_defrag

1-5
Reviewed-by: David Sterba 
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


Re: [PATCH 0/5] Mutually exclusive ops fixes

2013-01-20 Thread Ilya Dryomov
On Sun, Jan 20, 2013 at 05:22:27PM +0200, Ilya Dryomov wrote:
> Hello,
> 
> This is a set of fixes for mutually exclusive ops stuff added by Stefan
> as part of the dev-replace patchset.  The main one here is the first
> patch, it fixes a regression in balancing interface.  The second patch
> brings EINVAL error code back.  The rest are relatively minor ordering
> fixes.

You can pull from

git://github.com/idryomov/btrfs-unstable.git mutex-ops@next-master

top commit 2f68aafa90fedb3cdb80f0a8517a2130c5c035b0

Thanks,

Ilya
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html