On Tue, Jun 29, 2010 at 08:57:54AM +0800, Miao Xie wrote:
> Hi,
>
> on 2010-6-28 19:17, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> > The break was in front of the "nr = i" assignment so that was never hit.
>
> This bug has been fixed a month ago, and the patch has been merged into the
> btrfs-unstable tree.
This was one that we took out to keep the pull request down to the
critical fixes. That function actually isn't called, I'll just remove
it.
-chris
>
> http://marc.info/?l=linux-btrfs&m=127434036913484&w=2
>
> Thanks
> Miao
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter
> >
> > diff --git a/fs/btrfs/ctree.c b/fs/btrfs/ctree.c
> > index 0d1d966..ceb8ad2 100644
> > --- a/fs/btrfs/ctree.c
> > +++ b/fs/btrfs/ctree.c
> > @@ -3453,8 +3453,8 @@ int btrfs_insert_some_items(struct btrfs_trans_handle
> > *trans,
> > for (i = 0; i < nr; i++) {
> > if (total_size + data_size[i] + sizeof(struct btrfs_item) >
> > BTRFS_LEAF_DATA_SIZE(root)) {
> > - break;
> > nr = i;
> > + break;
> > }
> > total_data += data_size[i];
> > total_size += data_size[i] + sizeof(struct btrfs_item);
> > --
> > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
> > the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
> > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
