Re: btrfs day 1
On Thu, 2008-08-14 at 00:11 -0700, Stephen Hemminger wrote: Setup new 60G home partition on laptop as a real life test of 0.16. Using Ubuntu standard kernel 2.6.24-19-generic on i386 I notice that during normal (busy time) everything seems fine, but after going away for a while and coming back, it seems sluggish. Lots of errors in log: btrfs csum failed ino 139988 off 4583424 csum 3821684403 private 0 btrfs csum failed ino 139988 off 4579328 csum 3233603900 private 0 btrfs csum failed ino 139988 off 4575232 csum 306171610 private 0 Maybe it isn't handleing spindown properly? or something like that? Hi, I think the btrfs-unstable tree should have fixes for all of this. I know you had moved back to ext3 for now, but just wanted to follow up. -chris -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-btrfs in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Re: btrfs day 1
On Thu, 2008-08-14 at 09:19 -0700, Stephen Hemminger wrote: On Thu, 14 Aug 2008 06:25:14 -0400 Chris Mason [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Thu, 2008-08-14 at 00:11 -0700, Stephen Hemminger wrote: Setup new 60G home partition on laptop as a real life test of 0.16. Using Ubuntu standard kernel 2.6.24-19-generic on i386 Thanks for giving things a try I notice that during normal (busy time) everything seems fine, but after going away for a while and coming back, it seems sluggish. Lots of errors in log: btrfs csum failed ino 139988 off 4583424 csum 3821684403 private 0 btrfs csum failed ino 139988 off 4579328 csum 3233603900 private 0 btrfs csum failed ino 139988 off 4575232 csum 306171610 private 0 Could you please send me your kernel .config? Haven't been able to nail this down yet. -chris -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-btrfs in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Re: btrfs day 1
On Thu, 14 Aug 2008 14:21:22 -0400 Chris Mason [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Thu, 2008-08-14 at 11:06 -0700, Stephen Hemminger wrote: So, the question is why the kernel compile workload works for me. What kind of hardware are you running (ram, cpu, disks?) Intel(R) Core(TM)2 Duo CPU T7700 @ 2.40GHz Memory 2G Disk 80G (partition was 20G) It seems you have the secret to corrupting things. I'll try to reproduce with smaller partitions and less ram here. -chris Actually, the partition that got corrupted was 60G -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-btrfs in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
