Re: [PATCH 1/2] crypto: marvell - Don't copy hash operation twice into the SRAM

2016-12-02 Thread Boris Brezillon
On Fri,  2 Dec 2016 17:05:50 +0100
Romain Perier  wrote:

> No need to copy the template of an hash operation twice into the SRAM
> from the step function.
> 
> Fixes: commit 85030c5168f1 ("crypto: marvell - Add support for chai...")
> Signed-off-by: Romain Perier 

Acked-by: Boris Brezillon 

> ---
>  drivers/crypto/marvell/hash.c | 3 ---
>  1 file changed, 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/crypto/marvell/hash.c b/drivers/crypto/marvell/hash.c
> index 2a92605..fbbcbf8 100644
> --- a/drivers/crypto/marvell/hash.c
> +++ b/drivers/crypto/marvell/hash.c
> @@ -172,9 +172,6 @@ static void mv_cesa_ahash_std_step(struct ahash_request 
> *req)
>   for (i = 0; i < digsize / 4; i++)
>   writel_relaxed(creq->state[i], engine->regs + CESA_IVDIG(i));
>  
> - mv_cesa_adjust_op(engine, >op_tmpl);
> - memcpy_toio(engine->sram, >op_tmpl, sizeof(creq->op_tmpl));
> -
>   if (creq->cache_ptr)
>   memcpy_toio(engine->sram + CESA_SA_DATA_SRAM_OFFSET,
>   creq->cache, creq->cache_ptr);

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-crypto" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


Re: [PATCH 1/2] crypto: marvell - Don't copy hash operation twice into the SRAM

2016-12-02 Thread Boris Brezillon
On Fri,  2 Dec 2016 17:05:50 +0100
Romain Perier  wrote:

> No need to copy the template of an hash operation twice into the SRAM
> from the step function.
> 
> Fixes: commit 85030c5168f1 ("crypto: marvell - Add support for chai...")
> Signed-off-by: Romain Perier 

Oh, and please add

Cc: 

to both patches.

> ---
>  drivers/crypto/marvell/hash.c | 3 ---
>  1 file changed, 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/crypto/marvell/hash.c b/drivers/crypto/marvell/hash.c
> index 2a92605..fbbcbf8 100644
> --- a/drivers/crypto/marvell/hash.c
> +++ b/drivers/crypto/marvell/hash.c
> @@ -172,9 +172,6 @@ static void mv_cesa_ahash_std_step(struct ahash_request 
> *req)
>   for (i = 0; i < digsize / 4; i++)
>   writel_relaxed(creq->state[i], engine->regs + CESA_IVDIG(i));
>  
> - mv_cesa_adjust_op(engine, >op_tmpl);
> - memcpy_toio(engine->sram, >op_tmpl, sizeof(creq->op_tmpl));
> -
>   if (creq->cache_ptr)
>   memcpy_toio(engine->sram + CESA_SA_DATA_SRAM_OFFSET,
>   creq->cache, creq->cache_ptr);

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-crypto" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[PATCH 1/2] crypto: marvell - Don't copy hash operation twice into the SRAM

2016-12-02 Thread Romain Perier
No need to copy the template of an hash operation twice into the SRAM
from the step function.

Fixes: commit 85030c5168f1 ("crypto: marvell - Add support for chai...")
Signed-off-by: Romain Perier 
---
 drivers/crypto/marvell/hash.c | 3 ---
 1 file changed, 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/crypto/marvell/hash.c b/drivers/crypto/marvell/hash.c
index 2a92605..fbbcbf8 100644
--- a/drivers/crypto/marvell/hash.c
+++ b/drivers/crypto/marvell/hash.c
@@ -172,9 +172,6 @@ static void mv_cesa_ahash_std_step(struct ahash_request 
*req)
for (i = 0; i < digsize / 4; i++)
writel_relaxed(creq->state[i], engine->regs + CESA_IVDIG(i));
 
-   mv_cesa_adjust_op(engine, >op_tmpl);
-   memcpy_toio(engine->sram, >op_tmpl, sizeof(creq->op_tmpl));
-
if (creq->cache_ptr)
memcpy_toio(engine->sram + CESA_SA_DATA_SRAM_OFFSET,
creq->cache, creq->cache_ptr);
-- 
2.9.3

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-crypto" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html