[PATCH 1/8] crypto: talitos - ensure request ordering within a single tfm

2011-07-08 Thread Kim Phillips
Assign single target channel per tfm in talitos_cra_init instead of
performing channel scheduling dynamically during the encryption request.
This changes the talitos_submit interface to accept a new channel
number argument.  Without this, rapid bursts of misc. sized requests
could make it possible for IPsec packets to be encrypted out-of-order,
which would result in packet drops due to sequence numbers falling
outside the anti-reply window on a peer gateway.

Signed-off-by: Kim Phillips 
---
 drivers/crypto/talitos.c |   23 ++-
 1 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/crypto/talitos.c b/drivers/crypto/talitos.c
index 854e263..b8ca583 100644
--- a/drivers/crypto/talitos.c
+++ b/drivers/crypto/talitos.c
@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
 /*
  * talitos - Freescale Integrated Security Engine (SEC) device driver
  *
- * Copyright (c) 2008-2010 Freescale Semiconductor, Inc.
+ * Copyright (c) 2008-2011 Freescale Semiconductor, Inc.
  *
  * Scatterlist Crypto API glue code copied from files with the following:
  * Copyright (c) 2006-2007 Herbert Xu 
@@ -282,6 +282,7 @@ static int init_device(struct device *dev)
 /**
  * talitos_submit - submits a descriptor to the device for processing
  * @dev:   the SEC device to be used
+ * @ch:the SEC device channel to be used
  * @desc:  the descriptor to be processed by the device
  * @callback:  whom to call when processing is complete
  * @context:   a handle for use by caller (optional)
@@ -290,7 +291,7 @@ static int init_device(struct device *dev)
  * callback must check err and feedback in descriptor header
  * for device processing status.
  */
-static int talitos_submit(struct device *dev, struct talitos_desc *desc,
+static int talitos_submit(struct device *dev, int ch, struct talitos_desc 
*desc,
  void (*callback)(struct device *dev,
   struct talitos_desc *desc,
   void *context, int error),
@@ -298,15 +299,12 @@ static int talitos_submit(struct device *dev, struct 
talitos_desc *desc,
 {
struct talitos_private *priv = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
struct talitos_request *request;
-   unsigned long flags, ch;
+   unsigned long flags;
int head;
 
/* select done notification */
desc->hdr |= DESC_HDR_DONE_NOTIFY;
 
-   /* emulate SEC's round-robin channel fifo polling scheme */
-   ch = atomic_inc_return(&priv->last_chan) & (priv->num_channels - 1);
-
spin_lock_irqsave(&priv->chan[ch].head_lock, flags);
 
if (!atomic_inc_not_zero(&priv->chan[ch].submit_count)) {
@@ -706,6 +704,7 @@ static void talitos_unregister_rng(struct device *dev)
 
 struct talitos_ctx {
struct device *dev;
+   int ch;
__be32 desc_hdr_template;
u8 key[TALITOS_MAX_KEY_SIZE];
u8 iv[TALITOS_MAX_IV_LENGTH];
@@ -1117,7 +1116,7 @@ static int ipsec_esp(struct talitos_edesc *edesc, struct 
aead_request *areq,
map_single_talitos_ptr(dev, &desc->ptr[6], ivsize, ctx->iv, 0,
   DMA_FROM_DEVICE);
 
-   ret = talitos_submit(dev, desc, callback, areq);
+   ret = talitos_submit(dev, ctx->ch, desc, callback, areq);
if (ret != -EINPROGRESS) {
ipsec_esp_unmap(dev, edesc, areq);
kfree(edesc);
@@ -1524,7 +1523,7 @@ static int common_nonsnoop(struct talitos_edesc *edesc,
to_talitos_ptr(&desc->ptr[6], 0);
desc->ptr[6].j_extent = 0;
 
-   ret = talitos_submit(dev, desc, callback, areq);
+   ret = talitos_submit(dev, ctx->ch, desc, callback, areq);
if (ret != -EINPROGRESS) {
common_nonsnoop_unmap(dev, edesc, areq);
kfree(edesc);
@@ -1703,7 +1702,7 @@ static int common_nonsnoop_hash(struct talitos_edesc 
*edesc,
/* last DWORD empty */
desc->ptr[6] = zero_entry;
 
-   ret = talitos_submit(dev, desc, callback, areq);
+   ret = talitos_submit(dev, ctx->ch, desc, callback, areq);
if (ret != -EINPROGRESS) {
common_nonsnoop_hash_unmap(dev, edesc, areq);
kfree(edesc);
@@ -2244,6 +2243,7 @@ static int talitos_cra_init(struct crypto_tfm *tfm)
struct crypto_alg *alg = tfm->__crt_alg;
struct talitos_crypto_alg *talitos_alg;
struct talitos_ctx *ctx = crypto_tfm_ctx(tfm);
+   struct talitos_private *priv;
 
if ((alg->cra_flags & CRYPTO_ALG_TYPE_MASK) == CRYPTO_ALG_TYPE_AHASH)
talitos_alg = container_of(__crypto_ahash_alg(alg),
@@ -2256,6 +2256,11 @@ static int talitos_cra_init(struct crypto_tfm *tfm)
/* update context with ptr to dev */
ctx->dev = talitos_alg->dev;
 
+   /* assign SEC channel to tfm in round-robin fashion */
+   priv = dev_get_drvdata(ctx->dev);
+   ctx->ch = atomic_inc_return(&priv->last_chan) &
+ (priv->num_channels - 1);
+
/* copy descriptor heade

Re: [PATCH 1/8] crypto: talitos - ensure request ordering within a single tfm

2011-07-14 Thread Herbert Xu
On Fri, Jul 08, 2011 at 10:57:22PM +, Kim Phillips wrote:
> Assign single target channel per tfm in talitos_cra_init instead of
> performing channel scheduling dynamically during the encryption request.
> This changes the talitos_submit interface to accept a new channel
> number argument.  Without this, rapid bursts of misc. sized requests
> could make it possible for IPsec packets to be encrypted out-of-order,
> which would result in packet drops due to sequence numbers falling
> outside the anti-reply window on a peer gateway.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Kim Phillips 

All patches applied.  Thanks!
-- 
Email: Herbert Xu 
Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/
PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-crypto" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html