Re: [linux-dvb] NDAs - ANY KNOWN RULES?
Am Dienstag, den 26.06.2007, 19:37 -0700 schrieb Arjan van de Ven: > > Thanks for your explanations, > > > > but I know for sure it does't work. > > then.. do you have an actual question or are you just trying to troll? > > and yes there have been several such trolls lately on this list, and so > far your postings have all the signs of being just another one.. > > > DO NOT FEED THE TROLLS > > Hello, thanks ;), you might help me to decide if somebody abuses a list already for free advertising or is still contributing. http://marc.info/?l=linux-video&m=118289479416612&w=2 Sorry, my question is, where one can look up if the pinning of a newer chip we support is also only under NDA available. Previously often at least that was public. (examples now saa7131e, tda10046a, tda8275ac1) If I don't find anything on the web, whom I have to ask that question, the NDA holder, the manufacturer or do we have a list, because everybody knows that this can be helpful to identify hardware differences and this question is always asked already? Thanks, Hermann ___ linux-dvb mailing list linux-dvb@linuxtv.org http://www.linuxtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/linux-dvb
Re: [linux-dvb] NDAs - ANY KNOWN RULES?
Am Dienstag, den 26.06.2007, 20:24 -0400 schrieb Daniel Barkalow: > On Wed, 27 Jun 2007, hermann pitton wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > such stuff causes a lot of troubles since long. > > > > Are there any rules, or can everybody go on as some sort of freelancer > > exclusively on such? I don't like it! > > http://www.linux-foundation.org/en/NDA_program > > In short, the Linux Foundation can negotiate a reasonable NDA for you to > sign, and they may be able to show you relevant documents as a freelancer > under a reasonable and standardized contract. > > -Daniel > *This .sig left intentionally blank* Thanks for your explanations, but I know for sure it does't work. Cheers, Hermann ___ linux-dvb mailing list linux-dvb@linuxtv.org http://www.linuxtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/linux-dvb
Re: [linux-dvb] NDAs - ANY KNOWN RULES?
Generally companies dislike dealing with 'nobodys' with @gmail addresses and especially if Lunix is mentioned. But if you have a reasonable hw company and products that fit the general category for which you're getting NDA information for, then there's no problem. -tc On 6/27/07, hermann pitton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hi, > > such stuff causes a lot of troubles since long. > > Are there any rules, or can everybody go on as some sort of freelancer > exclusively on such? I don't like it! > > Cheers, > Hermann > > > > ___ > linux-dvb mailing list > linux-dvb@linuxtv.org > http://www.linuxtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/linux-dvb > ___ linux-dvb mailing list linux-dvb@linuxtv.org http://www.linuxtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/linux-dvb
[linux-dvb] NDAs - ANY KNOWN RULES?
Hi, such stuff causes a lot of troubles since long. Are there any rules, or can everybody go on as some sort of freelancer exclusively on such? I don't like it! Cheers, Hermann ___ linux-dvb mailing list linux-dvb@linuxtv.org http://www.linuxtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/linux-dvb
