[linux-dvb] Re: support diseqc-2.0 switches
Hi, i guess that you receive the "operation not supported" from the FE driver and not from andy DiSEqC Equipment you may use :) As Andrew told you already the STV0229B Frontend isn't able to react on a DiSEqC reply. It it the same reason like always - there is backwards compatiblity and manufacturing FE without these or other capabilities is cheaper. So why should somebody implement DiSEqC 2.0 functionallity into the FE Hardware - if you also can use the Switches with the 1.0 commands. Greetings mws > Hi, > > I just spent a couple hours writing a program to handle diseqc parsing. > > I successfully sent the diseqc command (or I believe I did) and then set > > struct dvb_diseqc_slave_reply rep; > memset(&rep, 0, sizeof(rep); > rep.timeout = 100; > ioctl(fd, FE_DISEQC_SLAVE_REPLY, &rep); > > I got > > operation not supported > > that's right, isn't it? I've got the stv0299 demodulator like you say. > > _J > > In the new year, Robert Schlabbach wrote: > > From: "Andrew de Quincey" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > The hardware and APIs should already support it - > > > > Huh? AFAIK, the STV0229B has no means to receive any DiSEqC responses, and > > since that demodulator is used on most current cards, I'd say the hardware > > does NOT support it. > > > > Do you know of any DVB-S demodulator which supports bidirectional DiSEqC > > commands, and that is already used on receiver cards for PCs? > > > > Regards,« > > -- > > Robert Schlabbach > > e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Berlin, Germany > > > > > > > > > > -- > > Info: > > To unsubscribe send a mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe linux-dvb" as > > subject. > > > > > -- Info: To unsubscribe send a mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe linux-dvb" as subject.
[linux-dvb] Re: support diseqc-2.0 switches
Hi, I just spent a couple hours writing a program to handle diseqc parsing. I successfully sent the diseqc command (or I believe I did) and then set struct dvb_diseqc_slave_reply rep; memset(&rep, 0, sizeof(rep); rep.timeout = 100; ioctl(fd, FE_DISEQC_SLAVE_REPLY, &rep); I got operation not supported that's right, isn't it? I've got the stv0299 demodulator like you say. _J In the new year, Robert Schlabbach wrote: > From: "Andrew de Quincey" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > The hardware and APIs should already support it - > > Huh? AFAIK, the STV0229B has no means to receive any DiSEqC responses, and > since that demodulator is used on most current cards, I'd say the hardware > does NOT support it. > > Do you know of any DVB-S demodulator which supports bidirectional DiSEqC > commands, and that is already used on receiver cards for PCs? > > Regards,« > -- > Robert Schlabbach > e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Berlin, Germany > > > > > -- > Info: > To unsubscribe send a mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe linux-dvb" as > subject. > -- Info: To unsubscribe send a mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe linux-dvb" as subject.
[linux-dvb] Re: support diseqc-2.0 switches
From: "Andrew de Quincey" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > The hardware and APIs should already support it - Huh? AFAIK, the STV0229B has no means to receive any DiSEqC responses, and since that demodulator is used on most current cards, I'd say the hardware does NOT support it. Do you know of any DVB-S demodulator which supports bidirectional DiSEqC commands, and that is already used on receiver cards for PCs? Regards,« -- Robert Schlabbach e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Berlin, Germany -- Info: To unsubscribe send a mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe linux-dvb" as subject.
[linux-dvb] Re: support diseqc-2.0 switches
On Wednesday 12 May 2004 01:25, you wrote: > Hello, > > What is the thought for supporting diseqc-2.0? What needs to be supported > in hardware? software? The hardware and APIs should already support it - its a matter of coding it in userspace software, or using one of the apps which support it (VDR maybe?) Grab the standard from eutelsat - it maps on the API pretty directly. -- Info: To unsubscribe send a mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe linux-dvb" as subject.