Re: New MMC maintainer needed
Matt Fleming wrote: Is the 3.00 spec publicly available? There does not appear to be a simplified version of the 3.00 specification. David -- David Vrabel, Senior Software Engineer, Drivers CSR, Churchill House, Cambridge Business Park, Tel: +44 (0)1223 692562 Cowley Road, Cambridge, CB4 0WZ http://www.csr.com/ 'member of the CSR plc group of companies. CSR plc registered in England and Wales, registered number 4187346, registered office Churchill House, Cambridge Business Park, Cowley Road, Cambridge, CB4 0WZ, United Kingdom' -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-embedded in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Re: New MMC maintainer needed
On Wed, 22 Jul 2009 15:17:44 -0700 Andrew Morton a...@linux-foundation.org wrote: Thanks, Pierre. Until and unless someone else steps up I can act as maintainer of last resort for MMC. As I'm presently doing for fbdev, hwmon, rtc, spi, gpio, i2o and about 1000 other identifiable subsystems. I'm not falling of the face of the earth here, so people can still cc me on MMC patches, although I probably cannot answer all of them. I don't want to be the bottle neck that keeps MMC patches and discussions moving at a glacial speed, which is the situation we're in today. Fortunately, MMC doesn't appear to have its own mailing list so I'll actually get to see the patches. I do monitor a couple of subsystem-specific lists (fbdev, hwmon) but the delays can be awful - a month or two. MMC discussions tend to often be very system specific, which makes lists such as the arm kernel list more appropriate. Also, I've always tried to steer people to LKML as it allows others to keep a casual eye on things. Rgds -- -- Pierre Ossman WARNING: This correspondence is being monitored by the Swedish government. Make sure your server uses encryption for SMTP traffic and consider using PGP for end-to-end encryption. signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Re: New MMC maintainer needed
On Thu, 23 Jul 2009 01:08:08 +0100 Ian Molton i...@mnementh.co.uk wrote: Pierre - do you have a bunch of MMC spec-type docs around? I've lost all but the few sparse datasheets for TMIO that I had, so some docs covering protocol / commands would be useful. Any references / downloads that you know of? I use the public specs from sdcard.org for more or less everything. I also have a MMC 4 spec, which was generously donated to me by Nokia. Unfortunately I am not allowed to pass that on. I can look things up for people if they have specific questions though. Rgds -- -- Pierre Ossman WARNING: This correspondence is being monitored by the Swedish government. Make sure your server uses encryption for SMTP traffic and consider using PGP for end-to-end encryption. signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Re: New MMC maintainer needed
I'll try to compose a list of outstanding discussions and patches so that people know what needs attention. I'll try to get that done in the next few days. Rgds -- -- Pierre Ossman WARNING: This correspondence is being monitored by the Swedish government. Make sure your server uses encryption for SMTP traffic and consider using PGP for end-to-end encryption. signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Re: New MMC maintainer needed
Pierre Ossman wrote: MMC discussions tend to often be very system specific, which makes lists such as the arm kernel list more appropriate. Also, I've always tried to steer people to LKML as it allows others to keep a casual eye on things. I think an MMC list wouldnt be a bad idea now that we have a sort of 'distributed maintainership' thing going on... itd help get people up to speed... -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-embedded in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
