Re: - disable-ext4.patch removed from -mm tree

[David Howells]

Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> Last time I discussed this with David he seemed to find this amusing rather
> than an urgent problem.

Amusing?  In what way?

I've been at LCA, and I left all but one of my machines powered down because
the local substation broke and has been giving wildly variable voltages, if at
all.  I've had to replace two PSUs because of this.  That's made it hard to
test stuff remotely.  If you wish to view this as amusing, then by all means
do so.

David
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Re: [patch 3/8] 64-bit i_version: afs fixes

[David Howells]

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

> - _leave(" = 0 { vn=%u u=%u } -> { ino=%lu v=%lu }",
> + _leave(" = 0 { vn=%u u=%u } -> { ino=%lu v=%llu }",
>  fid.vnode,
>  fid.unique,
>  dentry->d_inode->i_ino,
> -dentry->d_inode->i_version);
> +(unsigned long long)dentry->d_inode->i_version);

Hmmm...  In AFS's case this is overkill...  The value contained in i_version
is going to be a 32-bit number because that's all the protocol supports.

David
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html