[PATCH] process orphan list if device transitions to readonly

2006-12-12 Thread Eric Sandeen
I have a patch in -mm now to skip orphan inode processing on a read-only
device (where IO may fail if issued), but Stephen points out that if
the device ever transitions back to readwrite, and the filesystem is
remounted as rewrite, we should process the orphan inode list at that point.

Today, I'm not sure how we can easily get into this situation - for example,
lvm apparently cannot transform a RO snapshot into RW.  But it is at least
possible to do this.  For example I tested by:

create orphan list
crash
mark block device RO via BLKROSET
mount fs RO
mark block device RW via BLKROSET
remount fs RW

so it's within the realm of possibility, certainly.

here's what I came up with; I'm not very pleased with it though, but I need
some way to let ext3_orphan_del know that the sb is already locked and it's
safe to do this orphan processing w/o re-taking it, so I added a state flag...
It's worked in my testing.  Comments or commit would be appreciated.

Thanks,

-Eric

Signed-off-by: Eric Sandeen [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Index: linux-2.6.19/fs/ext3/namei.c
===
--- linux-2.6.19.orig/fs/ext3/namei.c
+++ linux-2.6.19/fs/ext3/namei.c
@@ -1942,15 +1942,15 @@ int ext3_orphan_del(handle_t *handle, st
struct ext3_iloc iloc;
int err = 0;
 
-   lock_super(inode-i_sb);
-   if (list_empty(ei-i_orphan)) {
-   unlock_super(inode-i_sb);
-   return 0;
-   }
+   sbi = EXT3_SB(inode-i_sb);
+   if (!(sbi-s_mount_state  EXT3_REMOUNTING_FS))
+   lock_super(inode-i_sb);
+
+   if (list_empty(ei-i_orphan))
+   goto out;
 
ino_next = NEXT_ORPHAN(inode);
prev = ei-i_orphan.prev;
-   sbi = EXT3_SB(inode-i_sb);
 
jbd_debug(4, remove inode %lu from orphan list\n, inode-i_ino);
 
@@ -1996,7 +1996,8 @@ int ext3_orphan_del(handle_t *handle, st
 out_err:
ext3_std_error(inode-i_sb, err);
 out:
-   unlock_super(inode-i_sb);
+   if (!(sbi-s_mount_state  EXT3_REMOUNTING_FS))
+   unlock_super(inode-i_sb);
return err;
 
 out_brelse:
Index: linux-2.6.19/fs/ext3/super.c
===
--- linux-2.6.19.orig/fs/ext3/super.c
+++ linux-2.6.19/fs/ext3/super.c
@@ -2358,6 +2358,10 @@ static int ext3_remount (struct super_bl
goto restore_opts;
if (!ext3_setup_super (sb, es, 0))
sb-s_flags = ~MS_RDONLY;
+   EXT3_SB(sb)-s_mount_state |= 
(EXT3_ORPHAN_FS|EXT3_REMOUNTING_FS);
+   ext3_orphan_cleanup(sb, es);
+   EXT3_SB(sb)-s_mount_state = 
~(EXT3_ORPHAN_FS|EXT3_REMOUNTING_FS);
+
}
}
 #ifdef CONFIG_QUOTA
Index: linux-2.6.19/include/linux/ext3_fs.h
===
--- linux-2.6.19.orig/include/linux/ext3_fs.h
+++ linux-2.6.19/include/linux/ext3_fs.h
@@ -356,6 +356,7 @@ struct ext3_inode {
 #defineEXT3_VALID_FS   0x0001  /* Unmounted cleanly */
 #defineEXT3_ERROR_FS   0x0002  /* Errors detected */
 #defineEXT3_ORPHAN_FS  0x0004  /* Orphans being 
recovered */
+#defineEXT3_REMOUNTING_FS  0x0008  /* Filesystem 
remounting, sb locked */
 
 /*
  * Mount flags


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-ext4 in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[RFC][PATCH] process orphan list if device transitions to readonly

2006-12-06 Thread Eric Sandeen
I have a patch in -mm now to skip orphan inode processing on a read-only
device (where IO may fail if issued), but Stephen points out that if
the device ever transitions back to readwrite, and the filesystem is
remounted as rewrite, we should process the orphan inode list at that point.

Today, I'm not sure how we can easily get into this situation - for example,
lvm apparently cannot transform a RO snapshot into RW.  But it is at least
possible to do this.  For example I tested by:

create orphan list
crash
mark block device RO via BLKROSET
mount fs RO
mark block device RW via BLKROSET
remount fs RW

so it's within the realm of possibility, certainly.

here's what I came up with; I'm not very pleased with it though, but I need
some way to let ext3_orphan_del know that the sb is already locked and it's
safe to do this orphan processing w/o re-taking it, so I added a state flag...

Comments?

Thanks,

-Eric

Signed-off-by: Eric Sandeen [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Index: linux-2.6.19/fs/ext3/namei.c
===
--- linux-2.6.19.orig/fs/ext3/namei.c
+++ linux-2.6.19/fs/ext3/namei.c
@@ -1942,15 +1942,15 @@ int ext3_orphan_del(handle_t *handle, st
struct ext3_iloc iloc;
int err = 0;
 
-   lock_super(inode-i_sb);
-   if (list_empty(ei-i_orphan)) {
-   unlock_super(inode-i_sb);
-   return 0;
-   }
+   sbi = EXT3_SB(inode-i_sb);
+   if (!(sbi-s_mount_state  EXT3_REMOUNTING_FS))
+   lock_super(inode-i_sb);
+
+   if (list_empty(ei-i_orphan))
+   goto out;
 
ino_next = NEXT_ORPHAN(inode);
prev = ei-i_orphan.prev;
-   sbi = EXT3_SB(inode-i_sb);
 
jbd_debug(4, remove inode %lu from orphan list\n, inode-i_ino);
 
@@ -1996,7 +1996,8 @@ int ext3_orphan_del(handle_t *handle, st
 out_err:
ext3_std_error(inode-i_sb, err);
 out:
-   unlock_super(inode-i_sb);
+   if (!(sbi-s_mount_state  EXT3_REMOUNTING_FS))
+   unlock_super(inode-i_sb);
return err;
 
 out_brelse:
Index: linux-2.6.19/fs/ext3/super.c
===
--- linux-2.6.19.orig/fs/ext3/super.c
+++ linux-2.6.19/fs/ext3/super.c
@@ -2358,6 +2358,10 @@ static int ext3_remount (struct super_bl
goto restore_opts;
if (!ext3_setup_super (sb, es, 0))
sb-s_flags = ~MS_RDONLY;
+   EXT3_SB(sb)-s_mount_state |= 
(EXT3_ORPHAN_FS|EXT3_REMOUNTING_FS);
+   ext3_orphan_cleanup(sb, es);
+   EXT3_SB(sb)-s_mount_state = 
~(EXT3_ORPHAN_FS|EXT3_REMOUNTING_FS);
+
}
}
 #ifdef CONFIG_QUOTA
Index: linux-2.6.19/include/linux/ext3_fs.h
===
--- linux-2.6.19.orig/include/linux/ext3_fs.h
+++ linux-2.6.19/include/linux/ext3_fs.h
@@ -356,6 +356,7 @@ struct ext3_inode {
 #defineEXT3_VALID_FS   0x0001  /* Unmounted cleanly */
 #defineEXT3_ERROR_FS   0x0002  /* Errors detected */
 #defineEXT3_ORPHAN_FS  0x0004  /* Orphans being 
recovered */
+#defineEXT3_REMOUNTING_FS  0x0008  /* Filesystem 
remounting, sb locked */
 
 /*
  * Mount flags


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-ext4 in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html