On Sun, 2006-10-22 at 16:50 +0800, guomingyang wrote:
>
>I also find many places where the block number type is not changed in
> namei.c and dir.c. Why?
They are all file logical blocks, ext4_fsblk_t is for on disk blocks.
Takashi Sato has a patch to define all file logical blocks as
ext3_fileblk_t, it did not make to mainline before ext4 was forked.
Probably we should bring the to ext3/4 to clarify the confusions.
Mingming
>Thank you to anyone who offer help
> >Hello everyone:
> >
> > I am a student interesting in linux filesystem, I have a
> > problem about the replace of block number type to ext4_fsblk_t. Is it
> > complete? Or has it passed all the test? Because I have found a place like
> > this in linux-2.6.19-rc2/fs/ext4/inode.c
> >
> >
> >
> >+struct buffer_head *ext4_bread(handle_t *handle, struct inode *inode,
> >+ int block, int create, int *err)
> >
> >
> >the block's type is not changed. Although I think it will bring no mistake,
> >I doubt about why not change it. Thank you !
> >
> >
> >guomingyang
> >
> >-
> >To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
> >the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>
> guomingyang
>
> -
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
> the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
