[f2fs-dev] [PATCH 09/14] xfs: Convert double locking of MMAPLOCK to use VFS helpers
Convert places in XFS that take MMAPLOCK for two inodes to use helper
VFS provides for it (filemap_invalidate_down_write_two()). Note that
this changes lock ordering for MMAPLOCK from inode number based ordering
to pointer based ordering VFS generally uses.
CC: "Darrick J. Wong"
Reviewed-by: Darrick J. Wong
Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig
Signed-off-by: Jan Kara
---
fs/xfs/xfs_bmap_util.c | 15 ---
fs/xfs/xfs_inode.c | 37 +++--
2 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 33 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_bmap_util.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_bmap_util.c
index 213a97a921bb..1cd3f940fa6a 100644
--- a/fs/xfs/xfs_bmap_util.c
+++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_bmap_util.c
@@ -1626,7 +1626,6 @@ xfs_swap_extents(
struct xfs_bstat*sbp = &sxp->sx_stat;
int src_log_flags, target_log_flags;
int error = 0;
- int lock_flags;
uint64_tf;
int resblks = 0;
unsigned intflags = 0;
@@ -1638,8 +1637,8 @@ xfs_swap_extents(
* do the rest of the checks.
*/
lock_two_nondirectories(VFS_I(ip), VFS_I(tip));
- lock_flags = XFS_MMAPLOCK_EXCL;
- xfs_lock_two_inodes(ip, XFS_MMAPLOCK_EXCL, tip, XFS_MMAPLOCK_EXCL);
+ filemap_invalidate_lock_two(VFS_I(ip)->i_mapping,
+ VFS_I(tip)->i_mapping);
/* Verify that both files have the same format */
if ((VFS_I(ip)->i_mode & S_IFMT) != (VFS_I(tip)->i_mode & S_IFMT)) {
@@ -1711,7 +1710,6 @@ xfs_swap_extents(
* or cancel will unlock the inodes from this point onwards.
*/
xfs_lock_two_inodes(ip, XFS_ILOCK_EXCL, tip, XFS_ILOCK_EXCL);
- lock_flags |= XFS_ILOCK_EXCL;
xfs_trans_ijoin(tp, ip, 0);
xfs_trans_ijoin(tp, tip, 0);
@@ -1830,13 +1828,16 @@ xfs_swap_extents(
trace_xfs_swap_extent_after(ip, 0);
trace_xfs_swap_extent_after(tip, 1);
+out_unlock_ilock:
+ xfs_iunlock(ip, XFS_ILOCK_EXCL);
+ xfs_iunlock(tip, XFS_ILOCK_EXCL);
out_unlock:
- xfs_iunlock(ip, lock_flags);
- xfs_iunlock(tip, lock_flags);
+ filemap_invalidate_unlock_two(VFS_I(ip)->i_mapping,
+ VFS_I(tip)->i_mapping);
unlock_two_nondirectories(VFS_I(ip), VFS_I(tip));
return error;
out_trans_cancel:
xfs_trans_cancel(tp);
- goto out_unlock;
+ goto out_unlock_ilock;
}
diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_inode.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_inode.c
index d6a8ac76b45d..3c0bb21453dc 100644
--- a/fs/xfs/xfs_inode.c
+++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_inode.c
@@ -552,12 +552,10 @@ xfs_lock_inodes(
}
/*
- * xfs_lock_two_inodes() can only be used to lock one type of lock at a time -
- * the mmaplock or the ilock, but not more than one type at a time. If we lock
- * more than one at a time, lockdep will report false positives saying we have
- * violated locking orders. The iolock must be double-locked separately since
- * we use i_rwsem for that. We now support taking one lock EXCL and the other
- * SHARED.
+ * xfs_lock_two_inodes() can only be used to lock ilock. The iolock and
+ * mmaplock must be double-locked separately since we use i_rwsem and
+ * invalidate_lock for that. We now support taking one lock EXCL and the
+ * other SHARED.
*/
void
xfs_lock_two_inodes(
@@ -575,15 +573,8 @@ xfs_lock_two_inodes(
ASSERT(hweight32(ip1_mode) == 1);
ASSERT(!(ip0_mode & (XFS_IOLOCK_SHARED|XFS_IOLOCK_EXCL)));
ASSERT(!(ip1_mode & (XFS_IOLOCK_SHARED|XFS_IOLOCK_EXCL)));
- ASSERT(!(ip0_mode & (XFS_MMAPLOCK_SHARED|XFS_MMAPLOCK_EXCL)) ||
- !(ip0_mode & (XFS_ILOCK_SHARED|XFS_ILOCK_EXCL)));
- ASSERT(!(ip1_mode & (XFS_MMAPLOCK_SHARED|XFS_MMAPLOCK_EXCL)) ||
- !(ip1_mode & (XFS_ILOCK_SHARED|XFS_ILOCK_EXCL)));
- ASSERT(!(ip1_mode & (XFS_MMAPLOCK_SHARED|XFS_MMAPLOCK_EXCL)) ||
- !(ip0_mode & (XFS_ILOCK_SHARED|XFS_ILOCK_EXCL)));
- ASSERT(!(ip0_mode & (XFS_MMAPLOCK_SHARED|XFS_MMAPLOCK_EXCL)) ||
- !(ip1_mode & (XFS_ILOCK_SHARED|XFS_ILOCK_EXCL)));
-
+ ASSERT(!(ip0_mode & (XFS_MMAPLOCK_SHARED|XFS_MMAPLOCK_EXCL)));
+ ASSERT(!(ip1_mode & (XFS_MMAPLOCK_SHARED|XFS_MMAPLOCK_EXCL)));
ASSERT(ip0->i_ino != ip1->i_ino);
if (ip0->i_ino > ip1->i_ino) {
@@ -3748,11 +3739,8 @@ xfs_ilock2_io_mmap(
ret = xfs_iolock_two_inodes_and_break_layout(VFS_I(ip1), VFS_I(ip2));
if (ret)
return ret;
- if (ip1 == ip2)
- xfs_ilock(ip1, XFS_MMAPLOCK_EXCL);
- else
- xfs_lock_two_inodes(ip1, XFS_MMAPLOCK_EXCL,
- ip2, XFS_MMAPLOCK_EXCL);
+ filemap_invalidate_lock_two(VFS_I(ip1)->i_mapping,
+ VFS_I(ip2)->i_mapping);
return 0;
}
@@ -3762,12 +3750,9 @@ xfs_iunlock2_io_mmap(
struct xfs_inode*ip1,
stru
[f2fs-dev] [PATCH 09/14] xfs: Convert double locking of MMAPLOCK to use VFS helpers
Convert places in XFS that take MMAPLOCK for two inodes to use helper
VFS provides for it (filemap_invalidate_down_write_two()). Note that
this changes lock ordering for MMAPLOCK from inode number based ordering
to pointer based ordering VFS generally uses.
CC: "Darrick J. Wong"
Reviewed-by: Darrick J. Wong
Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig
Signed-off-by: Jan Kara
---
fs/xfs/xfs_bmap_util.c | 15 ---
fs/xfs/xfs_inode.c | 37 +++--
2 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 33 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_bmap_util.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_bmap_util.c
index 213a97a921bb..1cd3f940fa6a 100644
--- a/fs/xfs/xfs_bmap_util.c
+++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_bmap_util.c
@@ -1626,7 +1626,6 @@ xfs_swap_extents(
struct xfs_bstat*sbp = &sxp->sx_stat;
int src_log_flags, target_log_flags;
int error = 0;
- int lock_flags;
uint64_tf;
int resblks = 0;
unsigned intflags = 0;
@@ -1638,8 +1637,8 @@ xfs_swap_extents(
* do the rest of the checks.
*/
lock_two_nondirectories(VFS_I(ip), VFS_I(tip));
- lock_flags = XFS_MMAPLOCK_EXCL;
- xfs_lock_two_inodes(ip, XFS_MMAPLOCK_EXCL, tip, XFS_MMAPLOCK_EXCL);
+ filemap_invalidate_lock_two(VFS_I(ip)->i_mapping,
+ VFS_I(tip)->i_mapping);
/* Verify that both files have the same format */
if ((VFS_I(ip)->i_mode & S_IFMT) != (VFS_I(tip)->i_mode & S_IFMT)) {
@@ -1711,7 +1710,6 @@ xfs_swap_extents(
* or cancel will unlock the inodes from this point onwards.
*/
xfs_lock_two_inodes(ip, XFS_ILOCK_EXCL, tip, XFS_ILOCK_EXCL);
- lock_flags |= XFS_ILOCK_EXCL;
xfs_trans_ijoin(tp, ip, 0);
xfs_trans_ijoin(tp, tip, 0);
@@ -1830,13 +1828,16 @@ xfs_swap_extents(
trace_xfs_swap_extent_after(ip, 0);
trace_xfs_swap_extent_after(tip, 1);
+out_unlock_ilock:
+ xfs_iunlock(ip, XFS_ILOCK_EXCL);
+ xfs_iunlock(tip, XFS_ILOCK_EXCL);
out_unlock:
- xfs_iunlock(ip, lock_flags);
- xfs_iunlock(tip, lock_flags);
+ filemap_invalidate_unlock_two(VFS_I(ip)->i_mapping,
+ VFS_I(tip)->i_mapping);
unlock_two_nondirectories(VFS_I(ip), VFS_I(tip));
return error;
out_trans_cancel:
xfs_trans_cancel(tp);
- goto out_unlock;
+ goto out_unlock_ilock;
}
diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_inode.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_inode.c
index d6a8ac76b45d..3c0bb21453dc 100644
--- a/fs/xfs/xfs_inode.c
+++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_inode.c
@@ -552,12 +552,10 @@ xfs_lock_inodes(
}
/*
- * xfs_lock_two_inodes() can only be used to lock one type of lock at a time -
- * the mmaplock or the ilock, but not more than one type at a time. If we lock
- * more than one at a time, lockdep will report false positives saying we have
- * violated locking orders. The iolock must be double-locked separately since
- * we use i_rwsem for that. We now support taking one lock EXCL and the other
- * SHARED.
+ * xfs_lock_two_inodes() can only be used to lock ilock. The iolock and
+ * mmaplock must be double-locked separately since we use i_rwsem and
+ * invalidate_lock for that. We now support taking one lock EXCL and the
+ * other SHARED.
*/
void
xfs_lock_two_inodes(
@@ -575,15 +573,8 @@ xfs_lock_two_inodes(
ASSERT(hweight32(ip1_mode) == 1);
ASSERT(!(ip0_mode & (XFS_IOLOCK_SHARED|XFS_IOLOCK_EXCL)));
ASSERT(!(ip1_mode & (XFS_IOLOCK_SHARED|XFS_IOLOCK_EXCL)));
- ASSERT(!(ip0_mode & (XFS_MMAPLOCK_SHARED|XFS_MMAPLOCK_EXCL)) ||
- !(ip0_mode & (XFS_ILOCK_SHARED|XFS_ILOCK_EXCL)));
- ASSERT(!(ip1_mode & (XFS_MMAPLOCK_SHARED|XFS_MMAPLOCK_EXCL)) ||
- !(ip1_mode & (XFS_ILOCK_SHARED|XFS_ILOCK_EXCL)));
- ASSERT(!(ip1_mode & (XFS_MMAPLOCK_SHARED|XFS_MMAPLOCK_EXCL)) ||
- !(ip0_mode & (XFS_ILOCK_SHARED|XFS_ILOCK_EXCL)));
- ASSERT(!(ip0_mode & (XFS_MMAPLOCK_SHARED|XFS_MMAPLOCK_EXCL)) ||
- !(ip1_mode & (XFS_ILOCK_SHARED|XFS_ILOCK_EXCL)));
-
+ ASSERT(!(ip0_mode & (XFS_MMAPLOCK_SHARED|XFS_MMAPLOCK_EXCL)));
+ ASSERT(!(ip1_mode & (XFS_MMAPLOCK_SHARED|XFS_MMAPLOCK_EXCL)));
ASSERT(ip0->i_ino != ip1->i_ino);
if (ip0->i_ino > ip1->i_ino) {
@@ -3748,11 +3739,8 @@ xfs_ilock2_io_mmap(
ret = xfs_iolock_two_inodes_and_break_layout(VFS_I(ip1), VFS_I(ip2));
if (ret)
return ret;
- if (ip1 == ip2)
- xfs_ilock(ip1, XFS_MMAPLOCK_EXCL);
- else
- xfs_lock_two_inodes(ip1, XFS_MMAPLOCK_EXCL,
- ip2, XFS_MMAPLOCK_EXCL);
+ filemap_invalidate_lock_two(VFS_I(ip1)->i_mapping,
+ VFS_I(ip2)->i_mapping);
return 0;
}
@@ -3762,12 +3750,9 @@ xfs_iunlock2_io_mmap(
struct xfs_inode*ip1,
stru
Re: [f2fs-dev] [PATCH 09/14] xfs: Convert double locking of MMAPLOCK to use VFS helpers
On Tue, Jun 15, 2021 at 11:17:59AM +0200, Jan Kara wrote: > Convert places in XFS that take MMAPLOCK for two inodes to use helper > VFS provides for it (filemap_invalidate_down_write_two()). Note that > this changes lock ordering for MMAPLOCK from inode number based ordering > to pointer based ordering VFS generally uses. Looks good, Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig ___ Linux-f2fs-devel mailing list Linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-f2fs-devel
[f2fs-dev] [PATCH 09/14] xfs: Convert double locking of MMAPLOCK to use VFS helpers
Convert places in XFS that take MMAPLOCK for two inodes to use helper
VFS provides for it (filemap_invalidate_down_write_two()). Note that
this changes lock ordering for MMAPLOCK from inode number based ordering
to pointer based ordering VFS generally uses.
CC: "Darrick J. Wong"
Reviewed-by: Darrick J. Wong
Signed-off-by: Jan Kara
---
fs/xfs/xfs_bmap_util.c | 15 ---
fs/xfs/xfs_inode.c | 37 +++--
2 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 33 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_bmap_util.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_bmap_util.c
index 0936f3a96fe6..ef18269ad1f7 100644
--- a/fs/xfs/xfs_bmap_util.c
+++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_bmap_util.c
@@ -1626,7 +1626,6 @@ xfs_swap_extents(
struct xfs_bstat*sbp = &sxp->sx_stat;
int src_log_flags, target_log_flags;
int error = 0;
- int lock_flags;
uint64_tf;
int resblks = 0;
unsigned intflags = 0;
@@ -1638,8 +1637,8 @@ xfs_swap_extents(
* do the rest of the checks.
*/
lock_two_nondirectories(VFS_I(ip), VFS_I(tip));
- lock_flags = XFS_MMAPLOCK_EXCL;
- xfs_lock_two_inodes(ip, XFS_MMAPLOCK_EXCL, tip, XFS_MMAPLOCK_EXCL);
+ filemap_invalidate_lock_two(VFS_I(ip)->i_mapping,
+ VFS_I(tip)->i_mapping);
/* Verify that both files have the same format */
if ((VFS_I(ip)->i_mode & S_IFMT) != (VFS_I(tip)->i_mode & S_IFMT)) {
@@ -1711,7 +1710,6 @@ xfs_swap_extents(
* or cancel will unlock the inodes from this point onwards.
*/
xfs_lock_two_inodes(ip, XFS_ILOCK_EXCL, tip, XFS_ILOCK_EXCL);
- lock_flags |= XFS_ILOCK_EXCL;
xfs_trans_ijoin(tp, ip, 0);
xfs_trans_ijoin(tp, tip, 0);
@@ -1830,13 +1828,16 @@ xfs_swap_extents(
trace_xfs_swap_extent_after(ip, 0);
trace_xfs_swap_extent_after(tip, 1);
+out_unlock_ilock:
+ xfs_iunlock(ip, XFS_ILOCK_EXCL);
+ xfs_iunlock(tip, XFS_ILOCK_EXCL);
out_unlock:
- xfs_iunlock(ip, lock_flags);
- xfs_iunlock(tip, lock_flags);
+ filemap_invalidate_unlock_two(VFS_I(ip)->i_mapping,
+ VFS_I(tip)->i_mapping);
unlock_two_nondirectories(VFS_I(ip), VFS_I(tip));
return error;
out_trans_cancel:
xfs_trans_cancel(tp);
- goto out_unlock;
+ goto out_unlock_ilock;
}
diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_inode.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_inode.c
index da0c3b62dae6..c963b9dc484b 100644
--- a/fs/xfs/xfs_inode.c
+++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_inode.c
@@ -551,12 +551,10 @@ xfs_lock_inodes(
}
/*
- * xfs_lock_two_inodes() can only be used to lock one type of lock at a time -
- * the mmaplock or the ilock, but not more than one type at a time. If we lock
- * more than one at a time, lockdep will report false positives saying we have
- * violated locking orders. The iolock must be double-locked separately since
- * we use i_rwsem for that. We now support taking one lock EXCL and the other
- * SHARED.
+ * xfs_lock_two_inodes() can only be used to lock ilock. The iolock and
+ * mmaplock must be double-locked separately since we use i_rwsem and
+ * invalidate_lock for that. We now support taking one lock EXCL and the
+ * other SHARED.
*/
void
xfs_lock_two_inodes(
@@ -574,15 +572,8 @@ xfs_lock_two_inodes(
ASSERT(hweight32(ip1_mode) == 1);
ASSERT(!(ip0_mode & (XFS_IOLOCK_SHARED|XFS_IOLOCK_EXCL)));
ASSERT(!(ip1_mode & (XFS_IOLOCK_SHARED|XFS_IOLOCK_EXCL)));
- ASSERT(!(ip0_mode & (XFS_MMAPLOCK_SHARED|XFS_MMAPLOCK_EXCL)) ||
- !(ip0_mode & (XFS_ILOCK_SHARED|XFS_ILOCK_EXCL)));
- ASSERT(!(ip1_mode & (XFS_MMAPLOCK_SHARED|XFS_MMAPLOCK_EXCL)) ||
- !(ip1_mode & (XFS_ILOCK_SHARED|XFS_ILOCK_EXCL)));
- ASSERT(!(ip1_mode & (XFS_MMAPLOCK_SHARED|XFS_MMAPLOCK_EXCL)) ||
- !(ip0_mode & (XFS_ILOCK_SHARED|XFS_ILOCK_EXCL)));
- ASSERT(!(ip0_mode & (XFS_MMAPLOCK_SHARED|XFS_MMAPLOCK_EXCL)) ||
- !(ip1_mode & (XFS_ILOCK_SHARED|XFS_ILOCK_EXCL)));
-
+ ASSERT(!(ip0_mode & (XFS_MMAPLOCK_SHARED|XFS_MMAPLOCK_EXCL)));
+ ASSERT(!(ip1_mode & (XFS_MMAPLOCK_SHARED|XFS_MMAPLOCK_EXCL)));
ASSERT(ip0->i_ino != ip1->i_ino);
if (ip0->i_ino > ip1->i_ino) {
@@ -3774,11 +3765,8 @@ xfs_ilock2_io_mmap(
ret = xfs_iolock_two_inodes_and_break_layout(VFS_I(ip1), VFS_I(ip2));
if (ret)
return ret;
- if (ip1 == ip2)
- xfs_ilock(ip1, XFS_MMAPLOCK_EXCL);
- else
- xfs_lock_two_inodes(ip1, XFS_MMAPLOCK_EXCL,
- ip2, XFS_MMAPLOCK_EXCL);
+ filemap_invalidate_lock_two(VFS_I(ip1)->i_mapping,
+ VFS_I(ip2)->i_mapping);
return 0;
}
@@ -3788,12 +3776,9 @@ xfs_iunlock2_io_mmap(
struct xfs_inode*ip1,
struct xfs_inode*ip2)
{
-
Re: [f2fs-dev] [PATCH 09/14] xfs: Convert double locking of MMAPLOCK to use VFS helpers
On Mon, Jun 07, 2021 at 04:52:19PM +0200, Jan Kara wrote:
> Convert places in XFS that take MMAPLOCK for two inodes to use helper
> VFS provides for it (filemap_invalidate_down_write_two()). Note that
> this changes lock ordering for MMAPLOCK from inode number based ordering
> to pointer based ordering VFS generally uses.
>
> CC: "Darrick J. Wong"
> Reviewed-by: Darrick J. Wong
> Signed-off-by: Jan Kara
Looks straightforward,
Reviewed-by: Darrick J. Wong
--D
> ---
> fs/xfs/xfs_bmap_util.c | 15 ---
> fs/xfs/xfs_inode.c | 37 +++--
> 2 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 33 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_bmap_util.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_bmap_util.c
> index a5e9d7d34023..7421d6ec4def 100644
> --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_bmap_util.c
> +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_bmap_util.c
> @@ -1582,7 +1582,6 @@ xfs_swap_extents(
> struct xfs_bstat*sbp = &sxp->sx_stat;
> int src_log_flags, target_log_flags;
> int error = 0;
> - int lock_flags;
> uint64_tf;
> int resblks = 0;
> unsigned intflags = 0;
> @@ -1594,8 +1593,8 @@ xfs_swap_extents(
>* do the rest of the checks.
>*/
> lock_two_nondirectories(VFS_I(ip), VFS_I(tip));
> - lock_flags = XFS_MMAPLOCK_EXCL;
> - xfs_lock_two_inodes(ip, XFS_MMAPLOCK_EXCL, tip, XFS_MMAPLOCK_EXCL);
> + filemap_invalidate_lock_two(VFS_I(ip)->i_mapping,
> + VFS_I(tip)->i_mapping);
>
> /* Verify that both files have the same format */
> if ((VFS_I(ip)->i_mode & S_IFMT) != (VFS_I(tip)->i_mode & S_IFMT)) {
> @@ -1667,7 +1666,6 @@ xfs_swap_extents(
>* or cancel will unlock the inodes from this point onwards.
>*/
> xfs_lock_two_inodes(ip, XFS_ILOCK_EXCL, tip, XFS_ILOCK_EXCL);
> - lock_flags |= XFS_ILOCK_EXCL;
> xfs_trans_ijoin(tp, ip, 0);
> xfs_trans_ijoin(tp, tip, 0);
>
> @@ -1786,13 +1784,16 @@ xfs_swap_extents(
> trace_xfs_swap_extent_after(ip, 0);
> trace_xfs_swap_extent_after(tip, 1);
>
> +out_unlock_ilock:
> + xfs_iunlock(ip, XFS_ILOCK_EXCL);
> + xfs_iunlock(tip, XFS_ILOCK_EXCL);
> out_unlock:
> - xfs_iunlock(ip, lock_flags);
> - xfs_iunlock(tip, lock_flags);
> + filemap_invalidate_unlock_two(VFS_I(ip)->i_mapping,
> + VFS_I(tip)->i_mapping);
> unlock_two_nondirectories(VFS_I(ip), VFS_I(tip));
> return error;
>
> out_trans_cancel:
> xfs_trans_cancel(tp);
> - goto out_unlock;
> + goto out_unlock_ilock;
> }
> diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_inode.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_inode.c
> index e1854a660809..0468f56f3bbb 100644
> --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_inode.c
> +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_inode.c
> @@ -556,12 +556,10 @@ xfs_lock_inodes(
> }
>
> /*
> - * xfs_lock_two_inodes() can only be used to lock one type of lock at a time
> -
> - * the mmaplock or the ilock, but not more than one type at a time. If we
> lock
> - * more than one at a time, lockdep will report false positives saying we
> have
> - * violated locking orders. The iolock must be double-locked separately
> since
> - * we use i_rwsem for that. We now support taking one lock EXCL and the
> other
> - * SHARED.
> + * xfs_lock_two_inodes() can only be used to lock ilock. The iolock and
> + * mmaplock must be double-locked separately since we use i_rwsem and
> + * invalidate_lock for that. We now support taking one lock EXCL and the
> + * other SHARED.
> */
> void
> xfs_lock_two_inodes(
> @@ -579,15 +577,8 @@ xfs_lock_two_inodes(
> ASSERT(hweight32(ip1_mode) == 1);
> ASSERT(!(ip0_mode & (XFS_IOLOCK_SHARED|XFS_IOLOCK_EXCL)));
> ASSERT(!(ip1_mode & (XFS_IOLOCK_SHARED|XFS_IOLOCK_EXCL)));
> - ASSERT(!(ip0_mode & (XFS_MMAPLOCK_SHARED|XFS_MMAPLOCK_EXCL)) ||
> -!(ip0_mode & (XFS_ILOCK_SHARED|XFS_ILOCK_EXCL)));
> - ASSERT(!(ip1_mode & (XFS_MMAPLOCK_SHARED|XFS_MMAPLOCK_EXCL)) ||
> -!(ip1_mode & (XFS_ILOCK_SHARED|XFS_ILOCK_EXCL)));
> - ASSERT(!(ip1_mode & (XFS_MMAPLOCK_SHARED|XFS_MMAPLOCK_EXCL)) ||
> -!(ip0_mode & (XFS_ILOCK_SHARED|XFS_ILOCK_EXCL)));
> - ASSERT(!(ip0_mode & (XFS_MMAPLOCK_SHARED|XFS_MMAPLOCK_EXCL)) ||
> -!(ip1_mode & (XFS_ILOCK_SHARED|XFS_ILOCK_EXCL)));
> -
> + ASSERT(!(ip0_mode & (XFS_MMAPLOCK_SHARED|XFS_MMAPLOCK_EXCL)));
> + ASSERT(!(ip1_mode & (XFS_MMAPLOCK_SHARED|XFS_MMAPLOCK_EXCL)));
> ASSERT(ip0->i_ino != ip1->i_ino);
>
> if (ip0->i_ino > ip1->i_ino) {
> @@ -3750,11 +3741,8 @@ xfs_ilock2_io_mmap(
> ret = xfs_iolock_two_inodes_and_break_layout(VFS_I(ip1), VFS_I(ip2));
> if (ret)
> return ret;
> - if (ip1 == ip2)
> - xfs_ilock(ip1, XFS_MMAPLOCK_EXCL);
> - else
> - xfs_lock_two_inodes(ip1, XFS_MMAPLOCK_EXCL,
> - ip2, XFS_MMAPLOCK_EXCL);
> + filemap_invalidate_l
[f2fs-dev] [PATCH 09/14] xfs: Convert double locking of MMAPLOCK to use VFS helpers
Convert places in XFS that take MMAPLOCK for two inodes to use helper
VFS provides for it (filemap_invalidate_down_write_two()). Note that
this changes lock ordering for MMAPLOCK from inode number based ordering
to pointer based ordering VFS generally uses.
CC: "Darrick J. Wong"
Reviewed-by: Darrick J. Wong
Signed-off-by: Jan Kara
---
fs/xfs/xfs_bmap_util.c | 15 ---
fs/xfs/xfs_inode.c | 37 +++--
2 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 33 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_bmap_util.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_bmap_util.c
index a5e9d7d34023..7421d6ec4def 100644
--- a/fs/xfs/xfs_bmap_util.c
+++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_bmap_util.c
@@ -1582,7 +1582,6 @@ xfs_swap_extents(
struct xfs_bstat*sbp = &sxp->sx_stat;
int src_log_flags, target_log_flags;
int error = 0;
- int lock_flags;
uint64_tf;
int resblks = 0;
unsigned intflags = 0;
@@ -1594,8 +1593,8 @@ xfs_swap_extents(
* do the rest of the checks.
*/
lock_two_nondirectories(VFS_I(ip), VFS_I(tip));
- lock_flags = XFS_MMAPLOCK_EXCL;
- xfs_lock_two_inodes(ip, XFS_MMAPLOCK_EXCL, tip, XFS_MMAPLOCK_EXCL);
+ filemap_invalidate_lock_two(VFS_I(ip)->i_mapping,
+ VFS_I(tip)->i_mapping);
/* Verify that both files have the same format */
if ((VFS_I(ip)->i_mode & S_IFMT) != (VFS_I(tip)->i_mode & S_IFMT)) {
@@ -1667,7 +1666,6 @@ xfs_swap_extents(
* or cancel will unlock the inodes from this point onwards.
*/
xfs_lock_two_inodes(ip, XFS_ILOCK_EXCL, tip, XFS_ILOCK_EXCL);
- lock_flags |= XFS_ILOCK_EXCL;
xfs_trans_ijoin(tp, ip, 0);
xfs_trans_ijoin(tp, tip, 0);
@@ -1786,13 +1784,16 @@ xfs_swap_extents(
trace_xfs_swap_extent_after(ip, 0);
trace_xfs_swap_extent_after(tip, 1);
+out_unlock_ilock:
+ xfs_iunlock(ip, XFS_ILOCK_EXCL);
+ xfs_iunlock(tip, XFS_ILOCK_EXCL);
out_unlock:
- xfs_iunlock(ip, lock_flags);
- xfs_iunlock(tip, lock_flags);
+ filemap_invalidate_unlock_two(VFS_I(ip)->i_mapping,
+ VFS_I(tip)->i_mapping);
unlock_two_nondirectories(VFS_I(ip), VFS_I(tip));
return error;
out_trans_cancel:
xfs_trans_cancel(tp);
- goto out_unlock;
+ goto out_unlock_ilock;
}
diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_inode.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_inode.c
index e1854a660809..0468f56f3bbb 100644
--- a/fs/xfs/xfs_inode.c
+++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_inode.c
@@ -556,12 +556,10 @@ xfs_lock_inodes(
}
/*
- * xfs_lock_two_inodes() can only be used to lock one type of lock at a time -
- * the mmaplock or the ilock, but not more than one type at a time. If we lock
- * more than one at a time, lockdep will report false positives saying we have
- * violated locking orders. The iolock must be double-locked separately since
- * we use i_rwsem for that. We now support taking one lock EXCL and the other
- * SHARED.
+ * xfs_lock_two_inodes() can only be used to lock ilock. The iolock and
+ * mmaplock must be double-locked separately since we use i_rwsem and
+ * invalidate_lock for that. We now support taking one lock EXCL and the
+ * other SHARED.
*/
void
xfs_lock_two_inodes(
@@ -579,15 +577,8 @@ xfs_lock_two_inodes(
ASSERT(hweight32(ip1_mode) == 1);
ASSERT(!(ip0_mode & (XFS_IOLOCK_SHARED|XFS_IOLOCK_EXCL)));
ASSERT(!(ip1_mode & (XFS_IOLOCK_SHARED|XFS_IOLOCK_EXCL)));
- ASSERT(!(ip0_mode & (XFS_MMAPLOCK_SHARED|XFS_MMAPLOCK_EXCL)) ||
- !(ip0_mode & (XFS_ILOCK_SHARED|XFS_ILOCK_EXCL)));
- ASSERT(!(ip1_mode & (XFS_MMAPLOCK_SHARED|XFS_MMAPLOCK_EXCL)) ||
- !(ip1_mode & (XFS_ILOCK_SHARED|XFS_ILOCK_EXCL)));
- ASSERT(!(ip1_mode & (XFS_MMAPLOCK_SHARED|XFS_MMAPLOCK_EXCL)) ||
- !(ip0_mode & (XFS_ILOCK_SHARED|XFS_ILOCK_EXCL)));
- ASSERT(!(ip0_mode & (XFS_MMAPLOCK_SHARED|XFS_MMAPLOCK_EXCL)) ||
- !(ip1_mode & (XFS_ILOCK_SHARED|XFS_ILOCK_EXCL)));
-
+ ASSERT(!(ip0_mode & (XFS_MMAPLOCK_SHARED|XFS_MMAPLOCK_EXCL)));
+ ASSERT(!(ip1_mode & (XFS_MMAPLOCK_SHARED|XFS_MMAPLOCK_EXCL)));
ASSERT(ip0->i_ino != ip1->i_ino);
if (ip0->i_ino > ip1->i_ino) {
@@ -3750,11 +3741,8 @@ xfs_ilock2_io_mmap(
ret = xfs_iolock_two_inodes_and_break_layout(VFS_I(ip1), VFS_I(ip2));
if (ret)
return ret;
- if (ip1 == ip2)
- xfs_ilock(ip1, XFS_MMAPLOCK_EXCL);
- else
- xfs_lock_two_inodes(ip1, XFS_MMAPLOCK_EXCL,
- ip2, XFS_MMAPLOCK_EXCL);
+ filemap_invalidate_lock_two(VFS_I(ip1)->i_mapping,
+ VFS_I(ip2)->i_mapping);
return 0;
}
@@ -3764,12 +3752,9 @@ xfs_iunlock2_io_mmap(
struct xfs_inode*ip1,
struct xfs_inode*ip2)
{
-
