Re: Any plans to get rid of nfs+overlayfs for netboot?
Thomas Lange la...@informatik.uni-koeln.de wrote: I tested FAI 4.0 and dracut inside a wheezy nfsroot on a squeeze install server. This works fine. I can reproduce your errors on a wheezy install server. I will have a look into it. Maybe you can write a simple bug report for this. I filed Bug#676882 (LVM) and Bug#676883 (NFS) tschuess thomas
Re: Any plans to get rid of nfs+overlayfs for netboot?
On Thu, 24 May 2012 16:53:25 +0200, Thomas Neumann blacky+...@fluffbunny.de said: - nfs/aufs related quirks - c) aufs does not work. Tells me something is not right (/etc/fstab, /sysconfig/etc/fstab is missing) and gives up with a a kernel panic. I tested FAI 4.0 and dracut inside a wheezy nfsroot on a squeeze install server. This works fine. I can reproduce your errors on a wheezy install server. I will have a look into it. Maybe you can write a simple bug report for this. Any plans to get rid of nfs+overlayfs for netboot? No. NFS + aufs is a good combination and FAI is using it for several years. But if you do like to do it without nfs+aufs read http://fai-project.org/doc/man/fai-nfsroot2image.html It's working like a charm. -- regards Thomas
Re: Any plans to get rid of nfs+overlayfs for netboot?
Hello I tested FAI 4.0 and dracut inside a wheezy nfsroot on a squeeze install server. This works fine. I can reproduce your errors on a wheezy install server. I will have a look into it. Maybe you can write a simple bug report for this. No. NFS + aufs is a good combination and FAI is using it for several years. But if you do like to do it without nfs+aufs read http://fai-project.org/doc/man/fai-nfsroot2image.html It's working like a charm. Thank you for both hints. I will try it as soon as I have a bit of time! Bugreport: Surely. bye thomas
