Re: [00/36] Large Blocksize Support V6
On Sat, 1 Sep 2007, Peter Zijlstra wrote: by mixing large order pages into the regular lru, page aging gets rather unfair. Not in general, only for particular loads. On average this is okay. It is consistent to age the whole block and not just a part of it. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-fsdevel in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Re: [00/36] Large Blocksize Support V6
On Tue, 2007-08-28 at 12:05 -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Todo/Issues: - reclaim by mixing large order pages into the regular lru, page aging gets rather unfair. One possible solution to this is address_space based reclaim, something which might also be beneficial for containers. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-fsdevel in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Re: [00/36] Large Blocksize Support V6
Stoopp! This patchseries is entirely unacceptable! one patch per file is the most braindead and most unacceptable way to split a series. Please stop whatever you're doing right now and correct it and send out a patch that has one patch per logical change for the whole tree. This means people can actually read the patch, and it's bisectable. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-fsdevel in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
