Re: [PATCH 2/4] VFS: swap do_ioctl and vfs_ioctl names

2007-10-30 Thread Erez Zadok
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Christoph Hellwig writes:
> On Tue, Oct 30, 2007 at 08:22:40AM -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> > They are just treated as part of the parameter explanation text.
> > I don't see any problem with them.
> 
> Well, it's completely inconsistant with any other kerneldoc..

If it doesn't hurt, and kerneldoc will present it as such, then I'd leave
the [in/out] in place.  Ioctls are the few places where you can have
variables used as both input and output; so _somehow_ we need to capture
that behavior.

Erez.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


Re: [PATCH 2/4] VFS: swap do_ioctl and vfs_ioctl names

2007-10-30 Thread Randy Dunlap
On Tue, 30 Oct 2007 17:14:36 + Christoph Hellwig wrote:

> On Tue, Oct 30, 2007 at 08:22:40AM -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> > They are just treated as part of the parameter explanation text.
> > I don't see any problem with them.
> 
> Well, it's completely inconsistant with any other kerneldoc..

True.  and it has an advantage.

---
~Randy
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


Re: [PATCH 2/4] VFS: swap do_ioctl and vfs_ioctl names

2007-10-30 Thread Christoph Hellwig
On Tue, Oct 30, 2007 at 08:22:40AM -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> They are just treated as part of the parameter explanation text.
> I don't see any problem with them.

Well, it's completely inconsistant with any other kerneldoc..


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


Re: [PATCH 2/4] VFS: swap do_ioctl and vfs_ioctl names

2007-10-30 Thread Randy Dunlap
On Tue, 30 Oct 2007 09:56:53 + Christoph Hellwig wrote:

> On Sun, Oct 28, 2007 at 08:40:56PM -0400, Erez Zadok wrote:
> > +/**
> > + * vfs_ioctl - call filesystem specific ioctl methods
> > + *
> > + * @filp: [in] open file to invoke ioctl method on
> > + * @cmd:  [in] ioctl command to execute
> > + * @arg:  [in/out] command-specific argument for ioctl
> 
> I've never seen these in/out annotations and doubt they're valid in
> kerneldoc.  Randy?

They are just treated as part of the parameter explanation text.
I don't see any problem with them.

> > + * Invokes filesystem specific ->unlock_ioctl, if one exists; otherwise
> 
> unlocked_ioctl


---
~Randy
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


Re: [PATCH 2/4] VFS: swap do_ioctl and vfs_ioctl names

2007-10-30 Thread Christoph Hellwig
On Sun, Oct 28, 2007 at 08:40:56PM -0400, Erez Zadok wrote:
> +/**
> + * vfs_ioctl - call filesystem specific ioctl methods
> + *
> + * @filp: [in] open file to invoke ioctl method on
> + * @cmd:  [in] ioctl command to execute
> + * @arg:  [in/out] command-specific argument for ioctl

I've never seen these in/out annotations and doubt they're valid in
kerneldoc.  Randy?

> + * Invokes filesystem specific ->unlock_ioctl, if one exists; otherwise

unlocked_ioctl

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


Re: [PATCH 2/4] VFS: swap do_ioctl and vfs_ioctl names

2007-10-28 Thread Randy Dunlap
On Sun, 28 Oct 2007 20:40:56 -0400 Erez Zadok wrote:

> Rename old vfs_ioctl to do_ioctl, because the comment above it clearly
> indicates that it is an internal function not to be exported to modules;
> therefore it should have a more traditional do_XXX name.  The new do_ioctl
> is exported in fs.h but not to modules.
> 
> Rename the old do_ioctl to vfs_ioctl because the names vfs_XXX should
> preferably be reserved to callable VFS functions which modules may call, as
> many other vfs_XXX functions already do.  Export the new vfs_ioctl to GPL
> modules so others can use it (including Unionfs and eCryptfs).  Add DocBook
> for new vfs_ioctl.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Erez Zadok <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> ---
>  fs/compat_ioctl.c  |2 +-
>  fs/ioctl.c |   30 ++
>  include/linux/fs.h |3 ++-
>  3 files changed, 25 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
> 

> diff --git a/fs/ioctl.c b/fs/ioctl.c
> index 652cacf..34e3f58 100644
> --- a/fs/ioctl.c
> +++ b/fs/ioctl.c
> @@ -16,8 +16,21 @@
>  
>  #include 
>  
> -static long do_ioctl(struct file *filp, unsigned int cmd,
> - unsigned long arg)
> +/**
> + * vfs_ioctl - call filesystem specific ioctl methods
> + *

No "blank" line allowed in kernel-doc between function name and its
parameters.

> + * @filp: [in] open file to invoke ioctl method on
> + * @cmd:  [in] ioctl command to execute
> + * @arg:  [in/out] command-specific argument for ioctl
> + *
> + * Invokes filesystem specific ->unlock_ioctl, if one exists; otherwise
> + * invokes * filesystem specific ->ioctl method.  If neither method exists,
> + * returns -ENOTTY.
> + *
> + * Returns 0 on success, -errno on error.
> + */
> +long vfs_ioctl(struct file *filp, unsigned int cmd,
> +unsigned long arg)
>  {
>   int error = -ENOTTY;
>  

> diff --git a/include/linux/fs.h b/include/linux/fs.h
> index b3ec4a4..c0c5d36 100644
> --- a/include/linux/fs.h
> +++ b/include/linux/fs.h
> @@ -1924,7 +1924,8 @@ extern int vfs_stat_fd(int dfd, char __user *, struct 
> kstat *);
>  extern int vfs_lstat_fd(int dfd, char __user *, struct kstat *);
>  extern int vfs_fstat(unsigned int, struct kstat *);
>  
> -extern int vfs_ioctl(struct file *, unsigned int, unsigned int, unsigned 
> long);
> +extern long vfs_ioctl(struct file *filp, unsigned int cmd, unsigned long 
> arg);
> +extern int do_ioctl(struct file *, unsigned int, unsigned int, unsigned 
> long);

Use/keep parameter names, please.  That is preferred.

>  extern void get_filesystem(struct file_system_type *fs);
>  extern void put_filesystem(struct file_system_type *fs);
> -- 
> 1.5.2.2
> 
> -
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/
> 


---
~Randy
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html