Re: [Linux-HA] Beginner questions
On Sat, 21 Mar 2009 16:03:41 +, Andrew Wood wrote > I would imagine you would need to monitor the Squid process yourself > with a little script or program and take the network interface down to > force a failover if Squid crashed. > > Im new to this myself though so someone may correct me? > > Les Mikesell wrote: > > Is that typical or are there monitors for the service itself so > > failover would happen if the squid process is not running or stops > > accepting connections? > > ___ > Linux-HA mailing list > Linux-HA@lists.linux-ha.org > http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha > See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems > > -- > This message has been scanned for viruses and > dangerous content by MailScanner, and is > believed to be clean. If it's a matter of monitoring Squid, how about using monit. For that matter, why not use monit to both restart Squid should it stop? Dimitri -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean. ___ Linux-HA mailing list Linux-HA@lists.linux-ha.org http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems
Re: [Linux-HA] Beginner questions
I would imagine you would need to monitor the Squid process yourself with a little script or program and take the network interface down to force a failover if Squid crashed. Im new to this myself though so someone may correct me? Les Mikesell wrote: Is that typical or are there monitors for the service itself so failover would happen if the squid process is not running or stops accepting connections? ___ Linux-HA mailing list Linux-HA@lists.linux-ha.org http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems
Re: [Linux-HA] heartbeat 3.0 roadmap
Am Freitag, 20. März 2009 14:01:07 schrieb Thomas Mueller: > hi > > is there some heartbeat 3.0 roadmap? is there a plan when it's gonna be > released? > > i've found http://www.linux-ha.org/RoadMap but it seems to be a bit > outdated. > > - Thomas Hi, LMB had a talk on the future of Linux-HA at the Linux Congress 2008 in Hamburg. See the talk at: http://data.guug.de/slides/lk2008/LK-2008-HA.pdf Interesting details about the future of the clusterstacks (heartbeat scratched out!) and the cooperation with Red Hat. > > ___ > Linux-HA mailing list > Linux-HA@lists.linux-ha.org > http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha > See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems -- Dr. Michael Schwartzkopff MultiNET Services GmbH Addresse: Bretonischer Ring 7; 85630 Grasbrunn; Germany Tel: +49 - 89 - 45 69 11 0 Fax: +49 - 89 - 45 69 11 21 mob: +49 - 174 - 343 28 75 mail: mi...@multinet.de web: www.multinet.de Sitz der Gesellschaft: 85630 Grasbrunn Registergericht: Amtsgericht München HRB 114375 Geschäftsführer: Günter Jurgeneit, Hubert Martens --- PGP Fingerprint: F919 3919 FF12 ED5A 2801 DEA6 AA77 57A4 EDD8 979B Skype: misch42 ___ Linux-HA mailing list Linux-HA@lists.linux-ha.org http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems
[Linux-HA] expected-quorum-votes
Hi, crmd metadata tells me that expected-quorum-votes are used to calculate quorum in openais based clusters. Its default value is 2. Do I have to change this value if I have 3 or more nodes in a OpenAIS based cluster? -- Dr. Michael Schwartzkopff MultiNET Services GmbH Addresse: Bretonischer Ring 7; 85630 Grasbrunn; Germany Tel: +49 - 89 - 45 69 11 0 Fax: +49 - 89 - 45 69 11 21 mob: +49 - 174 - 343 28 75 mail: mi...@multinet.de web: www.multinet.de Sitz der Gesellschaft: 85630 Grasbrunn Registergericht: Amtsgericht München HRB 114375 Geschäftsführer: Günter Jurgeneit, Hubert Martens --- PGP Fingerprint: F919 3919 FF12 ED5A 2801 DEA6 AA77 57A4 EDD8 979B Skype: misch42 ___ Linux-HA mailing list Linux-HA@lists.linux-ha.org http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems
[Linux-HA] suicide in no-quorum-policy
Hi, in the metadata of the pengine I found the option no-quorum-policy which can be set to "suicide". What exactly does the node do, when this option is set up suicide? Has STONITH to be configured to make this option work? As far as I remenber, there once was the dicsussion, that no node can commit suicide via STONITH. Is this still valid? Makes this option sense, If STONITH is used? Or a some other mechanism used? Thanks the enlightening answers. -- Dr. Michael Schwartzkopff MultiNET Services GmbH Addresse: Bretonischer Ring 7; 85630 Grasbrunn; Germany Tel: +49 - 89 - 45 69 11 0 Fax: +49 - 89 - 45 69 11 21 mob: +49 - 174 - 343 28 75 mail: mi...@multinet.de web: www.multinet.de Sitz der Gesellschaft: 85630 Grasbrunn Registergericht: Amtsgericht München HRB 114375 Geschäftsführer: Günter Jurgeneit, Hubert Martens --- PGP Fingerprint: F919 3919 FF12 ED5A 2801 DEA6 AA77 57A4 EDD8 979B Skype: misch42 ___ Linux-HA mailing list Linux-HA@lists.linux-ha.org http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems
[Linux-HA] maintenance-mode of pengine
Hi, In the metadata of the pengine I found the attribute maintenance-mode. I did not find any documentation about it. The long description also says: "Should the cluster ...". Anybody knows what this options does? Thanks. -- Dr. Michael Schwartzkopff MultiNET Services GmbH Addresse: Bretonischer Ring 7; 85630 Grasbrunn; Germany Tel: +49 - 89 - 45 69 11 0 Fax: +49 - 89 - 45 69 11 21 mob: +49 - 174 - 343 28 75 mail: mi...@multinet.de web: www.multinet.de Sitz der Gesellschaft: 85630 Grasbrunn Registergericht: Amtsgericht München HRB 114375 Geschäftsführer: Günter Jurgeneit, Hubert Martens --- PGP Fingerprint: F919 3919 FF12 ED5A 2801 DEA6 AA77 57A4 EDD8 979B Skype: misch42 ___ Linux-HA mailing list Linux-HA@lists.linux-ha.org http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems
Re: [Linux-HA] DRBD + NFS toggle mount.
On Fri, Mar 20, 2009 at 11:54:57PM -0400, Ben Timby wrote: > Given two nodes that share a DRBD volume. The active node exports the > volume over NFS. The passive node mounts the volume via NFS. The > primary node mounts the volume directly. > > Upon failure of the primary node, one would want the secondary node to > take control and mount the volume directly. > > How would one configure the Filesystem resources in such a manner? Ben, As it says on on Hint 1 on http://linux-ha.org/HaNFS, don't try to mount any NFS filesystem on one of your NFS servers. You'll get nothing but grief. - Dave ___ Linux-HA mailing list Linux-HA@lists.linux-ha.org http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems
