Re: [Linux-HA] Always reload/restart a resource
Am Freitag, den 13. Mai 2011 schrubte Viacheslav: > I don't completely understand your problem. But you can edit init > script of samba service. Or reload config manually. Yes, but doing anything manually here makes no sense. I am looking for something like the old heartbeat 1 behaviour. I had for example in my haresources "syslog-ng::restart", so syslog-ng was restarted independent of the action. -- <) .--. )#=+ ' Gruesse, /## | .+. Regards, ,,/###,|,,| Micha ___ Linux-HA mailing list Linux-HA@lists.linux-ha.org http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems
[Linux-HA] CIB process quits and could not connect to CRM
Hello, I'm struggling the same problem on RHEL 6. Does anyone have some idea of solving this out? Any help would be appreciated. Best Regards, Mateusz ___ Linux-HA mailing list Linux-HA@lists.linux-ha.org http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems
[Linux-HA] Event: an Heartbeat/Corosync/DRBD/Pacemaker free seminar in Rho (Milan, Italy), on June 24 2011
Hi all, I hope that this message is not too off-topic, but I want to present to you a seminar that will take place in Rho (MI), Italy, on June 24 2011. The title is "Evoluzione dell'alta affidabilità su Linux", it will be a one day seminar which will be focused on the evolution of the Linux clustering. From Heartbeat to Pacemaker, passing by DRBD and Corosync. There will be also a lab part with the creation of an active-active NFS server based on LVM and DRBD. All the project is made by MMUL (http://www.mmul.it) in collaboration with Linbit (http://www.linbit.com, thanks to Florian). I know that the most of you are not Italian, but it maybe a good reason to come and see the "Bel Paese". Here are all the informations about the event: http://www.miamammausalinux.org/2011/05/i-seminari-di-mia-mamma-usa-linux-evoluzione-dellalta-affidabilita-su-linux/ It will be totally free, with a brief lunch included, everything offered by MMUL. Let me say that without your every-day help, this event would have never been possible. Have a nice day, -- RaSca Mia Mamma Usa Linux: Niente è impossibile da capire, se lo spieghi bene! ra...@miamammausalinux.org http://www.miamammausalinux.org ___ Linux-HA mailing list Linux-HA@lists.linux-ha.org http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems
Re: [Linux-HA] Best way for colocating resource on a dual primary drbd
Il giorno Lun 16 Mag 2011 09:01:08 CET, Andrew Beekhof ha scritto: [...] >> Implicit that once the resource go away it becomes slave? > Pretty sure this is a bug in 1.0. > Have you tried 1.1.5 ? Not yet, but so Andrew are you saying that keeping the colocation even if I have a dual primary drbd is the best thing to do? -- RaSca Mia Mamma Usa Linux: Niente è impossibile da capire, se lo spieghi bene! ra...@miamammausalinux.org http://www.miamammausalinux.org ___ Linux-HA mailing list Linux-HA@lists.linux-ha.org http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems
Re: [Linux-HA] Best way for colocating resource on a dual primary drbd
On Sat, May 14, 2011 at 9:31 AM, RaSca wrote: > Il giorno Ven 13 Mag 2011 16:09:14 CET, Viacheslav Biriukov ha scritto: >> In your case you have two drbd master. So, I think, it is not a good >> idea to create that collocation. Instead of this you can set location >> directives to locate vm-test_virtualdomain where you want to be default. >> For example: >> location L_vm-test_virtualdomain_01 vm-test_virtualdomain 100: master1.node >> location L_vm-test_virtualdomain_02 vm-test_virtualdomain 10: master2.node > > And I agree to your point of view (since I test that the colocation is > not working). But the point is: why? I mean, the colocation defines that > the drbd device must run in a node where drbd is Master. Why Pacemaker > puts drbd in slave on the node in which the migration start? Does a > colocation like this: > > colocation vm-test_virtualdomain_ON_vm-test_ms-r0 inf: > vm-test_virtualdomain vm-test_ms-r0:Master > > Implicit that once the resource go away it becomes slave? Pretty sure this is a bug in 1.0. Have you tried 1.1.5 ? ___ Linux-HA mailing list Linux-HA@lists.linux-ha.org http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems
