Re: [Linux-HA] Link recovery?
From: Ulrich Windl ulrich.wi...@rz.uni-regensburg.de To: linux-ha@lists.linux-ha.org linux-ha@lists.linux-ha.org; Michael Moon moo...@yahoo.com Sent: Tuesday, August 9, 2011 11:44 PM Subject: Antw: [Linux-HA] Link recovery? Did you try # corosync-cfgtool -s or examine the logs? Why would I try corosync-cfgtool -s if I am not running corosync? Did I examine the logs? Did you even read my posting? When I unplug eth1 on Box A, both ha-log files correctly show that eth1 on Box A is dead. If I plug the connection back in, Box A reports that eth1 is back up, but Box B continues to show that the link to Box A is dead. ___ Linux-HA mailing list Linux-HA@lists.linux-ha.org http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems
[Linux-HA] Link recovery?
I am setting up a test between two machines (Box A Box B) running heartbeat 3.0.4. I have two connections (eth0 eth1) from each machine connected to a switch. When I unplug eth1 on Box A, both ha-log files correctly show that eth1 on Box A is dead. If I plug the connection back in, Box A reports that eth1 is back up, but Box B continues to show that the link to Box A is dead. eth0 is on a 10.10.10.x network eth1 each has a static IP of 169.254.10.1 .2 respectively. If I now unplug eth0, I get a split brain situation because Box B has now thinks both heartbeat paths are dead. Anyone have any idea why the link would not correctly show the link has recovered? Thanks, Mike ___ Linux-HA mailing list Linux-HA@lists.linux-ha.org http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems
