It is OCF_ERR_GENERIC, not OCF_ERROR_GENERIC. Read
/usr/lib/ocf/resource.d/heartbeat/.ocf-returncodes
You can also use ocf-tester to test your ocf script.
Regards
Dominik
lakshmipadmaja maddali wrote:
Hi all,
I have a strange issue, that ocf_error_generic is being
ingored at times.
For example, suppose in the start function of the ocf script if I
explicity return ocf_error_generic, the services should shift to the
secondary node as of my knowledge, but that's not happening. Instead,
heartbeat is calling monitor function again and again.
But if I explicity mention exit(1) in the start function, then the
heartbeat shifts its services to the secondary node.
Same is the case with any function in the ocf script.
So, why this is happening!!
Please help me out.
Regards,
padmaja
___
Linux-HA mailing list
Linux-HA@lists.linux-ha.org
http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha
See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems
___
Linux-HA mailing list
Linux-HA@lists.linux-ha.org
http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha
See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems
