Re: [Linux-HA] Replacement of heartbeat on fc18 ?

2013-08-27 Thread Moullé Alain 

Hello,
ok so I was quite right ?

As I can read on your link :


It's pretty easy to setup. RRP supports various mode of operation:

  * *Active: both rings will be active, in use*
  * Passive: only one of the N ring is in use, the second one will be
use only if the first one fails

Make your own choice!



Alain


Le 27/08/2013 10:20, Francis SOUYRI a écrit :

Bonjour Alain,

Check this: 
http://www.sebastien-han.fr/blog/2012/08/01/corosync-rrp-configuration/


Best regards.

Francis

On 08/27/2013 08:03 AM, Moullé Alain wrote:

Hi,

So what's the real difference between using two rings with
rrp_mode=passive and rrp_mode=active ?

That's what makes me think that "passive" meant one ring active the
other as backup, and "active" meant both rings active at the same 
time ...


(man corosync.conf is not clear for me on this point)

Thanks
Alain


Le 26/08/2013 16:58, Digimer a écrit :

Nope, that just enables RRP (without it, the failure of ring 0 would
fail the cluster)

On 26/08/13 10:27, Moullé Alain wrote:

Hi,
sorry but I thought that if we set "rrp_mode" to "active", corosync is
using both rings "at the same time" , isn't it ?
Alain

Le 26/08/2013 15:53, Digimer a écrit :

On 26/08/13 09:14, Francis SOUYRI wrote:

Hello,

Is Corosync works with eth and bond at the same time ?

with the config below I have an error message "[MAIN  ] No 
ring0_addr

specified for node"

totem {
version: 2
secauth: off
cluster_name: cluster
interface {
  ringnumber: 0
  bindnetaddr: 10.1.1.0
  ttl: 1
}
interface {
  ringnumber: 1
  bindnetaddr: 192.168.1.0
  ttl: 1
}
transport: udpu
}

nodelist {
node {
  ring0_addr: 10.1.1.1
  nodeid: 1
 }
node {
  ring0_addr: 10.1.1.2
  nodeid: 2
 }

node {
  ring1_addr: 192.168.1.253
 }
node {
  ring1_addr: 192.168.1.254
 }
}

quorum {
provider: corosync_votequorum
}

logging {
to_syslog: yes
}

The addresses 10.1.1.1 (bond0) and 192.168.1.253 (eth2) are on the
same
node.
The addresses 10.1.1.2 (bond0) and 192.168.1.254 (eth2) on the 
other.


Best regards.

Francis


Not "at the same time", no. Corosync will use ring 0 for as long 
as it

is available and working. If the interface/bond behind ring 0 fails,
it will switch to ring 1.



___
Linux-HA mailing list
Linux-HA@lists.linux-ha.org
http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha
See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems





___
Linux-HA mailing list
Linux-HA@lists.linux-ha.org
http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha
See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems




___
Linux-HA mailing list
Linux-HA@lists.linux-ha.org
http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha
See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems


___
Linux-HA mailing list
Linux-HA@lists.linux-ha.org
http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha
See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems

Re: [Linux-HA] Replacement of heartbeat on fc18 ?

2013-08-27 Thread Francis SOUYRI 

Bonjour Alain,

Check this: 
http://www.sebastien-han.fr/blog/2012/08/01/corosync-rrp-configuration/


Best regards.

Francis

On 08/27/2013 08:03 AM, Moullé Alain wrote:

Hi,

So what's the real difference between using two rings with
rrp_mode=passive and rrp_mode=active ?

That's what makes me think that "passive" meant one ring active the
other as backup, and "active" meant both rings active at the same time ...

(man corosync.conf is not clear for me on this point)

Thanks
Alain


Le 26/08/2013 16:58, Digimer a écrit :

Nope, that just enables RRP (without it, the failure of ring 0 would
fail the cluster)

On 26/08/13 10:27, Moullé Alain wrote:

Hi,
sorry but I thought that if we set "rrp_mode" to "active", corosync is
using both rings "at the same time" , isn't it ?
Alain

Le 26/08/2013 15:53, Digimer a écrit :

On 26/08/13 09:14, Francis SOUYRI wrote:

Hello,

Is Corosync works with eth and bond at the same time ?

with the config below I have an error message "[MAIN  ] No ring0_addr
specified for node"

totem {
version: 2
secauth: off
cluster_name: cluster
interface {
  ringnumber: 0
  bindnetaddr: 10.1.1.0
  ttl: 1
}
interface {
  ringnumber: 1
  bindnetaddr: 192.168.1.0
  ttl: 1
}
transport: udpu
}

nodelist {
node {
  ring0_addr: 10.1.1.1
  nodeid: 1
 }
node {
  ring0_addr: 10.1.1.2
  nodeid: 2
 }

node {
  ring1_addr: 192.168.1.253
 }
node {
  ring1_addr: 192.168.1.254
 }
}

quorum {
provider: corosync_votequorum
}

logging {
to_syslog: yes
}

The addresses 10.1.1.1 (bond0) and 192.168.1.253 (eth2) are on the
same
node.
The addresses 10.1.1.2 (bond0) and 192.168.1.254 (eth2) on the other.

Best regards.

Francis


Not "at the same time", no. Corosync will use ring 0 for as long as it
is available and working. If the interface/bond behind ring 0 fails,
it will switch to ring 1.



___
Linux-HA mailing list
Linux-HA@lists.linux-ha.org
http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha
See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems





___
Linux-HA mailing list
Linux-HA@lists.linux-ha.org
http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha
See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems




___
Linux-HA mailing list
Linux-HA@lists.linux-ha.org
http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha
See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems

Re: [Linux-HA] Replacement of heartbeat on fc18 ?

2013-08-26 Thread Moullé Alain 

Hi,

So what's the real difference between using two rings with 
rrp_mode=passive and rrp_mode=active ?


That's what makes me think that "passive" meant one ring active the 
other as backup, and "active" meant both rings active at the same time ...


(man corosync.conf is not clear for me on this point)

Thanks
Alain


Le 26/08/2013 16:58, Digimer a écrit :
Nope, that just enables RRP (without it, the failure of ring 0 would 
fail the cluster)


On 26/08/13 10:27, Moullé Alain wrote:

Hi,
sorry but I thought that if we set "rrp_mode" to "active", corosync is
using both rings "at the same time" , isn't it ?
Alain

Le 26/08/2013 15:53, Digimer a écrit :

On 26/08/13 09:14, Francis SOUYRI wrote:

Hello,

Is Corosync works with eth and bond at the same time ?

with the config below I have an error message "[MAIN  ] No ring0_addr
specified for node"

totem {
version: 2
secauth: off
cluster_name: cluster
   interface {
 ringnumber: 0
 bindnetaddr: 10.1.1.0
 ttl: 1
   }
   interface {
 ringnumber: 1
 bindnetaddr: 192.168.1.0
 ttl: 1
   }
transport: udpu
}

nodelist {
   node {
 ring0_addr: 10.1.1.1
 nodeid: 1
}
   node {
 ring0_addr: 10.1.1.2
 nodeid: 2
}

   node {
 ring1_addr: 192.168.1.253
}
   node {
 ring1_addr: 192.168.1.254
}
}

quorum {
provider: corosync_votequorum
}

logging {
to_syslog: yes
}

The addresses 10.1.1.1 (bond0) and 192.168.1.253 (eth2) are on the 
same

node.
The addresses 10.1.1.2 (bond0) and 192.168.1.254 (eth2) on the other.

Best regards.

Francis


Not "at the same time", no. Corosync will use ring 0 for as long as it
is available and working. If the interface/bond behind ring 0 fails,
it will switch to ring 1.



___
Linux-HA mailing list
Linux-HA@lists.linux-ha.org
http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha
See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems





___
Linux-HA mailing list
Linux-HA@lists.linux-ha.org
http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha
See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems

Re: [Linux-HA] Replacement of heartbeat on fc18 ?

2013-08-26 Thread Digimer 
Nope, that just enables RRP (without it, the failure of ring 0 would 
fail the cluster)


On 26/08/13 10:27, Moullé Alain wrote:

Hi,
sorry but I thought that if we set "rrp_mode" to "active", corosync is
using both rings "at the same time" , isn't it ?
Alain

Le 26/08/2013 15:53, Digimer a écrit :

On 26/08/13 09:14, Francis SOUYRI wrote:

Hello,

Is Corosync works with eth and bond at the same time ?

with the config below I have an error message "[MAIN  ] No ring0_addr
specified for node"

totem {
version: 2
secauth: off
cluster_name: cluster
   interface {
 ringnumber: 0
 bindnetaddr: 10.1.1.0
 ttl: 1
   }
   interface {
 ringnumber: 1
 bindnetaddr: 192.168.1.0
 ttl: 1
   }
transport: udpu
}

nodelist {
   node {
 ring0_addr: 10.1.1.1
 nodeid: 1
}
   node {
 ring0_addr: 10.1.1.2
 nodeid: 2
}

   node {
 ring1_addr: 192.168.1.253
}
   node {
 ring1_addr: 192.168.1.254
}
}

quorum {
provider: corosync_votequorum
}

logging {
to_syslog: yes
}

The addresses 10.1.1.1 (bond0) and 192.168.1.253 (eth2) are on the same
node.
The addresses 10.1.1.2 (bond0) and 192.168.1.254 (eth2) on the other.

Best regards.

Francis


Not "at the same time", no. Corosync will use ring 0 for as long as it
is available and working. If the interface/bond behind ring 0 fails,
it will switch to ring 1.



___
Linux-HA mailing list
Linux-HA@lists.linux-ha.org
http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha
See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems



--
Digimer
Papers and Projects: https://alteeve.ca/w/
What if the cure for cancer is trapped in the mind of a person without 
access to education?

___
Linux-HA mailing list
Linux-HA@lists.linux-ha.org
http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha
See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems

Re: [Linux-HA] Replacement of heartbeat on fc18 ?

2013-08-26 Thread Moullé Alain 

Hi,
sorry but I thought that if we set "rrp_mode" to "active", corosync is 
using both rings "at the same time" , isn't it ?

Alain

Le 26/08/2013 15:53, Digimer a écrit :

On 26/08/13 09:14, Francis SOUYRI wrote:

Hello,

Is Corosync works with eth and bond at the same time ?

with the config below I have an error message "[MAIN  ] No ring0_addr
specified for node"

totem {
version: 2
secauth: off
cluster_name: cluster
   interface {
 ringnumber: 0
 bindnetaddr: 10.1.1.0
 ttl: 1
   }
   interface {
 ringnumber: 1
 bindnetaddr: 192.168.1.0
 ttl: 1
   }
transport: udpu
}

nodelist {
   node {
 ring0_addr: 10.1.1.1
 nodeid: 1
}
   node {
 ring0_addr: 10.1.1.2
 nodeid: 2
}

   node {
 ring1_addr: 192.168.1.253
}
   node {
 ring1_addr: 192.168.1.254
}
}

quorum {
provider: corosync_votequorum
}

logging {
to_syslog: yes
}

The addresses 10.1.1.1 (bond0) and 192.168.1.253 (eth2) are on the same
node.
The addresses 10.1.1.2 (bond0) and 192.168.1.254 (eth2) on the other.

Best regards.

Francis


Not "at the same time", no. Corosync will use ring 0 for as long as it 
is available and working. If the interface/bond behind ring 0 fails, 
it will switch to ring 1.




___
Linux-HA mailing list
Linux-HA@lists.linux-ha.org
http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha
See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems

Re: [Linux-HA] Replacement of heartbeat on fc18 ?

2013-08-26 Thread Digimer 

On 26/08/13 09:14, Francis SOUYRI wrote:

Hello,

Is Corosync works with eth and bond at the same time ?

with the config below I have an error message "[MAIN  ] No ring0_addr
specified for node"

totem {
version: 2
secauth: off
cluster_name: cluster
   interface {
 ringnumber: 0
 bindnetaddr: 10.1.1.0
 ttl: 1
   }
   interface {
 ringnumber: 1
 bindnetaddr: 192.168.1.0
 ttl: 1
   }
transport: udpu
}

nodelist {
   node {
 ring0_addr: 10.1.1.1
 nodeid: 1
}
   node {
 ring0_addr: 10.1.1.2
 nodeid: 2
}

   node {
 ring1_addr: 192.168.1.253
}
   node {
 ring1_addr: 192.168.1.254
}
}

quorum {
provider: corosync_votequorum
}

logging {
to_syslog: yes
}

The addresses 10.1.1.1 (bond0) and 192.168.1.253 (eth2) are on the same
node.
The addresses 10.1.1.2 (bond0) and 192.168.1.254 (eth2) on the other.

Best regards.

Francis


Not "at the same time", no. Corosync will use ring 0 for as long as it 
is available and working. If the interface/bond behind ring 0 fails, it 
will switch to ring 1.


--
Digimer
Papers and Projects: https://alteeve.ca/w/
What if the cure for cancer is trapped in the mind of a person without 
access to education?

___
Linux-HA mailing list
Linux-HA@lists.linux-ha.org
http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha
See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems

Re: [Linux-HA] Replacement of heartbeat on fc18 ?

2013-08-26 Thread Francis SOUYRI 

Hello,

Is Corosync works with eth and bond at the same time ?

with the config below I have an error message "[MAIN  ] No ring0_addr 
specified for node"


totem {
version: 2
secauth: off
cluster_name: cluster
  interface {
ringnumber: 0
bindnetaddr: 10.1.1.0
ttl: 1
  }
  interface {
ringnumber: 1
bindnetaddr: 192.168.1.0
ttl: 1
  }
transport: udpu
}

nodelist {
  node {
ring0_addr: 10.1.1.1
nodeid: 1
   }
  node {
ring0_addr: 10.1.1.2
nodeid: 2
   }

  node {
ring1_addr: 192.168.1.253
   }
  node {
ring1_addr: 192.168.1.254
   }
}

quorum {
provider: corosync_votequorum
}

logging {
to_syslog: yes
}

The addresses 10.1.1.1 (bond0) and 192.168.1.253 (eth2) are on the same 
node.

The addresses 10.1.1.2 (bond0) and 192.168.1.254 (eth2) on the other.

Best regards.

Francis

On 08/26/2013 01:59 PM, Digimer wrote:

Corosync works on any network connection; ethX, bondX, etc. It does not
support serial. How you do this depends on how you configure corosync
(directly or via pcs). In the end, the IP address resolved by your
hostname is the interface corosync will use.

So if your nodes are at 10.255.0.1/16 and 10.255.0.2/16, you set
bindnetaddr to 10.255.0.0, and you've setup a mode=1 bond called 'bond0'
with the addresses above, corosync will use the bond.

On 26/08/13 05:03, Francis SOUYRI wrote:

Hello,

  Thank you for your replies.

With Heartbeat I have this, for the heartbeat serial link, eth link and
bond link. Also eth is used for client access to the cluster, bond is
used for drbd. The eth is monitored with ipfail.

How can I implement this with corosync, actually I have only a link on
eth...

Best regards.

Francis

On 08/25/2013 02:07 PM, Aarti Sawant wrote:

hello,

Corosync provides a reliable communications layer for high availability
clusters. It ensures that cluster nodes can send and receive messages
over
multiple, redundant communication paths.
so you can use corosync instead of heartbeat whih serves the same
purpose.



On Fri, Aug 23, 2013 at 8:02 PM, Digimer  wrote:


OpenAIS is not needed unless you specifically need the SA Forum's AIS
API.
For most people, corosync alone is perfectly fine.


On 23/08/13 10:20, Francis SOUYRI wrote:


Hi,

Thank you but I do not find on yum OpenAIS or an rpm for OpenAIS for
fc18, do you know where I can search.

Best regards.

Francis


On 08/23/2013 03:58 PM, Nick Cameo wrote:


Pacemaker+Corosync/OpenAIS

http://clusterlabs.org/

N.

__**_
Linux-HA mailing list
Linux-HA@lists.linux-ha.org
http://lists.linux-ha.org/**mailman/listinfo/linux-ha

See also:
http://linux-ha.org/**ReportingProblems





__**_
Linux-HA mailing list
Linux-HA@lists.linux-ha.org
http://lists.linux-ha.org/**mailman/listinfo/linux-ha

See also:
http://linux-ha.org/**ReportingProblems





--
Digimer
Papers and Projects: https://alteeve.ca/w/
What if the cure for cancer is trapped in the mind of a person without
access to education?

__**_
Linux-HA mailing list
Linux-HA@lists.linux-ha.org
http://lists.linux-ha.org/**mailman/listinfo/linux-ha

See also:
http://linux-ha.org/**ReportingProblems



___
Linux-HA mailing list
Linux-HA@lists.linux-ha.org
http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha
See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems




___
Linux-HA mailing list
Linux-HA@lists.linux-ha.org
http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha
See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems





___
Linux-HA mailing list
Linux-HA@lists.linux-ha.org
http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha
See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems

Re: [Linux-HA] Replacement of heartbeat on fc18 ?

2013-08-26 Thread Digimer 
Corosync works on any network connection; ethX, bondX, etc. It does not 
support serial. How you do this depends on how you configure corosync 
(directly or via pcs). In the end, the IP address resolved by your 
hostname is the interface corosync will use.


So if your nodes are at 10.255.0.1/16 and 10.255.0.2/16, you set 
bindnetaddr to 10.255.0.0, and you've setup a mode=1 bond called 'bond0' 
with the addresses above, corosync will use the bond.


On 26/08/13 05:03, Francis SOUYRI wrote:

Hello,

 Thank you for your replies.

With Heartbeat I have this, for the heartbeat serial link, eth link and
bond link. Also eth is used for client access to the cluster, bond is
used for drbd. The eth is monitored with ipfail.

How can I implement this with corosync, actually I have only a link on
eth...

Best regards.

Francis

On 08/25/2013 02:07 PM, Aarti Sawant wrote:

hello,

Corosync provides a reliable communications layer for high availability
clusters. It ensures that cluster nodes can send and receive messages
over
multiple, redundant communication paths.
so you can use corosync instead of heartbeat whih serves the same
purpose.



On Fri, Aug 23, 2013 at 8:02 PM, Digimer  wrote:


OpenAIS is not needed unless you specifically need the SA Forum's AIS
API.
For most people, corosync alone is perfectly fine.


On 23/08/13 10:20, Francis SOUYRI wrote:


Hi,

Thank you but I do not find on yum OpenAIS or an rpm for OpenAIS for
fc18, do you know where I can search.

Best regards.

Francis


On 08/23/2013 03:58 PM, Nick Cameo wrote:


Pacemaker+Corosync/OpenAIS

http://clusterlabs.org/

N.

__**_
Linux-HA mailing list
Linux-HA@lists.linux-ha.org
http://lists.linux-ha.org/**mailman/listinfo/linux-ha

See also:
http://linux-ha.org/**ReportingProblems





__**_
Linux-HA mailing list
Linux-HA@lists.linux-ha.org
http://lists.linux-ha.org/**mailman/listinfo/linux-ha

See also:
http://linux-ha.org/**ReportingProblems





--
Digimer
Papers and Projects: https://alteeve.ca/w/
What if the cure for cancer is trapped in the mind of a person without
access to education?

__**_
Linux-HA mailing list
Linux-HA@lists.linux-ha.org
http://lists.linux-ha.org/**mailman/listinfo/linux-ha

See also:
http://linux-ha.org/**ReportingProblems



___
Linux-HA mailing list
Linux-HA@lists.linux-ha.org
http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha
See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems




___
Linux-HA mailing list
Linux-HA@lists.linux-ha.org
http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha
See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems



--
Digimer
Papers and Projects: https://alteeve.ca/w/
What if the cure for cancer is trapped in the mind of a person without 
access to education?

___
Linux-HA mailing list
Linux-HA@lists.linux-ha.org
http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha
See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems

Re: [Linux-HA] Replacement of heartbeat on fc18 ?

2013-08-26 Thread Francis SOUYRI 

Hello,

Thank you for your replies.

With Heartbeat I have this, for the heartbeat serial link, eth link and 
bond link. Also eth is used for client access to the cluster, bond is 
used for drbd. The eth is monitored with ipfail.


How can I implement this with corosync, actually I have only a link on 
eth...


Best regards.

Francis

On 08/25/2013 02:07 PM, Aarti Sawant wrote:

hello,

Corosync provides a reliable communications layer for high availability
clusters. It ensures that cluster nodes can send and receive messages over
multiple, redundant communication paths.
so you can use corosync instead of heartbeat whih serves the same purpose.



On Fri, Aug 23, 2013 at 8:02 PM, Digimer  wrote:


OpenAIS is not needed unless you specifically need the SA Forum's AIS API.
For most people, corosync alone is perfectly fine.


On 23/08/13 10:20, Francis SOUYRI wrote:


Hi,

Thank you but I do not find on yum OpenAIS or an rpm for OpenAIS for
fc18, do you know where I can search.

Best regards.

Francis


On 08/23/2013 03:58 PM, Nick Cameo wrote:


Pacemaker+Corosync/OpenAIS

http://clusterlabs.org/

N.

__**_
Linux-HA mailing list
Linux-HA@lists.linux-ha.org
http://lists.linux-ha.org/**mailman/listinfo/linux-ha
See also: 
http://linux-ha.org/**ReportingProblems




__**_
Linux-HA mailing list
Linux-HA@lists.linux-ha.org
http://lists.linux-ha.org/**mailman/listinfo/linux-ha
See also: 
http://linux-ha.org/**ReportingProblems




--
Digimer
Papers and Projects: https://alteeve.ca/w/
What if the cure for cancer is trapped in the mind of a person without
access to education?

__**_
Linux-HA mailing list
Linux-HA@lists.linux-ha.org
http://lists.linux-ha.org/**mailman/listinfo/linux-ha
See also: 
http://linux-ha.org/**ReportingProblems


___
Linux-HA mailing list
Linux-HA@lists.linux-ha.org
http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha
See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems




___
Linux-HA mailing list
Linux-HA@lists.linux-ha.org
http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha
See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems

Re: [Linux-HA] Replacement of heartbeat on fc18 ?

2013-08-25 Thread Aarti Sawant 
hello,

Corosync provides a reliable communications layer for high availability
clusters. It ensures that cluster nodes can send and receive messages over
multiple, redundant communication paths.
so you can use corosync instead of heartbeat whih serves the same purpose.



On Fri, Aug 23, 2013 at 8:02 PM, Digimer  wrote:

> OpenAIS is not needed unless you specifically need the SA Forum's AIS API.
> For most people, corosync alone is perfectly fine.
>
>
> On 23/08/13 10:20, Francis SOUYRI wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Thank you but I do not find on yum OpenAIS or an rpm for OpenAIS for
>> fc18, do you know where I can search.
>>
>> Best regards.
>>
>> Francis
>>
>>
>> On 08/23/2013 03:58 PM, Nick Cameo wrote:
>>
>>> Pacemaker+Corosync/OpenAIS
>>>
>>> http://clusterlabs.org/
>>>
>>> N.
>>>
>>> __**_
>>> Linux-HA mailing list
>>> Linux-HA@lists.linux-ha.org
>>> http://lists.linux-ha.org/**mailman/listinfo/linux-ha
>>> See also: 
>>> http://linux-ha.org/**ReportingProblems
>>>
>>>
>>>
>> __**_
>> Linux-HA mailing list
>> Linux-HA@lists.linux-ha.org
>> http://lists.linux-ha.org/**mailman/listinfo/linux-ha
>> See also: 
>> http://linux-ha.org/**ReportingProblems
>>
>
>
> --
> Digimer
> Papers and Projects: https://alteeve.ca/w/
> What if the cure for cancer is trapped in the mind of a person without
> access to education?
>
> __**_
> Linux-HA mailing list
> Linux-HA@lists.linux-ha.org
> http://lists.linux-ha.org/**mailman/listinfo/linux-ha
> See also: 
> http://linux-ha.org/**ReportingProblems
>
___
Linux-HA mailing list
Linux-HA@lists.linux-ha.org
http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha
See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems

Re: [Linux-HA] Replacement of heartbeat on fc18 ?

2013-08-23 Thread Digimer 
OpenAIS is not needed unless you specifically need the SA Forum's AIS 
API. For most people, corosync alone is perfectly fine.


On 23/08/13 10:20, Francis SOUYRI wrote:

Hi,

Thank you but I do not find on yum OpenAIS or an rpm for OpenAIS for
fc18, do you know where I can search.

Best regards.

Francis


On 08/23/2013 03:58 PM, Nick Cameo wrote:

Pacemaker+Corosync/OpenAIS

http://clusterlabs.org/

N.

___
Linux-HA mailing list
Linux-HA@lists.linux-ha.org
http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha
See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems




___
Linux-HA mailing list
Linux-HA@lists.linux-ha.org
http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha
See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems



--
Digimer
Papers and Projects: https://alteeve.ca/w/
What if the cure for cancer is trapped in the mind of a person without 
access to education?

___
Linux-HA mailing list
Linux-HA@lists.linux-ha.org
http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha
See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems

Re: [Linux-HA] Replacement of heartbeat on fc18 ?

2013-08-23 Thread emmanuel segura 
yum install corosync pacemaker


2013/8/23 Francis SOUYRI 

> Hi,
>
> Thank you but I do not find on yum OpenAIS or an rpm for OpenAIS for fc18,
> do you know where I can search.
>
> Best regards.
>
> Francis
>
>
> On 08/23/2013 03:58 PM, Nick Cameo wrote:
>
>> Pacemaker+Corosync/OpenAIS
>>
>> http://clusterlabs.org/
>>
>> N.
>>
>> __**_
>> Linux-HA mailing list
>> Linux-HA@lists.linux-ha.org
>> http://lists.linux-ha.org/**mailman/listinfo/linux-ha
>> See also: 
>> http://linux-ha.org/**ReportingProblems
>>
>>
>>
> __**_
> Linux-HA mailing list
> Linux-HA@lists.linux-ha.org
> http://lists.linux-ha.org/**mailman/listinfo/linux-ha
> See also: 
> http://linux-ha.org/**ReportingProblems
>



-- 
esta es mi vida e me la vivo hasta que dios quiera
___
Linux-HA mailing list
Linux-HA@lists.linux-ha.org
http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha
See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems

Re: [Linux-HA] Replacement of heartbeat on fc18 ?

2013-08-23 Thread Francis SOUYRI 

Hi,

Thank you but I do not find on yum OpenAIS or an rpm for OpenAIS for 
fc18, do you know where I can search.


Best regards.

Francis


On 08/23/2013 03:58 PM, Nick Cameo wrote:

Pacemaker+Corosync/OpenAIS

http://clusterlabs.org/

N.

___
Linux-HA mailing list
Linux-HA@lists.linux-ha.org
http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha
See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems




___
Linux-HA mailing list
Linux-HA@lists.linux-ha.org
http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha
See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems

Re: [Linux-HA] Replacement of heartbeat on fc18 ?

2013-08-23 Thread Nick Cameo 
Pacemaker+Corosync/OpenAIS

http://clusterlabs.org/

N.

___
Linux-HA mailing list
Linux-HA@lists.linux-ha.org
http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha
See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems

[Linux-HA] Replacement of heartbeat on fc18 ?

2013-08-23 Thread Francis SOUYRI 

Hello,

I planned to migrate our clusters from the fc17 to fc18 but 
heartbeat is deprecated on fc18 (So it work fine, after disabling the 
automatically activated firewall in fc18 !!!).
What is the best replacement for a configuration with 2 nodes heartbeat 
crm 1(#crm respawn)/drbd ?


Best regards.

Francis

___
Linux-HA mailing list
Linux-HA@lists.linux-ha.org
http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha
See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems